Pre-1997 Models

Which engine is more durable and reliable? 4.9, 5.0, 5.8?

Old May 14, 2006 | 01:53 PM
  #16  
hmustang's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 3,188
Likes: 3
From: Kansas side of the greater KC area
Seeing how I only onwed one Ford with the 302 and the rest with 4.6 or 5.4 current engines in them I will have to go wtih the 302 but the other 2 are just as well I belive all three of the old engines are better than the current V6 option. The current trucks you can only get a six in a reg cab 4x2 that tells me it is a very weak engine the older trucks you could get the 4.9 in a extended cab 4x4 even some 250's and 350's had the old 4.9 in them as well.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2006 | 02:28 AM
  #17  
Wild Bill's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1969
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
The 4.9 by far is the most reliable. I wish they didn't stop making it.

My old '94 F150 had 185k when I sold it, and never had any major work done on it. Simply tune-up type stuff. I know who has it and over 200K by now. The tranny is wearing out, but the engine is still going strong.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2006 | 05:12 PM
  #18  
david_aaron236's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Maine
4.9 is god

I have owned two 1990 F150s, both of which had the 4.9. I sold the first one that I had, which was an automatic(E4OD) that had well over 400,000 miles on it when I sold it and it is still running fine today, aside from some tranny issues. The other one, a 4.9-five speed, is what I currently drive now and it has 104,000 miles on. These engines might not be the most powerful, but they surely are the most dependable.
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #19  
Tiwsted's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Talking

i have a 91 4.9 and had 200,000 miles on it and in 6 months all i had to do was a new water pump. if you take good care out if then the 4.9 can be a relaly reliable and good engine.
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #20  
FILDO's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
95 w/ 410,000

My 95 F150 5.8 has over 410,000 miles on it!! the only major mechanical issue we've had w/ it was the tranny. It went out at 305,000 miles. Runs great but looks like crap. It's been totaled 3 times, but hey it runs!! lol
 
Reply
Old May 23, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #21  
inline6dude's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: South Jersey
my pops bought an 88 brand new with the 300/6 and granny four speed, it pulled so much sheetrock and other things and i remember the speedo going back to the zero's a few times...i still see it, still has the slight vavle tap , my other three 6's i run the hell outta them with no major problems, i just maintence them when supposed...good luck
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2016 | 01:09 AM
  #22  
Wmartinez460's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
My dad owned a 93 5.0 and it was beautiful only broke down once, now I recently bought a 94 with about 190k miles two weeks ago and the water pump broke on me 2nd day I got it but when I took it off I could tell that it had been there since day 1. Oil pressure seems to be reading a bit low but from what I can see its that it was maintained to its full pontential. I love it and don't planned to get rid of it! Soon I'll rebuild it and it should be on the road for decades! For now I think it's been a pretty good truck, everything else feels great
 
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2016 | 11:05 AM
  #23  
Roadie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 221
From: Wilmington,NC
Revived a 10 year old thread.

They are all excellent engines. However, I had a 94 SWB F150 4x4 with the 302. I traded it for a new 2000F150SCAB4x4 with a 5.4. The new truck was more powerful, better on gas, roomier, much quieter, just better all around. The 2V 5.4/4.6 engines are even more reliable than the 302.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2016 | 10:29 PM
  #24  
GA94GRTWHITE's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
My 94' F150 had over 350K miles on it when I traded it. The only thing I ever replaced was water pump and alternator from failures. Now it did have a 3.07 rear ratio which IMHO kept it from being flogged too much (I mean you can't do much of a burn out with those gears). And also because of the gears it struggle to tow stuff but I'd imagine that if the maint was kept up on it another 100K would have been easy.
 
Reply
Old May 11, 2016 | 11:30 PM
  #25  
Roadie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 221
From: Wilmington,NC
I used to work with a guy who bought a new Bronco with the 4.9L six. I commented to him about how reliable I had heard they were and he said he didn't have many miles on it when the timing gears failed!!
 
Reply


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:44 PM.