First time at the track...
First time at the track...
Took the L to the track for the first time tonight. I've run the stang and the bike before, but hadn't had a chance to run the truck.
Mods are (pervious owner installed): Pro-M 80 mm MAF, JBA shortys and Flowmasters. I raced will full street weight (hitch, spare, and tailgate) on BFG Comp T/A ZR's at around 32 psi. My goal was to see what it ran in full street trim before my chip and pulley come in shortly.
Best time was:
2.05 60'
13.26 1/4
103.76 mph
I need to lower the tire pressure a little to really hook. My 5 runs were 13.30, 13.32, 14.10, 13.29, 13.26 all at 103.xx mph. The 14 was right after they sprayed a fresh layer of traction compound. Traction my ***. I slid straight sideways when I rolled into the throttle. My friend I was running against did the same thing. But we didn't have a choice since we were already in the lane when the decided to hold the start and reapply.
All in all I am impressed with the times. I assume with my PSP chip, 4 lb pulley, and denso's that are on the way I should be safely in the 12's. I ran against another white '99 on my last run who had 4 lber, chip, single blade TB, and boost bypass and he only ran a 13.1 at 106. I hope I pick up more than that.
Mods are (pervious owner installed): Pro-M 80 mm MAF, JBA shortys and Flowmasters. I raced will full street weight (hitch, spare, and tailgate) on BFG Comp T/A ZR's at around 32 psi. My goal was to see what it ran in full street trim before my chip and pulley come in shortly.
Best time was:
2.05 60'
13.26 1/4
103.76 mph
I need to lower the tire pressure a little to really hook. My 5 runs were 13.30, 13.32, 14.10, 13.29, 13.26 all at 103.xx mph. The 14 was right after they sprayed a fresh layer of traction compound. Traction my ***. I slid straight sideways when I rolled into the throttle. My friend I was running against did the same thing. But we didn't have a choice since we were already in the lane when the decided to hold the start and reapply.
All in all I am impressed with the times. I assume with my PSP chip, 4 lb pulley, and denso's that are on the way I should be safely in the 12's. I ran against another white '99 on my last run who had 4 lber, chip, single blade TB, and boost bypass and he only ran a 13.1 at 106. I hope I pick up more than that.
First of all conrats on the times, you have a strong running truck.
I'm curious about the MAF....I had a pro-m 80 that I bought from Swanson a couple of years ago and the damn thing made my truck go nuts. It seems the meter was actually meant for a mustang application according to the serial numbers, and it made the truck thirsty for octane, I had to poor in 100 octane all the time to keep it from rattling. But I got similar numbers at the drag strip to yours.
Does your truck need a lot of octane or is it normal....like I said just curious.
Dale
I'm curious about the MAF....I had a pro-m 80 that I bought from Swanson a couple of years ago and the damn thing made my truck go nuts. It seems the meter was actually meant for a mustang application according to the serial numbers, and it made the truck thirsty for octane, I had to poor in 100 octane all the time to keep it from rattling. But I got similar numbers at the drag strip to yours.
Does your truck need a lot of octane or is it normal....like I said just curious.
Dale
Bad as L,
Previous owner did the mod and didn't still have the factory parts or I would have probably switched back. And you are right, it is calibrated for a mustang that has been converted to 24 lb injectors. That's not really a big deal, though. Every MAF sensor has a transfer function from volts to air mass flow. As long as the MAF you put in has a similar transfer function to what came out, it should be alright. The intended application doesn't matter. I THINK that the Pro-M transfer function shows a little bit less air than the factory sensor so that the truck leans out a little bit, and picks up a little power (plus its less restrictive).
I haven't had any drivability issues or pinging that I know of on 93 octane. But I also have never driven an L that still had the stock MAF so I probably wouldn't know what the difference was. Driving home last night I thought I might have heard a little pinging, but the flowmasters are so damn loud its hard to hear if there was any or not. Personally, I don't like to use aftermarket sensors and thought about the 90 mm conversion when I got the pulley and chip. I decided against it for now, but might buy one in the future. I told the tuner that this is the MAF I had, so the chip should correct the readings back to actual airflow anyway. I just hope the combination of the chip and MAF don't mass things up.
I'm curious about the MAF....I had a pro-m 80 that I bought from Swanson a couple of years ago and the damn thing made my truck go nuts. It seems the meter was actually meant for a mustang application according to the serial numbers, and it made the truck thirsty for octane, I had to poor in 100 octane all the time to keep it from rattling.
I haven't had any drivability issues or pinging that I know of on 93 octane. But I also have never driven an L that still had the stock MAF so I probably wouldn't know what the difference was. Driving home last night I thought I might have heard a little pinging, but the flowmasters are so damn loud its hard to hear if there was any or not. Personally, I don't like to use aftermarket sensors and thought about the 90 mm conversion when I got the pulley and chip. I decided against it for now, but might buy one in the future. I told the tuner that this is the MAF I had, so the chip should correct the readings back to actual airflow anyway. I just hope the combination of the chip and MAF don't mass things up.


