Lightning

single blade throttle body

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 11:10 PM
  #1  
shawn672's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh,Pa
single blade throttle body

to add this mod with jl ram air kit , do you have to have a performance chip ? or can i use stock program? thanks for any help on subject.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 11:16 PM
  #2  
wrightlightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
From: The Natural State
Arrow

No chip needed for the t/b.
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2002 | 11:20 PM
  #3  
shawn672's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh,Pa
thanks for the info. i wanted to see what mods i can add safely before a chip.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 12:49 AM
  #4  
cpeapea's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: irving, texas
is the throttle body acutally worth the doe i would be dropping in it...although i sure do like the way they look but how many hp or torque does it really add?
 

Last edited by cpeapea; Oct 23, 2002 at 12:54 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 01:12 AM
  #5  
Suavy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,840
Likes: 0
From: Bridgeport, MI
Talking

I'd like to know some stats on this mod also. Thanks, Suavy
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 06:23 AM
  #6  
loosebolt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: S.E. Michigan
I put on the BA Bolt T/B, which rocks, and 'r' pump and e-fan and dyno'd a 7 hp gain at the rear wheels with all that. BUT, throttle response is amazing now
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 08:01 AM
  #7  
yysenhimer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1
From: Central Joisey
I think it helps. Anything you can do to get more air in and out of the motor is good. No chip is required, but the gain from reprogramming the chip to richen the fuel would help gain even more HP.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Oct 23, 2002 | 08:05 AM
  #8  
soap's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,342
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally posted by yysenhimer
but the gain from reprogramming the chip to richen the fuel would help gain even more HP.
Obviously someone who has no clue what they are talking about.

--Joe
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 08:31 AM
  #9  
yysenhimer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1
From: Central Joisey
Originally posted by soap
Obviously someone who has no clue what they are talking about.

--Joe
Whatever...:o
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 09:00 AM
  #10  
Spanky99L's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally posted by yysenhimer
Whatever...:o
What soap is saying is richness looses power. Being Lean gains power. you have it backwards.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 09:05 AM
  #11  
Speedin Bob's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 4,402
Likes: 0
From: On the side of the Road attempting to explain 135 miles per hour
$400 for MAYBE 3 hp is tough to justify IMHO.

Throttle response is noticible however.

The FRPP fitment can be modified withthe L linkage in order to fit. LFP carried them ready to bolt-on at one time. Not sure if they do anymore.

best advice, pick one up second-hand unless $$ isn't a concern and you're looking for instant Bling Bling.

Bob
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 09:41 AM
  #12  
yysenhimer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1
From: Central Joisey
Originally posted by Spanky99L
What soap is saying is richness looses power. Being Lean gains power. you have it backwards.
I hear what you are saying, running a little lean will make more power. Just to keep the post short, I suggested a chip reburn. You want to optimize fuel, timing, shift points to compensate for the added air flow. The Principals of Power: Increasing an Engine's Output Maximizing the power output of any engine is fairly basic in theory. Since an engine is fundamentally an air pump, taking in air (and a small dose of fuel), compressing and burning that air, and exhausting the leftover air, it stands to reason that any engine modifications that increase the amount of air flowing through an engine will increase power, and that's the basic theory behind most of today's engine performance parts: Move air into the engine, burn it completely, and move air out.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 10:22 AM
  #13  
soap's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,342
Likes: 0
From: Motor City
Originally posted by yysenhimer
You want to optimize fuel, timing, shift points
That is what a chip does in the first place........non of those parameters will be changed at all by adding a single blade.

--Joe
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 10:22 AM
  #14  
'99 White Lite's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
What soap is saying is richness looses power. Being Lean gains power.
This is semantics here, but sometimes I wonder if everyone really understands what they say. Here are some definitions:

Stoich: Operating with the chemically correct mixture of air and fuel.
Rich: More fuel than Stoich.
Lean: Less fuel than Stoich.
Richer: Adding fuel from where you are at.
Leaner: Taking fuel away from where you are at.

Peak power is definately made when running rich. From the factory, the truck is setup too rich (for reliability reasons) so going Leaner adds power, but still staying on the rich side of Stoich.

A throttle body is usually one of the most worthless mods you can do. A throttle body regulates the airflow going into the engine. When fully open, if the opening is large enough, there is only a small pressure drop accross the opening. Going to a large T-body is only necessary if there is a significant drop in pressure. Maybe for cases with large changes in airflow it is necessary, but only after everything else is done. Since everyone is claiming only small changes in power, that means that the factory throttle body isn't a significant restriction.

A chip can be used to get to more optimum operating points for fuel and air, and also the tranny stuff, rpms, etc. Gaining small amounts of air change (as in the case of upgrading throttle bodies) won't change cylinder pressures and temps enough for there to be a difference, so no chip is needed.

And it really bugs me when people say a throttle body helped out throttle response. It absolutely does no such thing. Since the throttle is larger, then for the same opening angle, it is letting more air and making more power. You can accomplish the same thing with the factory T-body by just pushing the pedal further. Its just perception since the same change in pedal position makes more power. If you go to a bigger T-body, you trade perception of better throttle reponse (than you can get anyway by just moving the pedal further) for controllability you get with a larger range of motion to regulate the air. Remember that the next time you have trouble controlling tire spin off the line!
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2002 | 10:48 AM
  #15  
yysenhimer's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1
From: Central Joisey
I have to agree with you on everything White Lite. If the TB is one of the only mods to be done, then I probably wouldn't go with it because the stock TB is not a significant restriction, and for the cost of the new TB, not a lot of gain will be had. When I installed it with my combination at the time, however, I saw a 4 tenths and 2 mph gain. A lot of that would be attributed to the weather conditions though (10 degrees cooler and a little less humidity).
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:27 AM.