Lightning

#8 or #10

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 06:05 AM
  #16  
Fast Gator's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,632
Likes: 1
From: Stinkin Joisey
There you go, straight from the *ahem* horse's mouth!
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 12:53 PM
  #17  
99REDBOLT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: down south
with the eaton ,how much boost is safe on a stock motor with a well tuned chip and everything correct. i have a #2 upper and a #8 lower on my 99 and had a #2 and #6 for a long time before that with no detonation or problems ever.
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 12:56 PM
  #18  
95 Saleen S351's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Re: Buick V6

Originally posted by SVTED
A good friend of mine has a 1986 Buick T Type Turbo, pushes 21 LB of boost. 80,000 mi stock block. Are you people saying a 1986 V6 Buick has a stronger bottom end then our Lightnings? Ed
Yup!
 
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2002 | 02:03 PM
  #19  
Jay Lincoln's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
From: La Habra, CA
It would be interesting to see where that compressor map ends up at 15 lbs of boost, and 20,000+ RPM. On a logrithmic scale, I'm guessing somewhere north of 400 degrees. Can you say detonation!

The stock blower rpm on our trucks is just under 14,000 RPM at 5,200 RPM. That puts the Delta T ar about 250 degrees at the stock redline and boost.

On top of that, the cams and cyl. heads cannot keep up. You are going to need some serious work at 14-15 lbs and up to make significant further gains.

Like Tim said, you should be looking into other mods than more boost. Boost is just pressure with nowhere to go.

Case in point. My son has a blown, 383 powered Chevelle. We built the motor using Dart Sportsman heads. The thing lost 3 lbs of boost, and gained about 55 hp. That's because the air flow increased. No longer was it backing up into the manifold creating boost. We pullied it back to 7 lbs of boost, but it still didn't make the Hp we had hoped for (360). I did make over 510 lbs of torque. Looks under cammed to me, even though we had a "blower cam".

We changed the cam to a non-blower, solid lifter type. It had fairly tight centerline, and tons of duration, too. Lost 2 more lbs of boost, but ended up with over 400 Hp. We keep losing boost, but make more HP in the process. That's because the pressure is turned into airflow, allowing more volume of fuel and air.


We changed the cam to a non-blower type, with tight centerlines, and lots of duration.
 
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2002 | 08:22 AM
  #20  
BOSTONL's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA.
Thumbs up

What Tim Skelton said.
JL's experience reinforces it.
How else can something that loses performance at rev limit make a vehicle faster?
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 PM.