New Mercury Marauder
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: Middle Ga
Originally posted by SLP 97 CAMARO SS GUY
........i looked inside of it and it has 2 small gauges under the stereo, i couldnt see what they were, anyone know what they are for? maybe they are just for volt and oil pressure or something like that?
........i looked inside of it and it has 2 small gauges under the stereo, i couldnt see what they were, anyone know what they are for? maybe they are just for volt and oil pressure or something like that?
looks like oil and volt
I think with about 11psi vortec it would be a great sleeper
Johnie
btw I would rather have this
Last edited by lxtac; Aug 5, 2002 at 08:07 PM.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
I don't understand-
I'm sitting in my office, looking at my Marauder poster right now, doing a burnout on the track.
That 4.6 may be small, but it's adequate- It smokes the tires on a Mustang, I can smoke the tires in both of the F-150's I've had, and it eagerly rolls my 6,000 lb Expedition-
THis car has everything the Impala SS, had + 27 more horses, (OK, it has 32 less lb. feet of torque), but it also has less weight.
This car, beats the Impala SS in every performance measure (It beat it by $9,000 on the sticker too from 1996 prices)- So, I don't think this car would be a bad buy- I wish I'd bought that new 1996 Impala SS that was still sitting on the lot in Jan. 1997.
I thought 26K was too much- Now I see 1994's, with 50,000 miles, selling for $17,000 - $21,000.00, 1996's for $24,000. I think the Marauder will be a hit as well. I saw three on the lot here in Plano, but none on the street yet...
I think FoMoCo should've dropped in the 5.4L, as is (260 HP/350 lb. ft) and it would probably be quicker in the quarter, but they didn't, so we'll have to adapt...
That 4.6 may be small, but it's adequate- It smokes the tires on a Mustang, I can smoke the tires in both of the F-150's I've had, and it eagerly rolls my 6,000 lb Expedition-
THis car has everything the Impala SS, had + 27 more horses, (OK, it has 32 less lb. feet of torque), but it also has less weight.
This car, beats the Impala SS in every performance measure (It beat it by $9,000 on the sticker too from 1996 prices)- So, I don't think this car would be a bad buy- I wish I'd bought that new 1996 Impala SS that was still sitting on the lot in Jan. 1997.
I thought 26K was too much- Now I see 1994's, with 50,000 miles, selling for $17,000 - $21,000.00, 1996's for $24,000. I think the Marauder will be a hit as well. I saw three on the lot here in Plano, but none on the street yet...
I think FoMoCo should've dropped in the 5.4L, as is (260 HP/350 lb. ft) and it would probably be quicker in the quarter, but they didn't, so we'll have to adapt...
how did u get such a close up shot of them? thanks again for posting that picture. Mike