Shift Points On your Chip
Shift Points On your Chip
Im going to get my chip reburned here in the next week. What do most of you have your shift points set at? Im only running a Airbox mod at this time. Thanks
I just had mine lowered from 5400 to 5250 and the truck feels much stronger now. If you ever have a chance to look at a dyno chart you will see how much power you start loosing at the end of the power band.
Tha truck felt like it was winding out forever......now it gets into the next gear quicker and gets me going sooner
And if anything else.......it is WAY safer for my L now.
--Joe
Tha truck felt like it was winding out forever......now it gets into the next gear quicker and gets me going sooner
And if anything else.......it is WAY safer for my L now.
--Joe
none
For whats it's worth , i installed factory techs valve body kit , and had mark at lfp, leave torque reduction ON , and to LEAVE my line pressure alone= my tranny will last and still shifts firm , but not to firm. i personally think turning torque reduction off and messing with too much line pressure is a quick short life for the 4R100.
just my personal opinion..
just my personal opinion..
Originally posted by soap
What does that have to do with shift points.
My line pressure isn't increased at all either.
--Joe
What does that have to do with shift points.
My line pressure isn't increased at all either.
--Joe
Jim
Trending Topics
Something to consider...
Some people have put on 4 to 6# pulleys and have complained that they have run out of "steam" at anything over 5200 rpms. Here's Sal's take on that:
As for what you should be shifting at, well, that's debatable, but I use a theory that goes a lil something like this:
You always want to be in the gear with the highest horsepower, as at any given speed that will provide the most rear wheel torque. Or explained easier, the trick is to minimize the change in momentum, so you pick the rpm that changes the least in hp when you shift.
Honestly, 5500 on our trucks should net the best performance. As for it feeling like it drops off read Sal's statement above. Once you do shift at a higher rpm, you will be in a healthier sweetspot of the powerband and thus you will continue accelerating at great pace. I know it sounds like a tradeoff, but if you do the math it'll show.
Here's an old post I had that I never totally got around to completing:
https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...threadid=34302
Yesterday I toyed around w/ some new charts I had on my personal truck using the calculations in the above link, and I pretty much came up w/ 5500 shift points being best, though. I'm not sure what Sal recommends, but I know Johnny puts 5450 on most of his chips. Personally I recommend 5500 stock or w/ pulleys (so long as you have the filter to flow at the higher rpms w/ the bigger pulleys).
Last night I took my stock '02 Lightning to Mobile's 1/8 track toying w/ the idea some more. When I got to the track I programmed my Diablo chip I had laying around from my '01 for my '02. I left stock shiftpoints so it would shift before the traps (this was at an approx. 600 ft. track - a short 1/8), and then I reprogrammed the chip to increase my rpm to 5500 and rev limiter to 6k so I could pass through the traps w/out shifting beforehand. Net result was an impressive .02 to .04 e.t. gain in favor of the higher shiftpoints. I did 2 back to back runs each way so I could compare. My mph was very similar (do not have my slips right here in front of me).
It's fun to program now that I can do it
Hope this helps
Originally posted by LightningTuner
...I have seen problems from the small filter on trucks running an extra 4 and expecially 6 psi. Problems ranged from part throttle drivability issues to power drop off at high rpm. All were fixed by switching to the larger filter.
...I have seen problems from the small filter on trucks running an extra 4 and expecially 6 psi. Problems ranged from part throttle drivability issues to power drop off at high rpm. All were fixed by switching to the larger filter.
You always want to be in the gear with the highest horsepower, as at any given speed that will provide the most rear wheel torque. Or explained easier, the trick is to minimize the change in momentum, so you pick the rpm that changes the least in hp when you shift.
Honestly, 5500 on our trucks should net the best performance. As for it feeling like it drops off read Sal's statement above. Once you do shift at a higher rpm, you will be in a healthier sweetspot of the powerband and thus you will continue accelerating at great pace. I know it sounds like a tradeoff, but if you do the math it'll show.
Here's an old post I had that I never totally got around to completing:
https://www.f150online.com/forums/sh...threadid=34302
Yesterday I toyed around w/ some new charts I had on my personal truck using the calculations in the above link, and I pretty much came up w/ 5500 shift points being best, though. I'm not sure what Sal recommends, but I know Johnny puts 5450 on most of his chips. Personally I recommend 5500 stock or w/ pulleys (so long as you have the filter to flow at the higher rpms w/ the bigger pulleys).
Last night I took my stock '02 Lightning to Mobile's 1/8 track toying w/ the idea some more. When I got to the track I programmed my Diablo chip I had laying around from my '01 for my '02. I left stock shiftpoints so it would shift before the traps (this was at an approx. 600 ft. track - a short 1/8), and then I reprogrammed the chip to increase my rpm to 5500 and rev limiter to 6k so I could pass through the traps w/out shifting beforehand. Net result was an impressive .02 to .04 e.t. gain in favor of the higher shiftpoints. I did 2 back to back runs each way so I could compare. My mph was very similar (do not have my slips right here in front of me).
It's fun to program now that I can do it

Hope this helps
Last edited by BfB; Jul 24, 2002 at 01:06 PM.
I've done street car (mostly stock-to-light mods) dragstrip racing for years. And I can tell you I've only run accross one car in that time that did not net a better ET by "buzzing" first gear & maybe 2nd. As stated above it is slightly over revving, however you are in a better spot on the torque curve when the next gear engages.
I've done 1/4's hundreds of times & know what I've observed. (not done a L yet though)
Now I can't wait til Fri to give this beast a try!
I've done 1/4's hundreds of times & know what I've observed. (not done a L yet though)
Now I can't wait til Fri to give this beast a try!
Originally posted by wydopnthrtl
I've done street car (mostly stock-to-light mods) dragstrip racing for years. And I can tell you I've only run accross one car in that time that did not net a better ET by "buzzing" first gear & maybe 2nd. As stated above it is slightly over revving, however you are in a better spot on the torque curve when the next gear engages.
I've done 1/4's hundreds of times & know what I've observed. (not done a L yet though)
Now I can't wait til Fri to give this beast a try!
I've done street car (mostly stock-to-light mods) dragstrip racing for years. And I can tell you I've only run accross one car in that time that did not net a better ET by "buzzing" first gear & maybe 2nd. As stated above it is slightly over revving, however you are in a better spot on the torque curve when the next gear engages.
I've done 1/4's hundreds of times & know what I've observed. (not done a L yet though)
Now I can't wait til Fri to give this beast a try!
Also.....I feel that I am adding life to my motor by putting less stress on it from high revving.
WOT.....you should go to Milan tonight for T&T, we will all be there from 4-9. There will be quite a few fast L's there. It would be great to meet a new Michigan L owner.
--Joe
Re: Something to consider...
Originally posted by BfB
I left stock shiftpoints so it would shift before the traps (this was at an approx. 600 ft. track - a short 1/8), and then I increased my rpm to 5500 and rev limiter to 6k so I could pass through the traps w/out shifting beforehand. Net result was an impressive .02 to .04 e.t. gain in favor of the higher shiftpoints. I did 2 back to back runs each way so I could compare. My mph was very similar (do not have my slips right here in front of me).
Hope this helps
I left stock shiftpoints so it would shift before the traps (this was at an approx. 600 ft. track - a short 1/8), and then I increased my rpm to 5500 and rev limiter to 6k so I could pass through the traps w/out shifting beforehand. Net result was an impressive .02 to .04 e.t. gain in favor of the higher shiftpoints. I did 2 back to back runs each way so I could compare. My mph was very similar (do not have my slips right here in front of me).
Hope this helps
--Joe
EDIT........This is a great topic, much better than the usual
1) Which wax should I use
2) 03 Cobra times
etc
We need to discuss some technical issues more often.
Last edited by soap; Jul 24, 2002 at 12:40 PM.
Re: Re: Something to consider...
Originally posted by soap
I think that is too much rpm's for our trucks. I would rather sacrifice .02-.04 (.04-.08 in the 1/4) to drive my L longer without any worries.
I think that is too much rpm's for our trucks. I would rather sacrifice .02-.04 (.04-.08 in the 1/4) to drive my L longer without any worries.
EDIT........This is a great topic, much better than the usual
The whole reason i brought this up was when had my chip burned, i hadnt owned the truck to long. Didnt really know the shift points. I think its set to high imho on this chip. So im trying to narrow this down.
I do plan on throwing a 4# pulley on here soon.
Is there any things that should be changed in this chip program for shifting? I know he made it firmer. Any kind of #'s or codes he can punch in?
BTW. This is a Diablo Chip.
I do plan on throwing a 4# pulley on here soon.
Is there any things that should be changed in this chip program for shifting? I know he made it firmer. Any kind of #'s or codes he can punch in?
BTW. This is a Diablo Chip.
In the for what it's worth dept:
I was running a 2lber and shifting at 5500. Like abunch of fella L owners I was worried about " them thar rods." After speaking to Sal, I went to a 4lber and lowered my shifts down to 5200. Now I have no info to back it up, but the truck STILL feels strong on the street As for the .02 to .04 I might be leaving in the chip, well, I sleep better at night
I was running a 2lber and shifting at 5500. Like abunch of fella L owners I was worried about " them thar rods." After speaking to Sal, I went to a 4lber and lowered my shifts down to 5200. Now I have no info to back it up, but the truck STILL feels strong on the street As for the .02 to .04 I might be leaving in the chip, well, I sleep better at night


