Lightning

Spike Engineering Alignment Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 10:21 AM
  #1  
Chikenears's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
Spike Engineering Alignment Question

Spike,

Since you seem to be a suspension specialist I need to know if these specs look right for a 2001 Lightning front end alignment. I need to have mine aligned today and I'm hoping that you can help me decide on what specs to use.

My truck is lowered 2" in the front and 3" in the rear. I have Herb's washers and the cam bolt kits to install too.

I found these specs on NLOC and would like to know if they're correct. They were listed under a thread about a *2000 L*, mine's a 2001.

SVT Spec:

L.H. Caster: 6.9 +/- 1.0 Deg.
R.H. Caster: 7.4 +/- 1.0 Deg.
L.H. Camber: -0.5 +/- 0.7 Deg.
R.H. Camber: -0.5 +/- 0,7 Deg.
L.H. Toe: -0.05 +/- 0.15
R.H. Toe: -0.05 +/- 0.15

Thanks,

Tim PS. I'm looking for a normal everyday street alignment.
 

Last edited by Chikenears; Apr 8, 2002 at 10:26 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 10:45 AM
  #2  
NeedFourSpeed's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
From: In a House, USA
I'm having my Hotchkis springs put on today and will be getting an alignment.

The specs you have are for any L.

I also have some specs that have been called "preferred." I thought I would give them a try. If I don't like it I will go back to stock.

LH Caster 6.9
RH Caster 7.2
LH Camber -0.5
RH Camber -0.5
LH Toe -0.05
RH Toe -0.05
 

Last edited by NeedFourSpeed; Apr 8, 2002 at 10:49 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 01:07 PM
  #3  
Chikenears's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
Thanks NeedFourSpeed, anybody else use these "prefered" specs?
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 01:27 PM
  #4  
NeedFourSpeed's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
From: In a House, USA
I screwed up! My appointment is next Monday. I was really looking forward to getting them on today.

Chickenears - The post where I got those specs also listed specs for autocross. The preferred specs seemed to be somewhere in between the two.

I'm guessing they are a comprimise between better handling and tire wear issues.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 01:47 PM
  #5  
thulsadoom's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
From: Northern California
Nope! You can rest asurred that when I finally get around to getting a hotchkis setup, I will use the perferred and let you know what I think!
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 01:52 PM
  #6  
awhittle's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: Mid West
The camber may be a little low. -.75 may be better.

Andy
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 02:21 PM
  #7  
NeedFourSpeed's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
From: In a House, USA
Andy -

Interesting, the Auto - X spec I have shows -0.7.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 8, 2002 | 04:40 PM
  #8  
awhittle's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: Mid West
The reason I say that is my L wore out the outside of one front tire faster than the other one. The one that wore well was at -.75 deg

Andy
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2002 | 08:12 PM
  #9  
E3LilE8Harv29's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Great White North/Canada
Question

How soon after installing drop kit should you do alignment? I was told to drive for a bit first which is not to informative. I did notice the suspension settled.Installed BELLTECH 3/4 kit Friday and drove a couple hundred miles tops. Mostly puttin'! I really don't want to wear out the fronts as quick as the back! lmao Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 02:58 AM
  #10  
Spike Engineering's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 1
From: NorCal
Since you've lowered it, the alignment specs by SVT don't actually apply anymore, but they're close enough. I've adjusted the spec several times but unlike Ruslow, I don't have my own alignment gizmatron so it can get expensive. I've have run with -1.0 deg camber at the track and since my street tires only had about 2000 to 3000 miles wear left, I didn't change it back. Consequently, the tires didn't even last 1000 miles. Grip was better on the corners but I'm unsure how much it affected braking. With better brakes, I think that much negative camber would hurt traction/braking. The best thing to do is have it aligned and see how it feels.

Spike
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2002 | 09:35 AM
  #11  
Chikenears's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,652
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
Originally posted by Spike Engineering
Since you've lowered it, the alignment specs by SVT don't actually apply anymore, but they're close enough. I've adjusted the spec several times but unlike Ruslow, I don't have my own alignment gizmatron so it can get expensive. I've have run with -1.0 deg camber at the track and since my street tires only had about 2000 to 3000 miles wear left, I didn't change it back. Consequently, the tires didn't even last 1000 miles. Grip was better on the corners but I'm unsure how much it affected braking. With better brakes, I think that much negative camber would hurt traction/braking. The best thing to do is have it aligned and see how it feels.

Spike
Spike,

Thanks a bunch. I guess I'll use the SVT specs, since I'm more concerned with tire wear than anything else, but I'll talk to my alignment guy about it first to see what he thinks.

I just wanted to know if I was in the ballpark. Thanks again

Tim
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:11 PM.