Lightning

lightning vs. contour?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-15-2002, 03:11 PM
kitbuf's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb lightning vs. contour?

Ok, here's the deal. There is this guy around my town that claims his brother-in-law has some kind of high-performance contour (I believe) that will run like 160 mph or something. That was all he said about the car other than he could beat my stock L with this stock contour. Does any of you know the specs on this (limited edition) contour that this guy might have and how fast they are. Was just wondering what kind of smack he is talking. Btw, I dont think he realizes just how quick these 5,000 lbs. trucks are. thanx for the info.
 
  #2  
Old 01-15-2002, 03:16 PM
11secL's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA--DAMN PROUD OF IT
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have to laugh very hard on this one!!!! All the contours I have ever seen have run low to mid 15's at the track. Pretty much ricer competition but no contest for an L. You would whip him very badly if you raced him stock for stock.
 
  #3  
Old 01-15-2002, 03:19 PM
01Lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 1,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI, this was copied from the SVT website:

2000 SVT Contour

ENGINE
Type 60° V-6
Bore x stroke 82.4mm x 79mm
Displacement: 2496cc/152cid
Compression ratio: 10.25:1
Horsepower: 200 hp @ 6600 rpm
Torque: 169 lbs.-ft. @ 5500 rpm

SUSPENSION
FRONT: MacPherson strut, lower A-arm, coil spring
REAR: Multi-link type, strut, with one lower trailing arm

BRAKES
FRONT: 10.94 in. vented disc, single-piston calipers
REAR: 9.88 in. vented disc, single-piston caliper (• Four channel, four sensor system)

WHEELS AND TIRES
WHEELS: 16 in. x 6.5 in. cast aluminum 5-spoke
TIRES: BFGoodrich™ g-Force T/A KDW 215/50ZR-16

PERFORMANCE
0-60 mph: 7.6 seconds
Top Speed: 143 mph

PRODUCTION NUMBERS
Black 832; Red 386; Silver 725; Green 207; TOTAL: 2150



--As you can see, quite a little performer, but no competition for the Lightning!
 

Last edited by 01Lightning; 01-15-2002 at 03:24 PM.
  #4  
Old 01-15-2002, 03:19 PM
Spike Engineering's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: NorCal
Posts: 1,723
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

It's probably the SVT Contour. You'd be surprised if you ran against it on a road course. Regarding the "straight-line-don't-use-your-brakes-or-the-steering-wheel" type of race...

Spike
 

Last edited by Spike Engineering; 01-15-2002 at 03:28 PM.
  #5  
Old 01-15-2002, 03:35 PM
SVT SE-R's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: lightning vs. contour?

Originally posted by kitbuf
That was all he said about the car other than he could beat my stock L with this stock contour.
You know, you could win a great deal of money on this one.
 
  #6  
Old 01-15-2002, 03:37 PM
11secL's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA--DAMN PROUD OF IT
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Re: lightning vs. contour?

Originally posted by SVT SE-R


You know, you could win a great deal of money on this one.
LMAO!! My thoughts exactly!!!
 
  #7  
Old 01-15-2002, 03:43 PM
lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: KS
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have both lightning and svtc and i can asure you, youll beat him in a straight line race, but when you get into the twisties youll be in trouble if the guy in the stvc can drive. I have admitt the svtc is a real kick in the butt to drive.
 
  #8  
Old 01-15-2002, 03:49 PM
kitbuf's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok guys thanx for the info.lmao. I thought this guy was a bullsh$ter, especially when he said it would run 160mph. I guess I will let him keep talking ---- until I hand him his a$$ in a 1/4 drag out. Might can talk him into upping the stakes a bit. Oh well, looks like its going to be fun, for me anyway. thanx for the info. I knew I could count on you all for fast replys. I will let you know how it turns out when I meet up with him.later
 
  #9  
Old 01-15-2002, 04:46 PM
frank2's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Clinton Township Mi.
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Give you one guess as to what I got rid of to get my Lightning??
They are not even close!!
 
  #10  
Old 01-15-2002, 04:56 PM
MRBBQMAN's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 3,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

143 stock, and he claims it will go 160!, thats a 17mph increase, and would require modifications, to an already factory modified vehicle. someone would have to be crazy to overide the factory settings on a SVT vehicle, or something
 
  #11  
Old 01-15-2002, 04:58 PM
Redneck Ferrari's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is not a road course in the world that would afford the contour a chance in a RACING environment. The L is too fast off the corners, too fast down the straights, and can be made far too wide for the contour to pass. The only chance it would have is comparing lap times. Thats great for qualifying, but in a real world racing environment the L would win every time.
Unless, Ayrton Senna was in the contour, which even when he was alive he wouldn't drive.....Unless you had extremely deep pocket$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ to have afforded him.
 

Last edited by Redneck Ferrari; 01-15-2002 at 05:08 PM.



Quick Reply: lightning vs. contour?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:21 AM.