Turbocharge/Supercharge
Just thinking, in theory couldn't you Turbocharge our trucks? Superchargers run off intake, turbo off exhaust... Wouldn't it work?
------------------
2000 Silver Lightning
#2798 of 4966
Born on date: May 9, 2000
Email: ColinMBurns@hotmail.com
Mods: SnugLid, 20% tint, Airaid, Slush Mats, Pioneer Speakers, Zaino
My Zing Album:
http://www.zing.com/album/?id=4292665015
------------------
2000 Silver Lightning
#2798 of 4966
Born on date: May 9, 2000
Email: ColinMBurns@hotmail.com
Mods: SnugLid, 20% tint, Airaid, Slush Mats, Pioneer Speakers, Zaino
My Zing Album:
http://www.zing.com/album/?id=4292665015
Superchargers are crank driven with a belt and turbos are exhaust driven. Nearly any engine can supercharged or turbocharged. Unless you are a master fabricator you have to have a kit for it. Not aware of any 5.4L turbo kits.
------------------
Red '00 Lightning,
Power Surge Performance enhanced,
375 RWHP,
445 RWTQ,
12.974@104.818
Track Videos
------------------
Red '00 Lightning,
Power Surge Performance enhanced,
375 RWHP,
445 RWTQ,
12.974@104.818
Track Videos
Man, I'd think you'd have to weld your heads on to keep the boost from popping them off
But yes it is possible....driveable?, ah heck I'll do anything once 
------------------
LEFT ON VACATION CAME BACK ON PROBATION
But yes it is possible....driveable?, ah heck I'll do anything once 
------------------
LEFT ON VACATION CAME BACK ON PROBATION
Trending Topics
This has been done for at least the rs200 years.
Didn't that little 1.8l make like 800hp?
http://www.turbocharger.co.uk/rs-200.html
this flavor came in at 600hp
http://www.cwl.com/bensrallypage/for...ene_rs200.html
[This message has been edited by dark_horse (edited 06-06-2001).]
[This message has been edited by dark_horse (edited 06-06-2001).]
Didn't that little 1.8l make like 800hp?
http://www.turbocharger.co.uk/rs-200.html
this flavor came in at 600hp
http://www.cwl.com/bensrallypage/for...ene_rs200.html
[This message has been edited by dark_horse (edited 06-06-2001).]
[This message has been edited by dark_horse (edited 06-06-2001).]
First I'll admit that I don't know all the in's and out's of how car/truck motors work (i'm more of a two-stroke kind of guy), but don't we already have a "problem" with our intake temp (i.e. the reason for the intercooler)? Wouldn't adding a turbo on top of all this make the air charge temp hot enough to turn our blocks into "liquid hot magma"? I don't know. But I guess "Where there's a will (and a BABolt)- there's a way". later...
------------------
Being Single...
Seeing Double...
Going for the triple
(((Garrett))))
'00 Silver Lightning
'01 CR250
'00 NESC MX Amateur Champ
#65 NESC / #465 AMA
motoxer@wpi.edu
gkaye@rjagroup.com
AOL IM: GK65A
------------------
Being Single...
Seeing Double...
Going for the triple
(((Garrett))))
'00 Silver Lightning
'01 CR250
'00 NESC MX Amateur Champ
#65 NESC / #465 AMA
motoxer@wpi.edu
gkaye@rjagroup.com
AOL IM: GK65A
The real problems will come from the heat and melting the pistons. Our pistons are stock that have been fly-cut to lower the compression. The tops are way too thin. My buddy at Ford R&D clued me in. A big / low boost turbo that would feed about 2 lbs to the blower would be cool. The MAF would need to be b4 the turbo.
Just thinking
Andy
Just thinking
Andy
I believe if your gonna do a turbo do it right. 8 cyl = 4 cyl a side = 2 turbos.
You now the theory, symetrical things are more pleasing to the eye, you know like 2 pipes out the rear for exhaust, twin turbos, etc.
You now the theory, symetrical things are more pleasing to the eye, you know like 2 pipes out the rear for exhaust, twin turbos, etc.


