2001L new 1/4 Mile times with Superchip!!!
I love this guy 'you can't compare a 99-00 to a 2001' OK stop your killing me! A 2001 with a Superchip and air filter is nothing more than a 99-00 with the same and a PRO-M MAF, maybe just a little more like .1-.2 seconds. The 373's, who in the HELL doesn't have a set?
You have some major *****, dude. Your condescending attitude that changing your oil, plugs, and a few miles on a 2001 will bring you 12.6, is just insulting.
Man we've been around for almost 2 years trying everything under the sun and not one of us have gone any faster with new oil, plugs (you can search on that one for hours) or 2000 miles Hell there are maybe 20 guys reporting on this forum that can do a 12.6 and it’s not from bolt-ons, it’s from fine tuning a little of everything. You haven’t been around long enough to know but your new adversaries are mostly 99 owners, we know what’s going on with this truck, stop the RICE reports. I also suggest that you trade in your G-Tech for a 2001 ***-o-meter or will that also provide absurd results (this is funny to to the “in” folks)?
You're new to this Lightning gig and it shows. Take the above advice tuck tail, change your handle, and come back as a 2002 owner. You have lost all creditability.
BTW my day job is Mr. Nice guy. Insert pseudo smiley face here, not!
You have some major *****, dude. Your condescending attitude that changing your oil, plugs, and a few miles on a 2001 will bring you 12.6, is just insulting.
Man we've been around for almost 2 years trying everything under the sun and not one of us have gone any faster with new oil, plugs (you can search on that one for hours) or 2000 miles Hell there are maybe 20 guys reporting on this forum that can do a 12.6 and it’s not from bolt-ons, it’s from fine tuning a little of everything. You haven’t been around long enough to know but your new adversaries are mostly 99 owners, we know what’s going on with this truck, stop the RICE reports. I also suggest that you trade in your G-Tech for a 2001 ***-o-meter or will that also provide absurd results (this is funny to to the “in” folks)?
You're new to this Lightning gig and it shows. Take the above advice tuck tail, change your handle, and come back as a 2002 owner. You have lost all creditability.
BTW my day job is Mr. Nice guy. Insert pseudo smiley face here, not!
BABolt,
It looks like my post here is waking up the whole lightning community, and with very divided opinions.
Anyway, I think you are right time slips will clarify a lot.
Good luck and drive safely
FD
It looks like my post here is waking up the whole lightning community, and with very divided opinions.
Anyway, I think you are right time slips will clarify a lot.
Good luck and drive safely
FD
Mr. Igogether,
Your experience and ultimate mathematical wisdom is really too much for me.
So, Mr. Nice guy go with your wisdom to SVT and tell them that the difference between a 99 – 00 and 01 is only 1-2s, Come on dude are you trying to pull something???
FD
Your experience and ultimate mathematical wisdom is really too much for me.
So, Mr. Nice guy go with your wisdom to SVT and tell them that the difference between a 99 – 00 and 01 is only 1-2s, Come on dude are you trying to pull something???
FD
Hey FlyingDutchman, in this thread, you have been hit by the clue-bat at least a dozen times and you still don't get it. Change your handle, start over and try not to be such a knuckle-head next time!!!
99L
r9/chip
airaid
99L
r9/chip
airaid
Sonic,
You can get high octane fuel at some gas stations (local Sunoco has Turbo Blue, which is a little over 100 octane, I believe). There is also CAM2 which is ~100 octane. Look at stations close to a track and you will probably be able to find some.
Later,
Roger
You can get high octane fuel at some gas stations (local Sunoco has Turbo Blue, which is a little over 100 octane, I believe). There is also CAM2 which is ~100 octane. Look at stations close to a track and you will probably be able to find some.
Later,
Roger
To: FlyingDutchman
Why didnt you say these times were done with a g-tech in the first place? You made it sound like you did this at a track. Truly the best part I like about this forum is the presumed trust among everyone. When I saw your times I was in complete shock, and really considered for the first buying a 2001 Lightning. You made a mistake with showing your times the way you did. Maybe you should change your handle and maybe you shouldnt but the best thing you can do is fess up and see how people respond to it. Maybe you might be surprised.
------------------
2000 WHT LIGHTNING
#2013 Born 4/6/00
Stock 14.03 96.3mph
w/superchip 13.53 101.5mph
w/superchip and JL filter kit 13.23 @ 104.2
Why didnt you say these times were done with a g-tech in the first place? You made it sound like you did this at a track. Truly the best part I like about this forum is the presumed trust among everyone. When I saw your times I was in complete shock, and really considered for the first buying a 2001 Lightning. You made a mistake with showing your times the way you did. Maybe you should change your handle and maybe you shouldnt but the best thing you can do is fess up and see how people respond to it. Maybe you might be surprised.
------------------
2000 WHT LIGHTNING
#2013 Born 4/6/00
Stock 14.03 96.3mph
w/superchip 13.53 101.5mph
w/superchip and JL filter kit 13.23 @ 104.2
One thing I don't understand is if you were not trying to be misleading, why did toy post 60' times? The g-tech will give 0-60 mph times, but not 60' times, you only get that at the track.
------------------
99 red lightning, bassani complete system #1610 of 4000
2000 Lightning, PSP filter/chip, svo throttle body, Bassani, 4.10's
2000 super duty v10
Arctic cat 400 4x4
Cobra "R" #131 of 300
Moderator
www.svtperformance.com
My vehicles http://www.zing.com/album/?id=4293160925
------------------
99 red lightning, bassani complete system #1610 of 4000
2000 Lightning, PSP filter/chip, svo throttle body, Bassani, 4.10's
2000 super duty v10
Arctic cat 400 4x4
Cobra "R" #131 of 300
Moderator
www.svtperformance.com
My vehicles http://www.zing.com/album/?id=4293160925
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by WHTLIGHTN:
When I saw your times I was in complete shock, and really considered for the first buying a 2001 Lightning.
</font>
When I saw your times I was in complete shock, and really considered for the first buying a 2001 Lightning.
</font>
FWIW, I think you are seeing what you say in the display. I think you have a messed up G-Tech. My first one (that I sent back) was off some 40hp as compared to a real dyno. My current G-Tech Pro is within 2 or 3 hp of the dyno. I don't do the 1/4's very often because I don't want to kill somebody at over 100 mph on the highway.
Do yourself a favor and do a hp run too. You should see ~370-375 hp if your G-Tech is accurate.
I'm not flaming you and I'd like to know what it shows for Hp.
------------------
Jim
Black '00
#1,757 built 3/30/00
Clear corners
JDM street program
JDM 2# blower pulley (ordered)
J.L. Stage II ram-air
FRPP Oval throttle body (ordered)
90mm MAF
MagnaFlow Exhaust
[This message has been edited by gforce (edited 03-12-2001).]
[This message has been edited by gforce (edited 03-14-2001).]
Wow, that was a very misleading post. I'm sure you got alot of us to think the 01 runs much stronger than it really does.
You stated that you went to the "strip"--that surely implied to everyone that you went to an actual 1/4 mile track.
You did not indicate those were g-tech times.
You posted 60' foot times and according to bggroth the g-tech does not have that function (I do not have a g-tech, therefore I do not know if your unit has that function or not), but if it doesn't, then wow, how do you post that info without data.
After reading this post and seeing all the responses, some people with favorable responses and other's not, it now opens my eyes and make me seriously question everyone's best time in their sigs. If some best times shown are track times, some are Gtech and some are Vericom, then nobody really knows what anyones actual performance of their vehicle is. I guess it would be nice for everyone's best time in their sig to be qualified with the method this time was obtained.
You stated that you went to the "strip"--that surely implied to everyone that you went to an actual 1/4 mile track.
You did not indicate those were g-tech times.
You posted 60' foot times and according to bggroth the g-tech does not have that function (I do not have a g-tech, therefore I do not know if your unit has that function or not), but if it doesn't, then wow, how do you post that info without data.
After reading this post and seeing all the responses, some people with favorable responses and other's not, it now opens my eyes and make me seriously question everyone's best time in their sigs. If some best times shown are track times, some are Gtech and some are Vericom, then nobody really knows what anyones actual performance of their vehicle is. I guess it would be nice for everyone's best time in their sig to be qualified with the method this time was obtained.
I stated that I run my first times with a G-Tech, If I want to compare, YOU ALL KNOW VERY WELL THE 2 TIME IT WILL BE WITH A G-TEGH TO. In the beginning of this thread, some people even mentioned it.
"FlyingDutchman posted his first runs earlier and those were G-Tech times."
HANKFAN
Like I stated next time I will post time slips.
FD
"FlyingDutchman posted his first runs earlier and those were G-Tech times."
HANKFAN
Like I stated next time I will post time slips.
FD


