Lightning

hey guys on a budget LOOK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 05:05 PM
  #16  
tlfwatch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/ LIGHTNING FAST
Talking As For My Lightning Nothing But The Best

Originally Posted by Odin's Wrath
If you're planning on keeping your Lightning, you need to get the highest grade stainless headers. They'll last a lot longer. If you are just going to beat the hell out of it, and pass it on to some poor sap in a couple of years, the el cheapos will be just fine.

I only want the best for my LIGHTNING the quality is long remembered long after the $price is forgotten.IF you can afford it buy the best. now thats my logic.////////////////////////////////////LIGHTNING FAST. TOM
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #17  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Originally Posted by tlfwatch
I only want the best for my LIGHTNING the quality is long remembered long after the $price is forgotten.IF you can afford it buy the best. now thats my logic.////////////////////////////////////LIGHTNING FAST. TOM

Not to mention that if you go cheap, you may have to buy again sooner than you think.
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 06:33 PM
  #18  
lightninquick's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 0
i wouldnt call a guy a sap for buying a lightning with unstainless headers

good find richeee
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 07:14 PM
  #19  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Originally Posted by lightninquick
i wouldnt call a guy a sap for buying a lightning with unstainless headers

good find richeee
Like he would even know they weren't stainless 'til he had to replace them. If you're going to do it cheap, somebody's gonna have to fix it later. You or the next guy.
 
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 07:20 PM
  #20  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
Originally Posted by Master Of Pain
headers aren't going to do jack squat for you if you're under 500 RWHP, except loose low end torque and HP.
I have to disagree. On my N/A 5.4, I gained 30hp and 35ftlbs torque and didnt loose power anywhere. You cant argue with the dyno.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 12:34 AM
  #21  
B-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 3
From: Eastern TN
You are saying you picked up 30hp & 35tq just by bolting on a set of headers ??

Rightttttttt......
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 11:32 AM
  #22  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
yea I did. I had gibson shorties, didnt gain a single hp or ftlb of torque, I put on the dynatech long tube kit and put it back on the dyno. 30hp, 35ftlb gain.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 11:58 AM
  #23  
B-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 3
From: Eastern TN
Well, I guess you have a miracle truck - A close friend of mine has a Lightning ('04). All the standard mods (pulley, CAI, cat-back, tune, etc.). 405 HP at the wheels.....

He bought the complete Dynatech exhaust system: long tube headers, high flow cats (deleted two of the cats) and the Dynatech cat back.

While we were at it, we installed a Steigmeier ported Eaton.

With the new exhaust AND ported Eaton, he picked up 32 HP... The ported Eaton alone should have constituted between 25 and 30 HP of that equation.... Some guys report 35 HP gains with the ported Eaton alone.

In other words, the exhaust did not appear to add very much power at all. I questioned your increase because a Lightning motor is moving WAY MORE air than your N/A motor and it didn't add 30HP here ???

Headers just don't seem to add that much, at lower power levels. This has been observed MANY MANY times by lots of folks on this board.

Glad it worked for you though.
 
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 12:06 PM
  #24  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
thats very strange. did he get custom tuning for the ported eaton and headers? thats going to flow a lot more air than mine for sure. The difference was night and day for me, and i put it on the dyno to prove the seat of the pants feel, and sure enough, I gained 30hp
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #25  
twb02lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, TX
I'm with you built54, can't seem to get the messege across to some people. It's been said and proven that long tubes make considerably more power in the low- mid range, some quote in upwards to 40-50 gain in this RPM. And if that is true then your pulling away from your foe a ell of a lot harder and faster than if you did not have them. Peak I think is what most are set on in only gaining small power, but how long is your truck at peak?
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #26  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
My torque is pretty flat from 3k-4500, it doesnt drop off much, but its a strong steady power
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 06:16 PM
  #27  
B-Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,558
Likes: 3
From: Eastern TN
Originally Posted by twb02lightning
I'm with you built54, can't seem to get the messege across to some people. It's been said and proven that long tubes make considerably more power in the low- mid range, some quote in upwards to 40-50 gain in this RPM. And if that is true then your pulling away from your foe a ell of a lot harder and faster than if you did not have them. Peak I think is what most are set on in only gaining small power, but how long is your truck at peak?
Get what across to some people ? I gave you the FACTS - we added the long tubes and ported Eaton and picked up 32 HP...

Do a search on here - the # of folks who lost HP and torque when adding longtubes FAR outnumber the ones who report large gains - UNLESS they are doing the built block / Whipple or KB / heads and cams treatment.

Yes, Sam @ Coastal Dyno did the tuning and he has lots of experience with modular motors, both in Lightnings and Mustangs. (He tunes AFChad's L, which is putting 510 HP to the wheels on a stock block)

Like I said, I'm glad it worked so well for you , but it definitely isn't the norm with bolt-on modded engines.
 
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #28  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
well I believe your facts, but my facts are that I gained 30hp and 35ftlbs.
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 03:54 AM
  #29  
DirtY_Dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: DelrayBeach
Originally Posted by built54
well I believe your facts, but my facts are that I gained 30hp and 35ftlbs.

ill have to agree with you bud...I just cant see helping a motor FLOW better and then loose power.. even with a supercharged motor, I have the bassani shorts on my truck when i get the long tubes i will put it on a dyno and make a new post..
 
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 06:57 AM
  #30  
built54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,282
Likes: 1
From: Farmington, MO
Yea, do that because I no longer have my previous dyno chart or id have it up in a second. Why would I Lie about this?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:50 PM.