Lightning

The dispute is settled!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 11:54 AM
  #1  
Pacecar18's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, CO USA
Post The dispute is settled!

It's finally been decided so everyone can stop arguing about it. The 2000 have bigger nuts than the '99 Lightnings. The bigger the nuts the faster they go!

Fordsales said it himself

Check it out https://www.f150online.com/f150board...ML/003835.html

[This message has been edited by Pacecar18 (edited 06-07-2000).]
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 01:04 PM
  #2  
Pacecar18's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, CO USA
Post

BBQMAN

You should get some sleep if your having visions like that!

Watch out his LIGHTNING flash ear bite. That's his power move!
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 01:32 PM
  #3  
DHFerguson's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Post

I think bigger nuts makes for more rotating mass and thus more horsepower is required to overcome the higher inertia. No wonder the 1999’s are faster!
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 01:36 PM
  #4  
Twisted99's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
From: South East USA
Cool

Just more unsprung mass.

My nuts is lighter thus they are easier to Get off......
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 01:42 PM
  #5  
FORDSALES's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,947
Likes: 0
From: HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA
Post

I have heard for years that "the bigger the better"

------------------
Jim

jim@jimshaw.cc

www.cars-n-trucks.com/lightning.htm
Black 00, Superchip, clear corners, super whites
Airaid w/Big Mouth filter, chrome wheels, AIM 2" drop shackles
2000 E320, 1993 Cobra R, 1959 Corvette, 1949 Plymouth Coupe

Looking for a better paying job to support my L

 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 01:43 PM
  #6  
LightningDammitt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 525
Likes: 0
From: Bryan, Texas
Post

I agree with DH and Twisted.

Bigger AND TIGHTER! They're so tight they haven't DESCENDED...
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 01:51 PM
  #7  
98_SVT_COBRA's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, OH
Post

AAAWW NUTS! But that means the '99s have less rotating mass than the '00s. That explains why the '99s are quicker.

------------------
99 Lightning black #2022, cd,tow package,bed rug,roll-n-lock
(13.73 @ 99.74 stock)
98 Cobra coupe laser red
best stock et 13.43 @ 103
one run w/ 3.55 gears 13.34 @ 102 no other mods
former Chevy fan still have a few
72 SS454 11.6 @ 116 (slicks open headers)
68 Camaro 12.2 @ 116 (street tires closed exhast)


 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 01:58 PM
  #8  
Pacecar18's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, CO USA
Post

It is true that they may have less rotating mass, but we all know bigger nuts can produce more power and torque.

Forward thrust is much more important than the rotational mass since you can rotate all you want, but it won't make you thrust any harder.

Bwahhahahahaaha

 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 02:41 PM
  #9  
noelvm's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx, USA
Talking

It's a lot easier at the strip to make 100 lbs with a 4-bar spinner than it is to make 150. One grunt instead of four.

------------------
99.5 Red Ligntning, Syn Oil, Eldebrock 5512 muffler, BFG drag radials, Bugflector, G&H Lens covers,
70 Vette LS-6


 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 04:34 PM
  #10  
Y2K 7700 4x4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: Kalamazoo, MI, USA
Post

Somebody better ask AndThenSomeToo -- She'll surely have an opinion.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 08:38 PM
  #11  
KGM's Avatar
KGM
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas , NV
Question

And what does CA think about all of this?
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 11:48 PM
  #12  
noelvm's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx, USA
Talking

Woman don't know much about measurements because men have been telling them for years that 7 inches is really 12 inches.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2000 | 11:58 PM
  #13  
PFA's Avatar
PFA
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 1,557
Likes: 0
From: Belleville, MI
Post

But those 4 grunts could have better results than the 1 grunt...
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2000 | 12:02 AM
  #14  
BadBolt's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
From: Downriver, Michigan
Talking

By bigger nuts, you mean that the studs are larger also.
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2000 | 12:04 AM
  #15  
Pacecar18's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Longmont, CO USA
Post

Yes they would be and and everyone knows the truck with the bigger nuts always wins. lol
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 AM.