Franken-Plenum testing/ Flame on
Originally Posted by typhoon43
That's this intake right? I thought you said the fur raised the IAT2's by about 20 degrees. Have you shaved it yet? 



Son of F-P?
If someone wants to send me a C&L or a fab. one I will test and return.
I just got home, been drinking at beedubs (Buffalo Wild Wings) got another beer and spit half of it on the cp screen. That was some funny shiza. And yes, the fur raised IAT2 temps, but the iced intercooler kept it down a little.
Originally Posted by olefafl
With the stock one on when I went into boost, it would go to 7psi vacuum. This is at the upper, where the pvc valve goes in.
With F-P it would go to 2psi vacuum.
If I am thinking right, that is a better flow? Does that mean that the upper is flowing almost as much as the blower wants?
With F-P it would go to 2psi vacuum.
If I am thinking right, that is a better flow? Does that mean that the upper is flowing almost as much as the blower wants?
Vacuum measurements can increase if they are taken at a high flow area. The velocity at the opening creates a localized pressure drop. Your F-P is larger in cross section and thus it'll have lower velocities at most points. Try to be sure you take all vacuum readings at some point with the lowest possible flow. This will best represent the actual vacuum.
Both reading were at the same spot, guage, and hose. If you look at the pic. you can see the hose. I just pulled it out of the stocker, and put it right back in F-P.
Long before F-P I did the stock airbox 2 hose thing and a K&N. Nothing changed but the upper.
Long before F-P I did the stock airbox 2 hose thing and a K&N. Nothing changed but the upper.
Honestly, the test needs to be done on a dyno, with the same truck, on the same day. Any other test has too many inconsistancies and variables.
The vacuum test is interesting, but I also think it's not a fair test of performance increase. If you put a larger area before the inlet of your blower, you ARE going to drop in vacuum because you are drawing the same amount of air in, but through a larger space. You are not increasing the air taken in, because the size of the blower inlet has not changed. So I believe your vacuum readings to be correct, but I don't feel they related to anything else.
Again, you'd need to dyno test it to see if it actually raised the hp.
The vacuum test is interesting, but I also think it's not a fair test of performance increase. If you put a larger area before the inlet of your blower, you ARE going to drop in vacuum because you are drawing the same amount of air in, but through a larger space. You are not increasing the air taken in, because the size of the blower inlet has not changed. So I believe your vacuum readings to be correct, but I don't feel they related to anything else.
Again, you'd need to dyno test it to see if it actually raised the hp.
I posted this on the H-D forum some time ago
"I took off .5 sec with that "thing" and a 2lbs upper. My best was 14.1X, at 2 different tracks, on different days. Now its 13.6, with no traction."
If you want I can ship it to you to test.
I did open up the blower side a little, I used a gasket for sizing. The TB side didn't need opening. Even if I opened up the blower side to a KB size, the TB side would still limit the air flow. No matter what was done, how it was made, ect.
I just didn't want to spend $200-600 and get the same thing. It was also fun to do, nobody can see if it I don't open my hood.
"I took off .5 sec with that "thing" and a 2lbs upper. My best was 14.1X, at 2 different tracks, on different days. Now its 13.6, with no traction."
If you want I can ship it to you to test.
I did open up the blower side a little, I used a gasket for sizing. The TB side didn't need opening. Even if I opened up the blower side to a KB size, the TB side would still limit the air flow. No matter what was done, how it was made, ect.
I just didn't want to spend $200-600 and get the same thing. It was also fun to do, nobody can see if it I don't open my hood.


