FYI re: Whipple compressor shortages
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 1
From: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
FYI re: Whipple compressor shortages
Whipple may be telling the truth about its inability to get compressors from Lysholm.
Today I found a federal case in the Eastern District of California. The date of filing is unknown, as it was originally filed in California state court. It was transferred to federal court just a few days ago. While the complaint was not available online, Opcon/Autorotor/Lysholm's motion to dismiss and transfer the case to Sweden was.
That motion recites that "Whipple brought suit . . . alleging that Lysholm failed to fill Whipple's orders." The complaint seeks "damages of $15,000,000," "specific performance [a court order that the defendant fulfill the contract]," and "an injunction requiring Defendants to stop selling superchargers to two customers." I cannot tell who the two customers are without reading the complaint.
Today I found a federal case in the Eastern District of California. The date of filing is unknown, as it was originally filed in California state court. It was transferred to federal court just a few days ago. While the complaint was not available online, Opcon/Autorotor/Lysholm's motion to dismiss and transfer the case to Sweden was.
That motion recites that "Whipple brought suit . . . alleging that Lysholm failed to fill Whipple's orders." The complaint seeks "damages of $15,000,000," "specific performance [a court order that the defendant fulfill the contract]," and "an injunction requiring Defendants to stop selling superchargers to two customers." I cannot tell who the two customers are without reading the complaint.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
That motion recites that "Whipple brought suit . . . alleging that Lysholm failed to fill Whipple's orders." The complaint seeks "damages of $15,000,000," "specific performance [a court order that the defendant fulfill the contract]," and "an injunction requiring Defendants to stop selling superchargers to two customers." I cannot tell who the two customers are without reading the complaint.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: miami florida u.s.
Definitely ford at least.Imagine how much less problems ford would have if the factory vehicles that came w/ a s/c were whipple as opposed to roots.The cooler post charge temps would provide a greater cushion for the peeps that like to add chips and higher psi pulleys,and then take them off to for warranty work.Also I beleive ford owns land rover???Correct me if Im wrong 
..But the new land rover is available s/charged....
..But the new land rover is available s/charged....
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Warwick R.I.
Originally Posted by ganiman
Definitely ford at least.Imagine how much less problems ford would have if the factory vehicles that came w/ a s/c were whipple as opposed to roots.The cooler post charge temps would provide a greater cushion for the peeps that like to add chips and higher psi pulleys,and then take them off to for warranty work.Also I beleive ford owns land rover???Correct me if Im wrong ..But the new land rover is available s/charged....
..But the new land rover is available s/charged....Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,097
Likes: 0
From: DETROIT, (formerly Eaton County, Michigan)
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
My money's on 35th Pony and Ryan Allen.
ding ding...
Luckly not everyone who got one posted online!
I couldn't pull it up on lexis or westlaw... (damn limited subscription)
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 1
From: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
Originally Posted by l-menace
. . . I couldn't pull it up on lexis or westlaw...
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
I heard it through the grapevine that Whipple had sued Lysholm. So I used PACER and pulled up the docket. I don't think that it will hit Westlaw or LEXIS until there is some written decision.
http://www.nloc.net/forum/showthread...threadid=99822
Everyone was quick to state it was hearsay and BS, when it fact it was true. Even you stated:
Gimme a break. There is no indication whatsoever that anyone from Kenne Bell had anything to do with this post. It was just a damn joke. That's how rumors get started.
As I said earlier, it's Ford and Mercury Marine who Whipple is requesting an injunction on.
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 1
From: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
Originally Posted by silverzz28
Well, it was posted on NLOC remember?
http://www.nloc.net/forum/showthread...threadid=99822
Everyone was quick to state it was hearsay and BS, when it fact it was true. Even you stated:
LOL! I bet you were a lil shocked to read the PACER report. . . .
http://www.nloc.net/forum/showthread...threadid=99822
Everyone was quick to state it was hearsay and BS, when it fact it was true. Even you stated:
LOL! I bet you were a lil shocked to read the PACER report. . . .
The post you reference above was some one-post newbie posting hearsay about Whipple being in financial trouble. My comment was in response to someone joking that Jim Bell had something to do with the post and then someone adopting that as a rumor -- and nothing else.
Do you even think about things before you post?
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
From: Webster, TX
I wonder why Lysholm is failing to follow through with their mfg. commitments?
Compressors are their core competency. If they can't produce to meet demand, then as a company they are seriously deficient. Sounds like they need to pickup some licensees worldwide and get production up.
Compressors are their core competency. If they can't produce to meet demand, then as a company they are seriously deficient. Sounds like they need to pickup some licensees worldwide and get production up.
