Lightning

Just got off the phone w/Accufab Tech.....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 06:54 AM
  #16  
Rob_02Lightning's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 11,153
Likes: 0
From: Selden NY
Well said Tim

Blown, if this Prob Started when you put the T/B on,
the answer is very simple, you simply have a bad T/B.

As said (and everyone's agreeing), mine was off by a mile and ran great, yet when I set it up according to the Method Shown,
there was no noticable change and to date mine continue's to work flawless.
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 08:41 AM
  #17  
Blown347Hatch's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
I need to send it back and try another one, I guess.

What about Billet Flow? Anybody feel they are better than Accufab?

Tim. My reaction was the same as yours. I even told the guy something to the same effect as you, that the throttle body makes approx 5-10 HP and he even argued with me on that. He argued with me on that, claiming 20-30HP.


Rob. Is your idle 700 RPM in neutral, and 600 in drive?
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 09:43 AM
  #18  
Silver_2000's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,798
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Originally posted by Tim Skelton
"Disregard the 'factory idle speed' RPM. It's not a 'factory' engine anymore. It has alot more CFM of air going into it."

What a load of crap.

A stupid throttle body is not going to supply any more CFM unless the engine is asking for it. By itself it is meaningless.

Not a "factory engine anymore" because I installed a mod that might make 5 rwHP on a good day?

Hard to imagine that bozos like this can stay in business.
Im confused - if you open the throttle body to let more air in the engine revs - so is the dog wagging the tail or is the tail wagging the dog... ?

Doug
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 12:13 PM
  #19  
Blown347Hatch's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally posted by Silver_2000_!
Im confused - if you open the throttle body to let more air in the engine revs - so is the dog wagging the tail or is the tail wagging the dog... ?

Doug


Bottom line is, it appears we (I) am being told anything by Accufab in order for them to justify standing behind their product, regardless of how far off the mark it might be, in relation to running half decent. Even when you methodically install their product by correct procedure, it doesn't work. So, what is their explanation? Throw procedure out the window. It just doesn't make any sense.
 
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #20  
motleycrue's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
maybe you could buy one that comes with a TPS sensor already set
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 12:51 AM
  #21  
Blown347Hatch's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Originally posted by motleycrue
maybe you could buy one that comes with a TPS sensor already set
But, I know how to set one.......
 
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2004 | 08:52 AM
  #22  
Robert Francis's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
From: SE Michigan
I've had the Accufab SBTB for several years and when I first installed the idle speed would hang up at about 1100rpm and then tend to drift down - so I bent the throttle spring bracket back a bit and idle speed immediately dropped down to about 700 in neutral - and has stayed that way ever since - and the throttle blade doesn't stick either. But I've noted several on here that have had problems with the Accufab and idle speed and when they switch back to their original - everythings fine, so it would seem that we're not all getting the same quality in this unit. Sure seems like odd advice from them - that the tps voltage is irrevalent as the "computer" still "looking" for throttle position and adjusting accordingly. I checked my TPS voltage and it measured at about .96 volts - so I filed the tps screw openings a bit and adjusted it to what "my meter measured" at .99. But my meter isn't real expensive so I'd guess my tps voltage is "really" somewhere between about .98 - 1.01 volts at closed position. After I did this, I didn't notice any change in idle speed or anything else - and I really didn't expect to as I initially measured at .96 volts and I knew the meter wasn't terribly accurate. If it had turned out that the voltage as initially measued was around .8 volts or so - I would think that would have made a difference in idle speed. I think unless you have a really accurate meter, lets say accurate within +- .1% - trying to fuss around a lot between .985 and .995 is probably not going to result in any real change in performance.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 AM.