Lightning

How To: 5.4 Engine Assembly (Photos)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #91  
LightningTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,438
Likes: 1
From: Palm Coast, FL
Originally Posted by Struck in AZ
Sal,

I wasn't inferring anything at all about the tuning and I'm sorry if you took it as a slight. I thought it was common knowledge that the ring end gaps were too tight for the planned nitrous use and spraying the thing just brought about its early demise. I was just making a simple comment that it didn't live long after being dynoed...and apparently it was dynoed several times.
Not a problem . But you could have just said "it blew up shortly after being on the dyno".
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2008 | 11:29 PM
  #92  
1fast4.6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, Missouri
Thats what happens when you dont do your homework.
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #93  
todd abbott's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Milford Connecticut
You know Chris this thread has dam 17 thousand hits, your a star man!! keep the pic's coming.
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 06:03 PM
  #94  
Struck in AZ's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 6
From: Cave Creek, AZ
Originally Posted by todd abbott
You know Chris this thread has dam 17 thousand hits, your a star man!! keep the pic's coming.
Ummm...look at the date of the original post man. Chris sold his truck a year or two ago so I don't think there will be anymore pics coming.
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 06:28 PM
  #95  
todd abbott's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Milford Connecticut
Struck, I never looked at the date , I remember him selling his truck and just assumed he picked up another and started again (dumb ***) I believe he ended up with a JDM motor after this one had issues.
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #96  
Struck in AZ's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 6
From: Cave Creek, AZ
Originally Posted by todd abbott
Struck, I never looked at the date , I remember him selling his truck and just assumed he picked up another and started again (dumb ***) I believe he ended up with a JDM motor after this one had issues.
Not a problem man...and members actually 'donated to the cause' for a new JDM motor for him after this one let go.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 11:39 PM
  #97  
tallimeca's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,519
Likes: 0
From: Greater Boston
ring gap

i know this is old old news, but,

on a typical 5.4 engine as in the lightning, supercharged, stock bore, what ring gap is seen?

I built a 408 windsor motor for our mustang last year. Absolutely no engine building experience aside from small engine and power equipment. It was a good learning experience. There are many things that you can f-up if you don't check and recheck.

We spray the car with a 175 shot. Went round and round on what to set the gap at. A little different, because this car is a track only car, not a daily driver, and we went .030, top and bottom. No issues

Where you are combining supercharging and nos, i was just curious where they would be?
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2008 | 11:57 PM
  #98  
Tim Skelton's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 1
From: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
What about Total Seal gapless?
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:09 PM
  #99  
Incogneto's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Don't recall it but there's a rule of thumb value for ring gap, so much per size of bore. IIRC the top ring should be in the ~ .021-.023" range. If in doubt contact the rings' manufacturer.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #100  
LightningTuner's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,438
Likes: 1
From: Palm Coast, FL
Originally Posted by Tim Skelton
What about Total Seal gapless?
Gapless rings still have gaps. They just use two overlapping rings to give a virtual gapless seal. But there's still end gaps.
 
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 03:52 PM
  #101  
techfisher's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Incorrect Torque Specs for 06 F150 5.4

Originally Posted by superfords
apply a small bead of silicon rtv sealer to the gaps where the cylinder heads meet the block.

this is a 3 way intersection, the cylinder head, block and timing cover will all meet here, so a clean dry surface w/ some sealant applied is required to prevent oil leaks.

there are two of these joints on each side of the front of the motor.


now you are ready to install your timing cover.

(NOTE: you may want to install your front crank seal BEFORE installing the timing cover, it can be done with a simple seal/race installer or something similar. installing it afterwards requires a special tool)

you can now install the timing cover.




the bolts in the above picture are accurate for our trucks with the exception of number 10, we have a stud with a spacer behind it in that position. also the numbers in the above picture indicate the torque sequence. most people don't bother with it, but if you want it, there it is.

Tighten the engine front cover fasteners in sequence in three stages.
Stage 1: Tighten fasteners 1 through 5 to 25 Nm (18 lb-ft).
Stage 2: Tighten fasteners 6 and 7 to 48 Nm (35 lb-ft).
Stage 3: Tighten fasteners 8 through 15 to 48 Nm (35 lb-ft).

I'm not sure why they want 1-5 left at 18ft/lbs, doesn't make sense to me, so I went back and tightened them up to 35lb/ft as a final step. I don't know if that was right or wrong, but IMHO, it's not a critical thing anyway.
These are not the correct torque specs for every 5.4. I tried using these specs last night and ended up snapping off numbers 12 and 13. This required me to re-remove timing cover, clean off gasket sealer, and start over (after going to Ford for new bolts). While at Ford getting new bolts I asked the service dept for torque specs for my 2006 F150 5.4. The diagram he showed me had all the same numbers by the bolts but the instructions show:

Stage 1: Tighten fasteners 1 through 15 to 25 NM (18 lb-ft)
Stage 2: Tighten fasteners 6 and 7 to 48 NM (35 lb-ft)

4 Oil Pan Bolts:

Stage 1: Tighten to 20 NM (15 lb-ft)
Stage 2: Tighten an additional 60 degrees

Hope this helps save someone from a broken bolt headache!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 PM.