Lightning

2004 L comparison to......

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 01:43 PM
  #1  
frankmP's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: edmonton, alberta
2004 L comparison to......

what else the SRT10. Check out DC's spec and comparsion guide. Also a comparsion of the 10 to the Silverado SS.

http://www.srtforums.com/forums/show...251#post410251


..............................
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 01:54 PM
  #2  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
From that it says not really a truck:

Max towing
SRT - not recommended
Lightning - 5,000lbs
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 03:53 PM
  #3  
BlackLight's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 925
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver,BC,Canada
Talking Spin doctoring at it's finest

http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...a/fa3378c1.jpg

1) Sure it has more power, but it is quite a bit slower on the 0-60 mph...

2) Better (?!) transmission. Better for what ? Towing ? Traffic ? This not a truck anymore, it is a car with strange styling...

3) & 5) large is good yes, but not if you want to fit slicks for road or drag racing...

4) I'll give them that one. But we have auto headlights, man.

6) Moot point, it will never be good enough for some, and some only listen to the engine...

7) But I am sure MacDonald's is bad for you, and how's about the cargo area ?

8) Wish we had that.

9) My *** is pretty big and bold too, but not everyone likes it...
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 04:32 PM
  #4  
MISTERgadget's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 0
From: Miami / NYC
slower 0-60, barely beats it in the quarter, and 2 mph higher top speed.

Whoopdee-****ing-doo

First the silverado SS loser. now this.

They'll never beat the Lightning.
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 04:48 PM
  #5  
BDAZSVT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,018
Likes: 0
From: S. Indiana
I liked the way it put what it "won" in red but didn't if the others did!
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #6  
cpeapea's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: irving, texas
definitly the brakes are better, but for that much money you cant beat the L for value, practicality, and mod response.
 
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2003 | 07:21 PM
  #7  
InS0mNiAc's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: Chatsworth, California
13.9 in the 1/4? They get a factory b!tch or somethin? All that trash talkin and now nothing to back it up. I also read that its a "viper based v10" not "the viper v10," what happened there?
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Dec 25, 2003 | 07:30 PM
  #8  
bloomquist's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
From: NC
Originally posted by 01 XLT Sport
From that it says not really a truck:

Max towing
SRT - not recommended
Lightning - 5,000lbs
Mustang GT = 500 lbs more than the SRT10
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2003 | 10:42 AM
  #9  
RED 92's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
better link

http://www.srtforums.com/forums/show...?threadid=2425
 
Reply
Old Dec 26, 2003 | 12:52 PM
  #10  
Big Man's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Eddyville, Ky
Originally posted by RED 92
better link

http://www.srtforums.com/forums/show...?threadid=2425
I say we waste them all!!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 AM.