Lightning

New wallpaper!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 10:25 PM
  #31  
MISTERgadget's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 0
From: Miami / NYC
Great Pic BMWBig6, It's my new wallpaper, replacing, uh, well, another one of your wallpapers.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 10:29 PM
  #32  
BMWBig6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally posted by MISTERgadget
Great Pic BMWBig6, It's my new wallpaper, replacing, uh, well, another one of your wallpapers.
Thanks... what is the other one? I didn't know I had other wallpaper material online.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 10:51 PM
  #33  
MISTERgadget's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,660
Likes: 0
From: Miami / NYC
Yup this one right here,
http://www.gearfx.com/ford/c50%20002.jpg

You also had those pics of your girl and the L, great wallpaper too.

The sonic blue is really photogenic, awesome choice!
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 10:53 PM
  #34  
Harley#356's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 7,861
Likes: 0
From: Week-Philly, Weekend-Dirty Souf Jerz
yup, my new wallpaper

as always, amazing pics BMWBig6
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 10:55 PM
  #35  
grinomyte's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Thats funny because your old wallpaper is the source image for your new wallpaper.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 11:02 PM
  #36  
BMWBig6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally posted by grinomyte
Thats funny because your old wallpaper is the source image for your new wallpaper.
Close... they were taken on the same day, but it wasn't that particular photo..
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 11:11 PM
  #37  
grinomyte's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
are you sure? they match pretty much pixel for pixel far as i can tell. Unless you took two shots from the exact same position, within a second or so. I didnt overlay it cause i dont wanna resize. I mean even the clouds line up.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 11:14 PM
  #38  
BMWBig6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally posted by grinomyte
are you sure? they match pretty much pixel for pixel far as i can tell. Unless you took two shots from the exact same position, within a second or so. I didnt overlay it cause i dont wanna resize. I mean even the clouds line up.
Positive, they were taken within minutes of each other, but from slightly different angles.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 11:27 PM
  #39  
thepawn's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ, USA
The only thing I really caught first glance that I saw that made me know it was from a still was that while the rims are radially motion blurred, you didn't radially motion blur the SVT center caps as well. For the amount of blir in the spokes of the rim, we shouldn't be able to read SVT.

Dan
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 11:31 PM
  #40  
BMWBig6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally posted by thepawn
The only thing I really caught first glance that I saw that made me know it was from a still was that while the rims are radially motion blurred, you didn't radially motion blur the SVT center caps as well. For the amount of blir in the spokes of the rim, we shouldn't be able to read SVT.

Dan
LOL.... you guys are tough. You're right, but like a record on a turntable, the outside edge of the LP is moving faster than the inside or center... so the SVT barely moves while the spokes are flying around right? OK it's not perfect by any means... just having fun! I know somebody is itching to tell me the antenna should be leaning over more too...
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 11:35 PM
  #41  
grinomyte's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Ok this is driving me nuts, i cant find a single visual difference between the two pics except for the cover, which could easily have been cut off in the texture application for the back. Big6, could you please show me something that confirms its a different pic. i know, i know, im insane.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 11:37 PM
  #42  
BMWBig6's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Just look at the angle, the motion image is taken from a lower perspective (like from kneeling position). Hint: shadow location on ground.
 
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2003 | 11:40 PM
  #43  
grinomyte's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
yeah i just saw it, your a degree or so to the left and a notch down. And the angles are hard because the whole image has been reangled, but a small part of the reflection extends into the panel in front of the door on the driver side, thats the only difference with a good enough point of reference for me to notice the difference.
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2003 | 09:31 AM
  #44  
thepawn's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,297
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ, USA
Originally posted by BMWBig6
LOL.... you guys are tough. You're right, but like a record on a turntable, the outside edge of the LP is moving faster than the inside or center... so the SVT barely moves while the spokes are flying around right? OK it's not perfect by any means... just having fun! I know somebody is itching to tell me the antenna should be leaning over more too...
Your antenna should be leaning more too. :P

Hehe...do you do all your stuff in photoshop or something else? It is good work, you match shadows and lighting textures really well.

Dan
 
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2003 | 09:48 AM
  #45  
builtfordfast's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
From: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
As always, a great pic BMWBig6. Your photoshop skills are absolutely A1.
BTW, whats with the antenna ? Hehe.




Have a good day eh ! ____________ Dave.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:14 PM.