Lightning

New Dyno numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 02:00 AM
  #1  
CHIKIN1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Arrow New Dyno numbers

I just got back from FFW in Commerce...It was a blast to get to see all my friends that live far away!!!! I don't have a scanner so you'll just have to believe me...I have several board members that can vouch for the numbers if need be as well as Jim@JDM!!!


On the race program no N20:
428hp
582ft/lbs
A/F ratio was about 12.0 all the way across

On the street prrogam w/N20:
482hp
622ft/lbs
A/F ratio was about 11.7 all the way across

Jim said that the numbers would have been higher if I had a program to keep the truck from kicking down into 2nd (i.e. if we could have dynoed from a lower RPM )!!!

Can't wait to see everyone @ WFC!!!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 04:26 AM
  #2  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Are you sure your non N20 #'s are correct on the tq? 582 no juice and only 428 hp?
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 08:25 AM
  #3  
CHIKIN1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Flying ****
Are you sure your non N20 #'s are correct on the tq? 582 no juice and only 428 hp?
I don't know much about dynoing, but thats what it says!!!
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 09:01 AM
  #4  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
List your mods. That doesnt make since you only got 40+ lbs of torque on the juice, yet your hp shot up...

482 tq sounds more realistic without the juice.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 09:13 AM
  #5  
69Roadster's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Madison, AL
Good numbers CHIKIN1. Congrats! How much nitrous are you spraying in the second run? Did you dyno spraying w/ your race N20 program to verify it was less power than the street program?
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 09:45 AM
  #6  
rscoleman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
From: Fl/Tenn
From the #'s it looks like a 50 shot .
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2003 | 10:14 AM
  #7  
easterisland's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Good job Chikn. Your dyno #'s are lower than mine and your truck is quicker...On the same dyno, operated by the same people...Go figure. Nice to meet you by the way.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Apr 14, 2003 | 02:15 PM
  #8  
HANKFAN's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Nice numbers CHIKIN1. Have you had any problems running the juice on your street program? I have run my 75hp shot on my JDM street program and everything is fine.

69Roadster- I think CHIKIN1 is running a 75hp shot with a 5# lower!
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 12:15 AM
  #9  
CHIKIN1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Flying ****
482 tq sounds more realistic without the juice.
Actually, I've made 510ft./lbs. b-4 on a different dyno with less mods...Jim@JDM seems to think that the numbers were correct!!!??? Its not like its an uncommon thing for these engines to produce over 100 more ft./lbs torque than HP!!!

Mods:
JL 3# Lower
Sean Hyland (true) 2# upper
JDM Filter kit
Accufab T/B
JDM long tubes w/high flow converters and dual mufflers
JDM Electric Fan
TR-6 plugs
PSP chip
PSP nitrous plate
NX Ford kit/ jetted for 75 HP
PI 2600 stall
Factory Tech Monster Box
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 03:50 AM
  #10  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Umm, without the juice, youre trying to tell me you pulled 582 lbs of tq with 428 hp? Then with the juice, you only pulled 622lb of tq? I dont think so. 482 - 510 sounds more like it without the juice.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 09:06 AM
  #11  
badasstruck1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Well **** I will have to disagree with you I have had mine on the dyno several times and my last sesion was 411 rwhp and 538 rwtq so I guess it is possible.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 09:55 AM
  #12  
CHIKIN1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Flying ****
Umm, without the juice, youre trying to tell me you pulled 582 lbs of tq with 428 hp? Then with the juice, you only pulled 622lb of tq? I dont think so. 482 - 510 sounds more like it without the juice.

UMM, WTF would I lie about that for???
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 10:03 AM
  #13  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Look, all i did was bring this to your attention. What mods do you have to lay down 582 lbs of tq with no nitrous if you arent running an after market blower?

Then you spray and only pull 622 but your hp shoots up 54 hp but only pick up 40 lbs or tq on juice? Something isnt right.

No way a 6# pulley, long tubes, exhaust, t-body, cobra h20 pump, and e-fan are going to give you damn near 600 lbs of tq even with a race program.

I think you need to re-dyno.
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 10:21 AM
  #14  
CHIKIN1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Flying ****
No way a 6# pulley, long tubes, exhaust, t-body, cobra h20 pump, and e-fan are going to give you damn near 600 lbs of tq even with a race program.

I think you need to re-dyno.
I think I remember a 2002 making 450hp/over600ft/lbs with similar mods....Why would someone who tunes these trucks everyday say that my numbers look good to him???

I'm gonna have it re-dynoed soon, but until then I'll see if I can get my dyno sheet posted. It may have been a converter flash or something, but 400rpms later was still making about 550ft./lbs!!!
1000rpms later it was still over 450ft.lbs!!!
Thats what the dyno said so what else am I suppose to post, should I go back to speculation???
 
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 10:24 AM
  #15  
easterisland's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Get a works blower and get back to us with some real #'s... And if you are not from CA your dyno #'s don't mean ****!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 PM.