Leonard

What pulley combo are you running, and are you still running stock injectors??

I am running a 8# lower and 3.5" upper right now, and mine is a pritty sick beast. I plan to go with a 4 or 6# lower and a 2.75 or 3" to get mine to run about 16-17 psi on a street tune and about 20psi when I am at the track

I am going to Jimbos shop wednesday to get some more tunning done, so after that he may be able to help you with your tunning. I am also going to go to 50# injectors so when I am racing I will have plenty of fuel.

 

That was with a 2lb lower and 2.5" upper. 55lb siemans deka injectors and twin 255lph fuel pumps, all other fuel components are stock except for the additions to the port on the fuel rail which is just to supply fuel to my nitrous fogger and get fuel pressure readings to my autometer gauge.

 

Jesus, the next thing hes gonna ask you to do is pull the engine and do a dyno at the crank. Whats up your *** fastbolt? Your comment was useless.

 

I didn't ask anyone to do anything. what leanord should be doing tho is using a Dynojet if he wants to brag about #s or at least saying that these are mustang #s up front.

 

Can you tell me how many BTU's/second and N*m that thing's putting out???

It's a joke...and for the record it's 401.388 BTU/second and 867.5892 N*m for all of the conversion challenged.

 

Wow, we are all real impressed.

 

 

Amazing how much power a stock bottom end can take

 

Thanks Bud

Looks like we are thinking alike

while our setups aren't exactly alike they are pritty close
I have a built motor
KB
twin 185 fuel pumps
will have 50# injectors
and prob 4# lower with a 2.75 upper

Maybee someday we will get both trucks lined up next to each other and show everyone what a pair of lightnings can do.

 

 

assbolt2002,

As are we with your intimate knowledge of the intracacies of dyno software...

What I will say about your oh so enlightening and eloquently worded comments is that you are a master of stating the obvious all while backpeddling at the same time.

For the record, my dyno numbers mean nothing compared to someone else's dyno numbers put down on a different dyno, on a different day with different weather conditions. Granted, the software attempts to take all of these items into account but it's still got a margin of error. In fact, while doing another 10 pulls last Thursday the Dynojet software was crazy enough to warn me that the weather conditions from my previous runs were significantly different (on the order of 20+ degrees), so even a comparison on the same dyno should be taken with a grain of salt.

And another gem from the braintrust...

Regardless of what dyno those numbers were put down on, they are still impressive. And what you should do, AssClown, is keep your inane comments to yourself, which currently only serve to confirm the fact that you are a jag-off.

 

Damn, there is a difference in the graphs between a Dyno Jet and a mustang Dyno? I think I was pretty "upfront." I posted a picture two hours after the original post and well before you even posted.
If you look at my photo gallery I have even more.

 

[QUOTE99svt i am not attacking your precious JL or KB i am just stating the facts about mustangs and dynojets. leonard i'm sure you truck makes plenty of power but not those same numbers on a dynojet is all. [/QUOTE]

This has nothing to do with KB or JL, it's about you. Instead of making remarks, pis$ing and moaning, and whining about everyone elses business, break out your 2002 fastbolt. What kind of helpful information or numbers can you produce? If you can't, what's your deal? We defend our trucks on here, why can't we defend the products we like? .....unless you can prove otherwise.

 

Rusty has a 1999 with stock bottom end. He ran an 11.59 to I think Sals 11.57 on Friday night.
I think he said something around 18/19psi.

 

I finally got it scanned.


I have an FJO wideband O2 sensor, so I didn't pay the $50 extra to get a graph. This graph below is what I got from the dyno less than 24 hours after those original pulls.