Lightning

Installed my heat exchanger last night(pics).

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 01:14 AM
  #31  
Shazbot's Avatar
Registered User
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Originally posted by grinomyte
BTW, no offense, and none taken.
Hey, it ain't no thang!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 03:00 AM
  #32  
svtmike24's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
From: goldsboro, NC
looks tough but i think the grill needs to go back on!
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 03:41 AM
  #33  
UNVMY03's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: North Texas
I need to get one those! It would make a difference here in Texas. Without the grill it looks a little ricey. I like the photo shop idea with grill inserts.
Hey Latemodle, can you photoshop some screen mesh inserts like NASCAR?
 
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 11:19 AM
  #34  
Tim Skelton's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,928
Likes: 1
From: The People's Republic of Los Angeles
Re: Curious about something.

Originally posted by Shazbot
So, if the unit is larger...is it also heavier? It stands to reason that it's weight would be greater, if it holds more fluid. In that case, what are you gaining? Larger radiators, transmission coolers, and oil coolers have obvious advantages to engine health. What is the advantage of a larger heat exchanger if any added boost associated with a cooler charge is negated by higher weight?

This is in no way meant as a flame. I like it and would like to know more about its functional benefits.
I put the exchanger in the same category as an oil cooler or transmission cooler, i.e., not a performance part, but a reliability part. I don't care if it improves the performance at all so long as the margin of error for detonation (such as with sustained high-speed operation) is increased.

The problem with air-to-water intercoolers is that the water temp begins to rise with sustained high-boost operation, whereas an air-to-air is always exposed to an infinite supply of ambient air. Even though there is less boost loss through an A-2-W due to the smaller core (water conducts better than air), the water temps can begin to creep up over time. Which is why A-2-W is better suited to drag runs, whereas A-2-A is better for road racing. But JDM has documented lower temps even on a single drag run with the Fluidyne exchanger.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 PM.