Lightning

02 Lightning #'s are in!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 03:58 PM
  #1  
icehoc8's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Thumbs up 02 Lightning #'s are in!!

Here is the peak numbers for my 02 Lightning w/the mods being K&N air filter and boost bypass:

1st Run: It Got ****ed up because the truck shifted out of gear.

2nd Run: Peak HP 378@5393rpm and Peak TQ 456.76@4148rpm.

3rd Run: Peak HP 370@4978rpm and Peak TQ 454.09@3837rpm.

I am very impressed at my trucks performance.
Rock On

-Ryan
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 04:10 PM
  #2  
icehoc8's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Here is the link to the Graphs and Numbers:

Clicky Clicky Clicky
 

Last edited by icehoc8; Feb 9, 2003 at 04:37 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 04:39 PM
  #3  
cyntaxx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 1
From: here
WOW that first run is AWESOME!! nice strong #s for just those two mods. i know guys with chips and more mods pulling those #s. def. a factory freak!
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 05:22 PM
  #4  
Nasty Wendy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Waggaman Louisiana
Thumbs up

Wow. Is that rear wheel Hp/Tq ? If so how much would that be at the crank?
Awesome.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 07:35 PM
  #5  
speeder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: EL Sobrante, CA ,
Question Dyno

I normally mind my own business but I can`t this time, there is no way your truck made 378 rwhp and 456 rwtq with just a filter and boost bypass. I dyno`d my truck last weekend and made 386 rwhp and 481 rwtq, this was with my chip set on my winter program, I would have topped 400 rwhp with my chip on the warm weather program but it was to cold to use it.
Mods listed below.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 09:09 PM
  #6  
Zman's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Hey Speeder, don't be so sure about that. I've seen "STOCK" L's here being dynoed at ove 370 to the wheels corrected.

So it can happen.
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 09:13 PM
  #7  
Nasty Wendy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Waggaman Louisiana
Talking Re: Dyno

Originally posted by speeder
I normally mind my own business but I can`t this time, there is no way your truck made 378 rwhp and 456 rwtq with just a filter and boost bypass. I dyno`d my truck last weekend and made 386 rwhp and 481 rwtq, this was with my chip set on my winter program, I would have topped 400 rwhp with my chip on the warm weather program but it was to cold to use it.
Mods listed below.
Maybe its a BLACK Lightning. That would explain alot otherwise I call bullshidt too.
LOL
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 9, 2003 | 09:30 PM
  #8  
Flying Mofo's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
From: Huntington Beach/CA
Sure those are SAE corrected #'s? If so, thats one freak Lightning
 
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #9  
speeder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
From: EL Sobrante, CA ,
Zman

No, I still don`t by it, maybe if those are uncorrected numbers, then sure its possible, the number I posted above, 386 rwhp and 481 rwtq are corrected numbers, the uncorrected numbers for my dyno run are 401 rwhp and 500 rwtq, to much of a difference for the numbers to be right.

Larry.
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 01:37 AM
  #10  
icehoc8's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Hello and thanks for the comments.

With regards to those that asked if the #'s are SAE corrected, i am not sure. I will call the shop tomorrow and ask.

And to those asking about the mods, the only mods are what I stated earlier. I have a list of mods waiting to be put on but only the filter and bypass.

-Ryan
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 01:41 AM
  #11  
SVT F15O's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,472
Likes: 0
From: Shelton, Connecticut
Originally posted by icehoc8
Hello and thanks for the comments.

With regards to those that asked if the #'s are SAE corrected, i am not sure. I will call the shop tomorrow and ask.
-Ryan
Judging by that statement I think those are uncorrected numbers. But who knows. -Mat-
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 02:21 AM
  #12  
cyntaxx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 1
From: here
you're running a bit rich to boot....

kinda hard to believe now. with a better AF mixture you'd be around 385-390....and i just can't see that from a K&N and boost bypass...
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 08:13 AM
  #13  
02Thunder's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
Gentlemen, those numbers are also from that new dyno company out of Australia. They are not the same as a Dynojet or a Mustang Dyno. The numbers are going to be skewed a little from that of the normal dyno's.

It might have made 378/456 on that particular type of dyno, uncorrected. But I cannot see those numbers from a Dynojet or Mustang Dyno. Sorry!

joe
 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 03:45 PM
  #14  
icehoc8's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Hey guys, I got a email back from the guy you coordinated and did the dyno day and here is the email I received.

Hi Ryan. We are 95% sure the dyno results are SAE corrected. We are looking
into that now. Your dyno results are up now. Just search for a 2002
Lightning on the search page of dynoperformance.com.

Cheers,
Dean
When he gets back to me about the numbers, I will let you guys know.

Thanks, Ryan

 
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2003 | 03:48 PM
  #15  
icehoc8's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
And another thing, here is my truck on the dynoperformance website for anyone who cares about the details

Click

Thanks Again

 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.