What do y'all think about these numbers?
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1
From: Central Joisey
What do y'all think about these numbers?
Last week I posted bad pics of dyno graphs. Here are the actual numbers. What do you think about the numbers and A/F? These numbers are with an addition of a 1# upper pulley (With the 4# lower).
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1
From: Central Joisey
Originally posted by SCOTTSBEATER
Are the ET's in your sig run with these same mods?
Looking good. I wish I could generate that sort of horsepower at this altitude
Are the ET's in your sig run with these same mods?
Looking good. I wish I could generate that sort of horsepower at this altitude
We are pretty much at sea level here and it was a cold day.
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: passing an F body on I-25
I haven't had mine on the dyno yet and would be ashamed to post the results if I did. 5,000 ft can have a humbling effect on your #'s
Looks like if you were to bolt on some slicks you might dip into the 11's if the conditions were right. If not, atleast the 12.00's
Looks like if you were to bolt on some slicks you might dip into the 11's if the conditions were right. If not, atleast the 12.00's
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1
From: Central Joisey
Originally posted by SCOTTSBEATER
Looks like if you were to bolt on some slicks you might dip into the 11's if the conditions were right. If not, atleast the 12.00's
Looks like if you were to bolt on some slicks you might dip into the 11's if the conditions were right. If not, atleast the 12.00's
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,939
Likes: 0
From: Warner Robins, Ga, CSA
I noticed those are 'Standard Correction' numbers. Did they provide you with 'SAE Corrected' numbers? The SAE numbers are what allow all of us to compare numbers across the country. The Standard's don't allow for the differences in weather, location, etc.
Never-the-less, those are great numbers!
Dan
Never-the-less, those are great numbers!
Dan
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1
From: Central Joisey
I didn't get the SAE numbers. The Standard correction does correct for altitude and temperature, it just uses a different basis than the SAE does.
Correcting to SAE J1349 alters the data to make it seem as if it was taken when the atmospheric pressure was 29.23 in/hg., the temperature 77°F and the humidity zero.
"Standard corrected," uses 29.92 in/hg and 68°F'. This is all according to Dynojet's website.
As long as the same correction factor is used in another part of the country (SAE or Standard), you should be able to compare "like" numbers.
Thanks. I'm happy with them.
Correcting to SAE J1349 alters the data to make it seem as if it was taken when the atmospheric pressure was 29.23 in/hg., the temperature 77°F and the humidity zero.
"Standard corrected," uses 29.92 in/hg and 68°F'. This is all according to Dynojet's website.
As long as the same correction factor is used in another part of the country (SAE or Standard), you should be able to compare "like" numbers.
Thanks. I'm happy with them.
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 1
From: Central Joisey
Originally posted by captainoblivious
yysenhimer - what kind of A/F meter did they use?
yysenhimer - what kind of A/F meter did they use?
