F150online Forums

F150online Forums (https://www.f150online.com/forums/)
-   Lightning (https://www.f150online.com/forums/lightning-50/)
-   -   What do y'all think about these numbers? (https://www.f150online.com/forums/lightning/104405-what-do-yall-think-about-these-numbers.html)

yysenhimer Jan 23, 2003 11:15 AM

What do y'all think about these numbers?
 
Last week I posted bad pics of dyno graphs. Here are the actual numbers. What do you think about the numbers and A/F? These numbers are with an addition of a 1# upper pulley (With the 4# lower).

https://www.f150online.com/galleries...2641-48175.jpg

ICULOKN Jan 23, 2003 11:17 AM

Oh yeah baby!!! Those ROCK!! :rocker:

yysenhimer Jan 23, 2003 11:18 AM

OOPS. THe A/F numbers only printed on the corrected graph.

https://www.f150online.com/galleries...2641-48176.jpg

SCOTTSBEATER Jan 23, 2003 11:22 AM

Are the ET's in your sig run with these same mods?

Looking good. I wish I could generate that sort of horsepower at this altitude:(

yysenhimer Jan 23, 2003 11:26 AM


Originally posted by SCOTTSBEATER
Are the ET's in your sig run with these same mods?

Looking good. I wish I could generate that sort of horsepower at this altitude:(

The ET's are with all of the same mods except the 1# upper pulley.
We are pretty much at sea level here and it was a cold day.

SCOTTSBEATER Jan 23, 2003 11:37 AM

I haven't had mine on the dyno yet and would be ashamed to post the results if I did. 5,000 ft can have a humbling effect on your #'s:(

Looks like if you were to bolt on some slicks you might dip into the 11's if the conditions were right. If not, atleast the 12.00's:D

yysenhimer Jan 23, 2003 12:09 PM


Originally posted by SCOTTSBEATER
Looks like if you were to bolt on some slicks you might dip into the 11's if the conditions were right. If not, atleast the 12.00's:D
If I ever get my exhaust and I bolt on a set of tires, that's what I am hoping for. I just may be ordering rods soon.

unclemole Jan 23, 2003 12:22 PM

Sweet!

LIGHTNINROD Jan 23, 2003 12:25 PM

I noticed those are 'Standard Correction' numbers. Did they provide you with 'SAE Corrected' numbers? The SAE numbers are what allow all of us to compare numbers across the country. The Standard's don't allow for the differences in weather, location, etc.

Never-the-less, those are great numbers!

Dan

yysenhimer Jan 23, 2003 01:00 PM

I didn't get the SAE numbers. The Standard correction does correct for altitude and temperature, it just uses a different basis than the SAE does.

Correcting to SAE J1349 alters the data to make it seem as if it was taken when the atmospheric pressure was 29.23 in/hg., the temperature 77°F and the humidity zero.

"Standard corrected," uses 29.92 in/hg and 68°F'. This is all according to Dynojet's website.

As long as the same correction factor is used in another part of the country (SAE or Standard), you should be able to compare "like" numbers.

Thanks. I'm happy with them.

captainoblivious Jan 23, 2003 03:57 PM

yysenhimer - what kind of A/F meter did they use?

yysenhimer Jan 23, 2003 04:25 PM


Originally posted by captainoblivious
yysenhimer - what kind of A/F meter did they use?
Wideband from the tail pipe. BM doesn't have the capability for the other way. I know it is not as accurate, but I really wanted to get it done ASAP and it was the only way at the time.

cyntaxx Jan 23, 2003 05:20 PM

wow those are some great #s!:rocker: looks like a strong runner!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands