stock head with amp?
#1
#2
#3
There is no reason not to go behind the headunit to get your signal in an F150. It takes 5 minutes TOPS to pull the radio out. Also, if you use a line out converter to convert speaker level to RCA, and install this behind the radio, there is no extra work to do if you ever decided to go to an aftermarket headunit.
#4
#5
#6
I agree. That was not in question. If you do not need an LOC though why install one? He is only adding a sub and amp. Everything else he is leaving stock for now. There is no downside to using the LOC already built into the amp in this case.
An LOC behind the HU would be useful for future expansion but I gave him a cheaper option.
An LOC behind the HU would be useful for future expansion but I gave him a cheaper option.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
I would do whatever needed to allow best upgradability in the future. Your amp doesn't need an REM+ to operate, but I would install that wire anyway in case you decide to go with a different amp in the future. That wire would run the same direction as a pair of RCAs coming out of the back of the headunit which would be great to have if you ever decide to go with an aftermarket headunit in the future. Using RCAs behind the headunit would require a low power converter to be spliced into the speaker wires behind the headunit. You'd also have to research which wires are your REM+ and front speaker wires. The benifits of having an aftermarket headunit is not only the ability to customize your audio to your preferences better than the stock one, but you can have the option of Ipod connectivity, navigation, DVD playback, multiple audio and video inputs, full range speaker output, video output, options on aftermarket headunits are numerous.
But yeah I'd get the work out of the way and go behind the headunit. It's not even complicated in my honest opinion.
But yeah I'd get the work out of the way and go behind the headunit. It's not even complicated in my honest opinion.