Ford tremor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 1, 2013 | 02:34 PM
  #16  
BROTHERDAVE's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 4
From: Friendswood Texas
if you had a comparibly equipped supercrew with 3.55 gears, I was under the impression that a eco>6.2>5.0 in acceleration?

i was also under the impression that getting a supercrew ecoboost into the 13's was not that difficult. if I heard several lightning guys talk about that when their truck were running mid 12's, they were the most fun, dailey drivers and reliable. from what i have seen, this truck should be able to accomplish the same thing.

sorry that there are 4 threads on this truck but this site is so dead, what is the harm? looks like less than 3 people posted over the weekend in this section, there was a time that the first page was all from the current day.

i remember when the buick grand national rolled out with a single turbo v-6, all the old school guys hated....until they got smoked.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2013 | 06:23 PM
  #17  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,530
Likes: 817
From: Joplin MO
Dave, the haters just don't like the sound of anything except a V-8 exhaust.
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2013 | 06:55 PM
  #18  
88racing's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,697
Likes: 14
From: In the fast lane from LA to Tokyo...
Originally Posted by Stealth
Works for me.

All yous "there's no replacement for displacement" mugs can keep dreaming. Live in the now. This is it.
I am living in the now....if the shelby mustang can have the 5.8 then there's no reason why the truck can't either.... http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...s-at-609-rwhp/
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2013 | 07:21 PM
  #19  
TruckGuy24's Avatar
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,730
Likes: 42
From: Concord, NC
Originally Posted by 88racing

I am living in the now....if the shelby mustang can have the 5.8 then there's no reason why the truck can't either.... http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...s-at-609-rwhp/
Imagine the power... The truck would need factory traction bars to even launch lmao
 
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2013 | 07:48 AM
  #20  
NASSTY's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 2
From: ME
Originally Posted by 88racing
I am living in the now....if the shelby mustang can have the 5.8 then there's no reason why the truck can't either.... http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...s-at-609-rwhp/
They could put that engine in the truck but the $65k-$70k price tag of the Shelby would also go along with it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2013 | 10:10 AM
  #21  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by 88racing
I am living in the now....if the shelby mustang can have the 5.8 then there's no reason why the truck can't either.... http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/0...s-at-609-rwhp/
Look beyond your nose and understand why Ford is building this truck. You want a 5.8 in an F150, do it. Want a blower, put one on it. How does your wallet look?

Like said in another thread about this truck, this truck is built with existing shelf parts and keeps with existing CAFE standards. It's cost effective, is a no brainer and makes complete sense, not to mention the engine is the best current all around performer in the F150 trucks, period.

Read the specs and bow down to me.

http://www.ford.com/trucks/f150/specifications/engine/
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2013 | 01:16 PM
  #22  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
Originally Posted by NASSTY
They could put that engine in the truck but the $65k-$70k price tag of the Shelby would also go along with it.
$30k just for the engine... I've checked.



Would love to drop one in my Lightning.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2013 | 01:21 PM
  #23  
Odin's Wrath's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,121
Likes: 0
From: Hammer Lane
In fairness, if you bought a Lightning and kept it stock, this truck probably won't be much different performance-wise. Maybe a little suspension work if you're planning on hitting some road courses... And the sound it makes. Wouldn't be a bad daily driver.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2013 | 10:23 PM
  #24  
Tbird69's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Some more pics and info.

http://www.netcarshow.com/ford/2014-f-150_tremor/
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 AM.