Built Ford Fast?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 04:07 PM
  #1  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Built Ford Fast?

http://autos.yahoo.com/news/built-fo...s-182-mph.html


182 mph — that’s how fast Hajek Motorsports and Ford Engineers got their 2011 Ford F-250 Super Duty to go. On its way to 182 mph, the 6.7-liter turbodiesel V-8-equipped F-250 set not one, not two, but three production truck land speed records at the Bonneville Salt Flats.

The three speed records that this lightly-modified F-250 broke were in the B Production Diesel Truck class, at the Bonneville Salt Flats. The truck broke the biodiesel record, using soy-based fuel by hitting 130.614 mph. The F-250’s second fastest record of the day was using regular diesel fuel, where it managed to hit 171.123 mph. The third and final record of the day was using B20 biodiesel, where the F-250 topped out at 182 mph. For comparison’s sake, the old record was set by a Duramax-equipped GMC Sierra HD, which only managed 166.850 mph.



The most remarkable thing about the F-250’s speed is that it the truck remains mostly stock. Ford says that its engineers and Oklahoma-based Hajek Motorsports only installed a high pressure fuel pump, new fuel injectors, new turbos, and modified the compression ratio. Aside from the performance modifications, the F-250 was also fitted with a roll cage, five-point harness, a drag chute, aerodynamic fairings for the front bumper, and the obligatory salt flat moon-dish wheels. The F-250’s drivetrain and transmission were stock.
 

Last edited by KingRanchCoy; Aug 25, 2011 at 04:26 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 04:17 PM
  #2  
azmidget91's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,719
Likes: 0
From: Maricopa, AZ
I dont agree with the "mildly modified" statement but pretty cool
completely upgraded fuel system new turbos, and different pistons

id say it was more than just mildly modified, they probably put about $10k into engine performance alone
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 04:19 PM
  #3  
MTM Ford's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 1
From: Butler, Pennsylvania
Originally Posted by KingRanchCoy
I bet it's because of the wheels
 

Last edited by MTM Ford; Aug 25, 2011 at 04:23 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 04:21 PM
  #4  
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 6
From: San Angelo, TX
Originally Posted by azmidget91
I dont agree with the "mildly modified" statement but pretty cool
completely upgraded fuel system new turbos, and different pistons

id say it was more than just mildly modified, they probably put about $10k into engine performance alone
I think 10k would be worth it
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 04:24 PM
  #5  
88racing's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,697
Likes: 14
From: In the fast lane from LA to Tokyo...
Nice....

Good job Ford....
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 04:25 PM
  #6  
dirtyd88's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 2
From: Burleson, TX
freakin' link won't open on my work computer....

I can never view anything Ford related in the news....wonder if that's because I work for the Government? (GM....)
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 06:08 PM
  #7  
dirtyd88's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,190
Likes: 2
From: Burleson, TX
Well, I guess you could consider them bolt ons. Wish they listed the specs of the new fuel system, fuel pump, size of the turbo, and the comp ratio.*

Still, getting a 7000+ lb truck to move that fast is crazy!!
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Aug 25, 2011 | 06:14 PM
  #8  
harleydude78's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
Sweet. Great work Ford!
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 06:59 PM
  #9  
JForestZ34's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dirtyd88
Well, I guess you could consider them bolt ons. Wish they listed the specs of the new fuel system, fuel pump, size of the turbo, and the comp ratio.*

Still, getting a 7000+ lb truck to move that fast is crazy!!

HAHA bumping the compression ratio is not a simple bolt on. LOL


But awesome truck thou


James
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 07:00 PM
  #10  
JForestZ34's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by KingRanchCoy
http://autos.yahoo.com/news/built-fo...s-182-mph.html


182 mph — that’s how fast Hajek Motorsports and Ford Engineers got their 2011 Ford F-250 Super Duty to go. On its way to 182 mph, the 6.7-liter turbodiesel V-8-equipped F-250 set not one, not two, but three production truck land speed records at the Bonneville Salt Flats.

The three speed records that this lightly-modified F-250 broke were in the B Production Diesel Truck class, at the Bonneville Salt Flats. The truck broke the biodiesel record, using soy-based fuel by hitting 130.614 mph. The F-250’s second fastest record of the day was using regular diesel fuel, where it managed to hit 171.123 mph. The third and final record of the day was using B20 biodiesel, where the F-250 topped out at 182 mph. For comparison’s sake, the old record was set by a Duramax-equipped GMC Sierra HD, which only managed 166.850 mph.



The most remarkable thing about the F-250’s speed is that it the truck remains mostly stock. Ford says that its engineers and Oklahoma-based Hajek Motorsports only installed a high pressure fuel pump, new fuel injectors, new turbos, and modified the compression ratio. Aside from the performance modifications, the F-250 was also fitted with a roll cage, five-point harness, a drag chute, aerodynamic fairings for the front bumper, and the obligatory salt flat moon-dish wheels. The F-250’s drivetrain and transmission were stock.

Oh and you forgot to say it was lowered 8 inches.. LOL


James
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 09:12 PM
  #11  
avfrog's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,172
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Awesome!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2011 | 09:28 PM
  #12  
coobies5's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 2
From: Houston
milling the heads is another way to get higher compression....
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2011 | 01:53 AM
  #13  
azmidget91's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,719
Likes: 0
From: Maricopa, AZ
Originally Posted by coobies5
milling the heads is another way to get higher compression....
either way not a bolt on, id imagine they just threw different pistons in though
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2011 | 10:44 AM
  #14  
coobies5's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 2
From: Houston
i guess, alot of the chevy drivers down here have milled heads and its pretty much a "bolt-on" for them
 
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2011 | 12:08 PM
  #15  
azmidget91's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,719
Likes: 0
From: Maricopa, AZ
if there is machine work needed, it is not a bolt on, i understand that you just unbolt the head and bolt it back on but the meaning of a "bolt on" is that its very minimal work just bolt it on and go type of thing. milling the head is engine work
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 PM.