Interesting Obama Interview in Texas
It is just somthing I disagree with not a big deal. Tell me which republican will do a better job then Obama? I want Gary Johnson, and he is the only one with a great record who could "derail Obama". Look him up I guarantee you will all like his economic policies. He is also for the government getting out of are life so if you are for that then you would probably like him. I am going to be 18 in 2012 and I am going to be voting for obama unless Johnson the republican nominee.
I am not harsh with any of you but what you said just paints me as an idiot just because I think hes doing the best he can
I am not harsh with any of you but what you said just paints me as an idiot just because I think hes doing the best he can

try being president in the middle of a huge recession
If you'll recall, the economy took it's big dive less than one month before election day in 2008. The polls had Obama winning against McCain, and the run on the market was in response to the uncertainty that implied for economic stability. The people with money in this country are waiting this administration out.
its still not cool to ask why people dont like you, texas is a red state, they dont love him. and this birther stuff is pointless too

Pointless? Is this based on your 'opinion', or do you have some facts you'd like to share as to why Obama has no birth certificate with a Dr.'s name and/or the name of the hospital he was born in? I'm really getting sick of statements from people like you who have no facts, just ludicrous assumptions from being an Obamabot.
That is akin to walking and never looking up. Just keep your eyes planted in front of you and not ask questions.
That is akin to walking and never looking up. Just keep your eyes planted in front of you and not ask questions.

You are so laughable....you've got to be paid by some organization in support of Obama and Democrats.
Last edited by screwyou; Apr 21, 2011 at 10:12 PM.
It is just somthing I disagree with not a big deal. Tell me which republican will do a better job then Obama? I want Gary Johnson, and he is the only one with a great record who could "derail Obama". Look him up I guarantee you will all like his economic policies. He is also for the government getting out of are life so if you are for that then you would probably like him. I am going to be 18 in 2012 and I am going to be voting for obama unless Johnson the republican nominee.
I am not harsh with any of you but what you said just paints me as an idiot just because I think hes doing the best he can
I am not harsh with any of you but what you said just paints me as an idiot just because I think hes doing the best he can

Like Ronnie did ? Think he did a great job of combating the mess Carter left the country in. GH Bush carried on the continued recovery after 2 terms of Ronnie.
Prime at 19.x %, a great home mortgage was 25%, and my 1st new truck, a 1990, I got the deal of the decade ( DEC 1989 ) at 9.75 % APR. That was unheard of in the 80s.
Thanks Jimmy
Prime at 19.x %, a great home mortgage was 25%, and my 1st new truck, a 1990, I got the deal of the decade ( DEC 1989 ) at 9.75 % APR. That was unheard of in the 80s.
Thanks Jimmy
I hear you loud and clear young brother. I don't doubt for a second that the certificate of live birth is authentic. It is not his birth certificate.
If I were to see a whole bunch of people who were born in HI the year Obama was born there coming forward to tell the country that they too only have a certificate of live birth, I would be less inclined to believe that Obama could actually produce a long form birth certificate. That is not the case, infact it's the opposite.
You may have been too young to remember, but during the W Bush years the media rode bush like a pack mule about every damn thing he might or might not have done. Some of us would just like the media to give Obama the same thorough scrutiny. Is that really asking for too much?
If I were to see a whole bunch of people who were born in HI the year Obama was born there coming forward to tell the country that they too only have a certificate of live birth, I would be less inclined to believe that Obama could actually produce a long form birth certificate. That is not the case, infact it's the opposite.
You may have been too young to remember, but during the W Bush years the media rode bush like a pack mule about every damn thing he might or might not have done. Some of us would just like the media to give Obama the same thorough scrutiny. Is that really asking for too much?
I hear you loud and clear young brother. I don't doubt for a second that the certificate of live birth is authentic. It is not his birth certificate.
If I were to see a whole bunch of people who were born in HI the year Obama was born there coming forward to tell the country that they too only have a certificate of live birth, I would be less inclined to believe that Obama could actually produce a long form birth certificate. That is not the case, infact it's the opposite.
You may have been too young to remember, but during the W Bush years the media rode bush like a pack mule about every damn thing he might or might not have done. Some of us would just like the media to give Obama the same thorough scrutiny. Is that really asking for too much?
If I were to see a whole bunch of people who were born in HI the year Obama was born there coming forward to tell the country that they too only have a certificate of live birth, I would be less inclined to believe that Obama could actually produce a long form birth certificate. That is not the case, infact it's the opposite.
You may have been too young to remember, but during the W Bush years the media rode bush like a pack mule about every damn thing he might or might not have done. Some of us would just like the media to give Obama the same thorough scrutiny. Is that really asking for too much?
You've got to be kidding me. Obama couldn't play on a Cuban Little League team with the evidence he has shown.
He doesn't have enough proof to be a Chinese gymnast.
If he is so right why has he spent $2,000,000.00+ and counting to hide something that would cost $8.00 to show? Where there is smoke there is fire. $1,999,992.00 is a lot of smoke. He is hiding something.
He doesn't have enough proof to be a Chinese gymnast.
If he is so right why has he spent $2,000,000.00+ and counting to hide something that would cost $8.00 to show? Where there is smoke there is fire. $1,999,992.00 is a lot of smoke. He is hiding something.
That is the problem, GW Bush got it from EVERY station, now it is just one station giving the POTUS the microscope treatment.
Other stations won't say a bad thing about the POTUS, and only report on the neutral/ good stuff.
See how Fox news can claim Fair & Balanced, they hit every POTUS just as hard.
The 3 major networks hammered Bush every night, now they lead the news with the story about how the POTUS has turned the Libyan mission over to the UN and this means the US is not opening a new front
They forget the UN is majority funded by the US ( almost as much as UK & France combined ), and the European Commander is a US military person.
The next story, the POTUS has released a budget recommendation that is fairly distributed in the cuts unlike Ryan's plan.
- No mention of where these recommended cuts were in the budget he had to have submitted by the 2nd Monday in FEB-11. What was that budget then, and why did he wait until Ryan called it out as BS to do something useful ?
The fact that you think the POTUS is being correctly criticized by the media means the brain washing is working, you do not bother to verify what is really going on, and take the 3 major networks / some blog by some unknowing reporter's word for it.
The reason I say this, you are reciting the party line from the main stream media almost verbatim, you do not have an original thought in any of your posts.
Other stations won't say a bad thing about the POTUS, and only report on the neutral/ good stuff.
See how Fox news can claim Fair & Balanced, they hit every POTUS just as hard.
The 3 major networks hammered Bush every night, now they lead the news with the story about how the POTUS has turned the Libyan mission over to the UN and this means the US is not opening a new front
They forget the UN is majority funded by the US ( almost as much as UK & France combined ), and the European Commander is a US military person.
The next story, the POTUS has released a budget recommendation that is fairly distributed in the cuts unlike Ryan's plan.
- No mention of where these recommended cuts were in the budget he had to have submitted by the 2nd Monday in FEB-11. What was that budget then, and why did he wait until Ryan called it out as BS to do something useful ?
The fact that you think the POTUS is being correctly criticized by the media means the brain washing is working, you do not bother to verify what is really going on, and take the 3 major networks / some blog by some unknowing reporter's word for it.
The reason I say this, you are reciting the party line from the main stream media almost verbatim, you do not have an original thought in any of your posts.
@ conservatives:
Would you have joined the Liberals in insisting that Obama show prove of his authentic BC if he were a republican president or would you be defending Obama?
@ Liberals:
Would you still be defending Obama regarding his BC if he were a republican president or would you be adamant in insisting to see his authentic BC?
Would you have joined the Liberals in insisting that Obama show prove of his authentic BC if he were a republican president or would you be defending Obama?
@ Liberals:
Would you still be defending Obama regarding his BC if he were a republican president or would you be adamant in insisting to see his authentic BC?
@ conservatives:
Would you have joined the Liberals in insisting that Obama show prove of his authentic BC if he were a republican president or would you be defending Obama?
@ Liberals:
Would you still be defending Obama regarding his BC if he were a republican president or would you be adamant in insisting to see his authentic BC?
Would you have joined the Liberals in insisting that Obama show prove of his authentic BC if he were a republican president or would you be defending Obama?
@ Liberals:
Would you still be defending Obama regarding his BC if he were a republican president or would you be adamant in insisting to see his authentic BC?


