An illegal immigrant picks up a hooker..





"Hey, sista, how much you charge for da hour?" he says,

"$100" she says.



In broken English, he says,

"Do you do immigrant style?"

"No"

she says.

"I pay you $200 to do immigrant style."

"No,"

she says, not knowing what immigrant style is.


"I pay you $300."


"No,"

she says.

"I pay you $400."

"No,"

she says.

So finally he says,

"OK, I pay $1,000 to do immigrant style."


She thinks,

"Well, I've been in the game for over 10 years now.
I've had every kind of request from weirdoes

from every part of the world.

How bad could immigrant style be?"

So she agrees and has sex with him.

Finally, after several hours, they finish.

Exhausted, the hooker turns to him and says,

"Hey, I was expecting something

perverted and disgusting.

But that was good.

So, what exactly is immigrant style?"

The illegal immigrant replies,

"You send bill to Government."



AND THAT MY FRIENDLY TAXPAYERS,

IS EXACTLY WHAT THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

ARE DOING TO US!

 

I should laugh because it is funny but as a hard working taxpayer I'm pretty damn sick of beign the butt of the joke.

 

For the last time people, stop barking at the wrong tree! It's not the "illegals" taking advantage of us hard working American tax payers. But our own government, both parties who have ruled in the past and are now ruling the country, are the ones responsible for the illegal immigration issues we now face.

"THEY" are the ones who don't impliment the laws that are written in black and WHITE. "THEY" are the ones who allow these people to freely roam the country as if they owned it. The ones we should be vex with is the US Government period!

 

As I always say; "It would be a lot funnier if it wasn't my money...."

 

 

I will agree with you, the gov is allowing it to happen, but how do those who knowingly break the law get off unscathed on the topic ?

To make an analogy, yellow lights at traffic signals.
Used to be that meant light is changing slow down, and prepare to stop. Over the years of not enforcing the yellow light laws, traffic is now conditioned to read a yellow signal light as " hurry up, 3 or 4 more cars can make it".
There are those that still pay attention to legal meaning of a yellow light ( i.e. slow down to stop ), and someone behind them is using the self defined term of hurry up, plows into the back of that person.

Is the accident the fault of the LEOs not enforcing traffic laws, or the person that decided to knowingly violate the law ( and use their own version of it ) ?

 

Good point on your analogy but the end result is still the same.
Laws are written but not implemented; as a result, people ignore and or make excuses to break the law. In your analogy, obviously the violator is at fault but if the lawbreaker isn't punished for his actions then who's fault would it be?

True story:

I was once given a 250 dollar ticket for trespassing into an off road area. A gate was in place but it was wide open at the time. Not giving it a second thought, I made my way in. Later in the day I encounter a ranger roaming the area who stopped me and said I shouldn't have been there because the place was closed. To which I responded, the gate was open so I figured the place was open too. He retorted, "If the gate was open was because either you opened it or other off roaders did. Regardless of which version maybe true, there is a sign posted on the gate that reads 'Closed Do NOT Enter'. You did not stop and read the sign, you did not see the sign, you didn't know, whatever the reason maybe you violated the law and I'm gonna write you a ticket. Put it this way, you are on an open road with signs posted, 70 MPH but you don't see the signs and you decide to do 100 mph, CHP pulls you over, do you think he will let you go with out a ticket? My guess would be NO!"

He was right, because he implementing the law, now, I always stop and look for warning signs every time I approach an off road area. If he didn't implement the law I would still be breaking it.

 

For violating the law? The person who is breaking the law is at fault.
Does not matter if he is caught or not, the person not following the law is accountable for his / her actions.

Not too sure about CA, but in IL 'ignorance of the law' is no defense.
85% sure the federal laws are the same way.
It is part of the responsibility of being in the country, you have rights, but with those rights come a bunch of responsibilities, and knowing the law is one of them.

When I 1st started working in Europe, I did not realize undertaking was not only against the law, but also a serious traffic violation in Germany.
I entered the country, I was expected to know and follow all the laws, rules and regulations.

The state or Polizei were not taking any part of the accountability in my actions.

This is an extreme case example, but it shows where personal accountability and responsibility start and end, with the person.
In your example, I would guess there is a section in the CA criminal code about the topic of off roading, and if you are doing it, you are expected to know that section, same as driving on the road and pushing a yellow light.

The federal government is having an issue with enforcing laws ( finger in the dike problem ), while states pass laws that countermand the desired actions of the federal government.
Then some states make their own rules on immigration enforcement, and everybody is up in arms over it, and wants it stopped. So at the benefit of a voting block, the "harsh" state law is counter acted.

So blaming the federal government in general is a loosing game, 1 side wants to cap the pipe, and when they try to the other side to garner votes counter acts it.

 

stossel's freeloaders is a great special that really sums things up well, saw it this sunday

 

Illegal is illegal. Send them home and don't give them anything more than a ride. I am all for legal immigration. Come here legally, learn English and enjoy the American way.

 

That would never work. ******, like lawyers and doctors insist on being paid up front.

 

Okay. And what are you doing about it?