Pastor Terry Jones burning the quran....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 11:02 PM
  #61  
blu3expy's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SSCULLY
No I just read. The words are there for everyone to use.

Just takes having an open mind, and not having ( or letting ) a background or belief stand in the way of logic and reason with what you are reading.
If you have an open mind, you can know what questions to ask about a topic.
run for president, you got my vote! and the endorsement of f150 online
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 11:18 PM
  #62  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by SSCULLY
Might want to check a history book and post some kind of fact, saying the same thing a 2nd time does not explain it.

The pope ~ 1000 AD is the one that called the Crusades to take the Holy Land / Jerusalem from the people that were there ( pope claimed it belonged to them "rightfully" ).

Crusaders defeated two main Turkish forces at Dorylaeum and Antioch and then they marched to Jerusalem, and massacred the people there.

So now how did the Turkish Muslims instigate the Crusades by getting attacked by a Christian army ?

With this logic, if someone sucker punches you from behind, you started the fight....
Google is your friend. Plenty of reading material out there besides the one-sided history from our liberal teachers/textbooks.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 11:24 PM
  #63  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by JackandJanet
Believe/disbelieve what you want Frank. You always do. You MUST have noticed I did not say "jail". You did.

- Jack
Ok. So you are saying he should be placed in an asylum for burning a book? If so, it's obvious that you have a one-sided view of the 1st Amendment.

We can't cherry-pick who has rights and who does not. I would never like to see a copy of the Bible burned, but it would be a protected act.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 05:59 AM
  #64  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Originally Posted by Frank S
Google is your friend. Plenty of reading material out there besides the one-sided history from our liberal teachers/textbooks.
Google is where I got the detail from.
I knew the basic facts on the topic, and went and did 3 source fact checking on the basics and in the process got details in the supporting material.

This is an attempt to say the same thing a 3rd time.

Remember Common History Books
I get the hint that the "liberal teachers/textbooks" comment means you want me to use a non fact checked history source, which I will not do.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 06:29 AM
  #65  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Originally Posted by Frank S
Ok. So you are saying he should be placed in an asylum for burning a book? ....<snip>......
No he did not say that, that is your inferring & twisting of the statement...

Re-read the post:

Originally Posted by JackandJanet
The simple fact is, there are people who claim to follow a religion who think their "god" is not powerful enough to "defend" him/her/it (take your pick) self. They see it as their "calling" to act on his/her/its (take your pick) behalf.

The nutcase Terry Jones is one of these. He should be locked up. The fanatics who commit murder over some perceived insult to their "sacred book" are more of the same.

Intolerance is NOT religion! It is a perversion.

I'm going to agree with Stealth here, but I'll go a bit further - they're all perverted.

- Jack
Clearly does not say anything even remotely close to what you think it does. The Pro-Form is referring to the sentence above.
 

Last edited by SSCULLY; Apr 7, 2011 at 12:46 PM. Reason: Corrected where I accidently cliped part of the quote - Copied the quote again
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 06:50 AM
  #66  
Norm's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook,NH
Originally Posted by Frank S
The Crusades were instigated by Turkish Muslims. And no, I'm not Catholic and do not support the Crusades by either them or the Muslims.
The Crusaders were Christians. They could have stayed home. Saying the Muslims instigated the Crusades is like saying we instigated 9/11 because we support Israel.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 12:41 PM
  #67  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by SSCULLY
No he did not say that, that is your inferring & twisting of the statement...

Re-read the post:



Clearly does not say anything even remotely close to what you think it does.
You're missing part of J&J's post, particularly the part where he mentions Jones should be locked up. Hard for me to drag up quotes on the mobile version of the site. :o
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 12:56 PM
  #68  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Originally Posted by Stealth
You're missing part of J&J's post, particularly the part where he mentions Jones should be locked up. Hard for me to drag up quotes on the mobile version of the site. :o
Yep, corrected that.

Also added the reference to the pro form at the end, just to clarify how it does not say what Frank S's post indicates it does.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 07:26 PM
  #69  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
I believe Frank's argument is mainly based on the 'locked up' part of the quote, but I'm not him so I can't say. :o
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 08:58 PM
  #70  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Originally Posted by Stealth
I believe Frank's argument is mainly based on the 'locked up' part of the quote, but I'm not him so I can't say. :o
Frank's post :
So you are saying he should be placed in an asylum for burning a book?
This is not what Jack posted.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 09:05 PM
  #71  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by SSCULLY
Frank's post :


This is not what Jack posted.
So-so semantics. Insane asylum and locked up mean the same thing to most people when the subject is regarding nutcases.

I can see the correlation, though I've already said my speak on the topic.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 09:08 PM
  #72  
SSCULLY's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Originally Posted by Stealth
So-so semantics. Insane asylum and locked up mean the same thing to most people when the subject is regarding nutcases.

I can see the correlation, though I've already said my speak on the topic.
That is not the question Frank seems to have, it is the reason why.

Frank made up his own reason, and applied it to Jack.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 09:11 PM
  #73  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
True. These are curious cases.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2011 | 09:13 PM
  #74  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by SSCULLY
That is not the question Frank seems to have, it is the reason why.

Frank made up his own reason, and applied it to Jack.
Locked up usually means placed in prison or an asylum to most people.

Maybe Jack will enlighten us as to his intentions for someone exercising their right to free speech.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2011 | 12:06 AM
  #75  
JackandJanet's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,890
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Originally Posted by Frank S
Locked up usually means placed in prison or an asylum to most people.

Maybe Jack will enlighten us as to his intentions for someone exercising their right to free speech.
Oh Frank -

My record on the subject of "Free Speech" is clear. All you have to do is review my past posts on this issue. I've even said, "The First Amendment trumps all others."

Now please, the Supreme Court has wrestled with this issue over and over again. Yes, you have the freedom to express your opinion, as long as it does not harm others.

Listening to you, it sounds like you are suddenly advocating total freedom: No problem with Koran burnings, no problem with Bible burnings, no problem with Cross burnings, no problem with racial epithets, no problem with child pornography, and so on and so on. Yes, I know you did not say these things, just as I did not say the things you have ascribed to me.

Now, please - this sophomoric diatribe is getting most tedious. I know you are trying to catch me in a contradiction, but there is none. I strongly support free speech, unless it infringes on the rights, freedoms, or closely held beliefs of other members of our World society. When it goes that far, discretion is necessary. Any other opinion is uncivilized.

And, to continue this discussion is pointless and childish.

- Jack
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:14 AM.