British tree huggers want you to stop global warming.
got to start somewhere right? But the starting point should be here in the US primarily California, Arizona, and Texas then completely wipe out mexico. That would be the epitome to the phrase, "Kill two birds with one stone" we put an end to the illegal immigration problem and make a lil dent on population growth.
ill be lucky to see 9 mpg this tank
Ill run my truck an extra 10 minutes and 10 seconds at 10:10AM tomorrow.

Very few people drive the sort of cars that get 70mpg.
I don't know why you would hate them. It's actually much more cruel to eat a deer while it's still alive.
I think that better fuel economy is a great thing. I don't think it's worth slaughtering people over. Maybe the video is just a joke, but what they are saying is that you don't have a choice. They are going to force this on us. That's what I have a problem with.
I think that better fuel economy is a great thing. I don't think it's worth slaughtering people over. Maybe the video is just a joke, but what they are saying is that you don't have a choice. They are going to force this on us. That's what I have a problem with.
Dont worry, he's probably just joking (kinda like the video joking about pushing a button to blow people up that dont conform to one group's views). If a bullet really was much more cruel and less selectively precise than disease, parasites and starvation then you wouldn't be able to buy a hunting license. That is why there are specific limits on how many deer you can "harvest" aka remove from the population.
A well informed person who doesn't have their head up where the sun don't shine would know that without any selective predator a wild population will eventually deplete it's resources until the population and environment reach equilibrium. To do this, the animal population will go through many cycles of overgrazing (in the case of deer and other herbavores) leading to starvation/stress (leading to increased weakened resistance to parasites and disease) and above equilibrium growth. Can't argue that there are enough predators because there aren't most of the time..."people" displaced many of them or at least hampered their populations for humanity's own good.
With this in mind dont feed the troll.
A well informed person who doesn't have their head up where the sun don't shine would know that without any selective predator a wild population will eventually deplete it's resources until the population and environment reach equilibrium. To do this, the animal population will go through many cycles of overgrazing (in the case of deer and other herbavores) leading to starvation/stress (leading to increased weakened resistance to parasites and disease) and above equilibrium growth. Can't argue that there are enough predators because there aren't most of the time..."people" displaced many of them or at least hampered their populations for humanity's own good.
With this in mind dont feed the troll.
Last edited by Longshot270; Oct 3, 2010 at 11:07 PM.


