Tea Party movement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 06:08 PM
  #31  
4.6 Punisher's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 10
From: Douglasville GA
Ah, gotcha.
 
Reply
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 07:11 PM
  #32  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
I encourage the Tea Baggies to go at it!!! With some luck, the strife in the GOP will bring it down and make people wake up.

I hear..."I want less government, less regulation!"

What do you want less regulated? Your food supply? Deregulation has led to salmonella outbreaks in eggs. The oil companies? The price of gasoline has tripled in 10 years. The environment is getting beat up. Wall St? Their crookedness led us to the great recession.

Uncontrolled regulation just to make government bigger is stupid. Unfortunately we have to have it to check those that try to cheat the system. Regulation that is done intelligently and effectively is smart. We need to find that again.

I hear the free market will fix all...ok then lets get rid of the police and courts. Let people handle everything. Guess what? You would have crime skyrocketing, people murdered in the streets at a rate that makes today's gang stuff look like nothing and we would all suffer.

Regulations were put in place because some occurrence happened that uncovered a need. Are they sometimes knee jerk and over done? Yes but it can get out of hand.

I hear they want to cut government but where? Powers to the states? Many of the states governments are useless (Illinois). We have had our last two governors convicted of felonies (1 Dem 1 Rep). I don't think so.

Our spending needs reigned in, no question about it. However, it needs to be done rationally. Cutting Medicare and Social Security is idiotic. People need those safety nets. What would have happened to the value of the SS trust fund if it had been privatized under Bush before the recession hit and the market crashed? It would be like most people's 401k plans in the toilet.

Let's bring in some spending on defense. We spend more than the next 9 countries combined in defense spending. Much on things the military doesn't even want. Can we say pork barrel??

Let's cut the tax incentives out there to send our jobs overseas?

Let's cut the tax loopholes for big oil? They are the most profitable companies out there. Anyone think Exxon-Mobil or Conoco Phillips are hurting?

Employers know they have to spend money to make it. They aren't going to forgo profits to save taxes. That is stupid. They want to be efficient so no they won't just hire people to sit on their butts.

As far as having more parties in the mix. Sure...it would be a good thing. Right now we have too many people only there to vote their party instead of their constituents best interest.
Quit being stupid.
 
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 11:54 AM
  #33  
oldnnew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Clarence, NY
If anyone reads that Yahoo! news GARBAGE, you're nuts. The Tea Party movement is made up of Republicans, Democrats, and Independants. It is a very big movement that is going to steamroll in the elections in November. Look at the Republican primary race for governor in NY. Carl Paladino, a developer from Buffalo, totally destroyed his challenger, Rick Lazio in the primary. The funny thing is, the word going around is that there were numerous DEMOCRATS wanting to vote in the Republican primary for Paladino, but obviously could not, because they were dems. SO, I think November is going to be VERY exciting! Time to get this country back on track!
 

Last edited by oldnnew; Sep 17, 2010 at 11:56 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 11:59 AM
  #34  
oldnnew's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: Clarence, NY
Originally Posted by Super FX4
Quit being stupid.

I agree. See, people like this don't think rationally. Typical left wing garbage.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 12:22 PM
  #35  
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Super FX4
Quit being stupid.
Just because someone doesn't agree with your position doesn't make them stupid. The marketplace of ideas is what our governmental system was built on.

If everyone believed the way the Teabaggies did, we would still live like the old west and have people being shot in the streets to settle arguments.

The Teabaggies have no ideas. Just the idea...lets cut government, but where is all I ask. Have some ideas! Realizing something is broken is easy, fixing it is more difficult.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 02:05 PM
  #36  
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
If everyone believed the way the Teabaggies did, we would still live like the old west and have people being shot in the streets to settle arguments.
Quit being stupid.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 02:47 PM
  #37  
1depd's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 1
From: Gulf Coast
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
Just because someone doesn't agree with your position doesn't make them stupid. The marketplace of ideas is what our governmental system was built on.

If everyone believed the way the Teabaggies did, we would still live like the old west and have people being shot in the streets to settle arguments.

The Teabaggies have no ideas. Just the idea...lets cut government, but where is all I ask. Have some ideas! Realizing something is broken is easy, fixing it is more difficult.
Here's an idea, start with some old document called the Constitution. Any agency or function of the federal government not specifically mentioned in that document is on the chopping block. Any function that is not a direct relation to a function in that document is at the top of the list for chopping. So things like federal health and human services, department of education, department of energy, department of agriculture are on the chopping block. It is fine to grow the government when we can afford it to a point. That point has come and gone and the government is way to large now. We can't afford the government during the best of times and these are far from good times. We either cut the government or we go bankrupt, which do you want?
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #38  
screwyou's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Teabag K-Mac!!!

Sounds right......you game K-Mac?
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #39  
screwyou's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by dirt bike dave
Quit being stupid.
I see this being the new movement...."Quite being stupid." Only fitting that K-Fed is leading the charge.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 03:21 PM
  #40  
Wade06XLT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Tarpon Springs, FL, USA
Obama and second chance????? Now that's an oxymoron if I've ever heard one.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 04:36 PM
  #41  
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by 1depd
Here's an idea, start with some old document called the Constitution. Any agency or function of the federal government not specifically mentioned in that document is on the chopping block. Any function that is not a direct relation to a function in that document is at the top of the list for chopping. So things like federal health and human services, department of education, department of energy, department of agriculture are on the chopping block. It is fine to grow the government when we can afford it to a point. That point has come and gone and the government is way to large now. We can't afford the government during the best of times and these are far from good times. We either cut the government or we go bankrupt, which do you want?
So when we cut everything and have bad air, dangerous food, bad water, and even worse schools...we can turn out another generation of voters that are greedy and only worry about having their taxes cut.

We have tons of waste in our government. No question and yes much of the pork can be cut. That being said, the reason these regulators came about to begin with is because a need was there and more than likely still is there today.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 05:02 PM
  #42  
1depd's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 1
From: Gulf Coast
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
So when we cut everything and have bad air, dangerous food, bad water, and even worse schools...we can turn out another generation of voters that are greedy and only worry about having their taxes cut.

We have tons of waste in our government. No question and yes much of the pork can be cut. That being said, the reason these regulators came about to begin with is because a need was there and more than likely still is there today.
The federal government CAN'T keep spending more than it takes in, period. If they do, the few sections not cut wouldn't matter anyway because we won't have the money to pay for them either. It is s tough spot, but thanks to previous generations we are here and we need to do something. Failure to do something will result in not being able to do anything (the government and economy will collapse). With few exceptions ALL government expenditures are discretionary. That means just about all government expenditures are not necessary. There is nothing in my statements that say the states, counties, and cities couldn't take up many of the issues handled by the feds.

I once asked a friend why our generation is called generation X. Their answer was, "because everything has been done and we have nothing else to complete. We are essentially a lost generation". I disagreed then and I still disagree. We need to fix what was broken by previous generations.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 06:01 PM
  #43  
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
I agree that spending has to be curtailed. We spend a LOT more than we take in and of course disaster is soon to follow.

We actually had budget surpluses going when Clinton was in office and then Bush pushed through a huge tax cut and that was all gone.

Just cutting taxes doesn't fix things or we wouldn't have been in the shape we were during and ending with Bush's time in office.

It has to be responsible, you can't just close government. The problem with the states doing things is they are in just as bad of shape.
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 06:13 PM
  #44  
tommy grantham's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: milton Florida
 
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2010 | 06:16 PM
  #45  
screwyou's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
I agree that spending has to be curtailed. We spend a LOT more than we take in and of course disaster is soon to follow.

We actually had budget surpluses going when Clinton was in office and then Bush pushed through a huge tax cut and that was all gone.

Just cutting taxes doesn't fix things or we wouldn't have been in the shape we were during and ending with Bush's time in office.

It has to be responsible, you can't just close government. The problem with the states doing things is they are in just as bad of shape.
You do realize the Republicans were the majority of Legislative Branch during the surplus of the Clinton years and the Democrats were the majority who spent and created this mess during the last two years of Bush's Presidency.

The President is only one man....vice the Legislative Branch is the People's choice to represent them. It's been nearly four years of a Democratic controled Congress......what a mess. Plus it doesn't help with the Idiot-In-Chief.
 

Last edited by screwyou; Sep 18, 2010 at 06:18 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:30 AM.