To bomb, or not to bomb... that is the question ...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 01:37 PM
  #1  
MGDfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 10
To bomb, or not to bomb... that is the question ...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010...y-bolton-says/

Agree or disagree?

This one has the potential to escalate into a CF to end all CF's... given the nutcase regime.

Remember Osirak? Is history about to repeat itself? http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/docs/41osi.html

MGD
 

Last edited by MGDfan; Aug 17, 2010 at 01:39 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 02:13 PM
  #2  
Average-Joe's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Outer Hebrides
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 02:39 PM
  #3  
ChrisT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,986
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Maryland
^^
 
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2010 | 04:06 PM
  #4  
dirt bike dave's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
If Israel so much as lifts a finger against the Iranian nuke program, I'm sure our President will insist upon sanctions...against Israel.

My guess is the White House has already warned Israel in no uncertain terms they better do nothing... or else.

So the Israelis won't stop it, in hopes we will control Iran later. But we won't.

Therefore, the first few Iranian nukes will be used against Israel within the next 5 years.

Others will then be used in Europe, the USA, etc...

The radical muslim extremists probably won't nuke us until we get a president who truly opposes them, so we've got 2.5 - 6.5 years before we have to worry about it.

Sure, we'll eventually declare war on Iran after they nuke us. By then, tens of thousands of Israeli's, Europeans and Americans will be killed.

So it goes. But it's all Bush's fault, right? I hear he made the Iranians hate us. If only Bush had been nicer to the Iranians...
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 PM.