Teabaggers=Terrorists?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 08:29 PM
  #46  
Carlsson3's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Those damnable violent racist Tea-Party freaks will stop at nothing. Wait wait-- it's really an Islamo-**** orc masquerading as an insanely violent racist Tea-Party person. Wait wait wait-- what's he doing attacking a Republican congressman? Will these vile Tea-Party people stop at nothing in their twisted reverse psychology methods of manipulation and terror?

No, you would not see this on the MSM delivery.


http://www.jihadwatch.org/2010/03/mu...-final-yo.html
 
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 10:55 PM
  #47  
wittom's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
YES! Finally, I found proof of the hateful, racist teabaggers being terrorists!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t7IH...layer_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fk8gX...layer_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pT-SS...layer_embedded

The one thing that I don't understand is, why are the teabaggers holding signs for Harry Reid?

 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 07:43 AM
  #48  
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
The last couple years of the Clinton Administration had budget surpluses and those were supposed to last for 10 years if his budget would have been stuck with. However, when W. came into office, he punched through a massive tax break for the wealthiest 1% of Americans. That did a lot of good for the economy, huh? Trickle down?

Yes, I will admit he had some things happen on his watch that were extraordinary. Some he handled fairly well and others dismally.

Regardless of what, he added over 6 Trillion to our debt in 8 years! So much for being a Conservative!!! At lease Obama isn't claiming to be a conservative. This is astounding considering he was on pace for surpluses.

I would much rather see our money go to social programs like education and health care than war. I understand war is a reality of a country to maintain its freedom but while we had an obligation to protect ourselves in going into Afghanistan, we had no business in Iraq. The rest of the world sent troops to Afghanistan to help us. We went it alone (with Great Britons help) in Iraq and our closest ally even has pulled out realizing it was a bad bill of goods.

The constitution gives us the right to protest. The problem with the Tea Baggers is they 1) are idiots for dressing up as tea bags 2) have an agenda of NO which moves nothing forward 3) have a mouthpiece in Sarah Palin whose 15 minutes of fame was over so long ago!
 

Last edited by K-Mac Attack; Apr 1, 2010 at 07:45 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 08:13 AM
  #49  
Raoul's Avatar
Certified Goat Breeder
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 19
From: the moral high ground
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
...3) have a mouthpiece in Sarah Palin...
I have heard talk of a Palin Presidential Tea Party bid.
This would be a disaster for the Right.

I offer up the following:
1992 Perot (No Party) 19% of the vote = Clinton win
1996 Perot (Reform) 8% of the vote = Clinton win
2000 Nader (Green) 3% of the vote = Bush won NH & FL directly from Gore votes that went to Nader. Either state would have given Gore the White House.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 08:41 AM
  #50  
Carlsson3's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
The Myth of the Clinton Surplus

Read the whole thing.

http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 09:31 AM
  #51  
Raoul's Avatar
Certified Goat Breeder
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,182
Likes: 19
From: the moral high ground
Originally Posted by Carlsson3
Read the whole thing.
I did and was amused.
Craig goes to great lengths to expose "...Washington doublespeak and political smoke and mirrors"
...then proceeds to use the same tactic himself.

"...However, the total amount refunded to taxpayers was only $38 billion . So even if we assume that $38 billion of the FY2001 deficit was due to Bush's tax refunds which were not part of Clinton's last budget, that still means that Clinton's last budget produced a deficit of 133.29 - 38 = $95.29 billion...."

1- He infers the Bush tax cut in 2001 totaled $38 Billion.
2- He takes the unaccounted for remainder (maybe $100 Billion?) of Bush's cut for '01 and assigns it to Clinton's budget.

Ahhh, ...I love the smell of cooked books in the morning.
 
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2010 | 09:42 AM
  #52  
harleydude78's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
Originally Posted by Carlsson3
Thanks for the link man! Very informative article.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 07:37 AM
  #53  
wittom's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Teabaggers at it again? This clearly shows that these teabaggers are racist, homophobic morons! Doesn't it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pn0HdZlIDKQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO9Xy...layer_embedded
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 11:08 AM
  #54  
Green_98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: Starkville Mississippi
KMac:

1. If Sarah Palin's 15 minutes of fame were over, why do so many Americans side with her?
2. If we moved the liberal agenda ahead, is it really moving forward? The liberals claim its moving forward, but conservatives are saying NO because in reality, we're backing right off a cliff. The conservative agenda is basically: quit spending so much money, quit allowing increased handouts, recognize that Islam is not accepted in America, don't allow amnesty for illegals on our tax dollars, and don't hinder our industries by passing the cap and tax law or limiting us based on global warming hype.

What's so radical/****/extremist about this? Sounds very down to earth to me.\

--Just my .02 from a right-wing, God fearing,religious, gun-toting, true American radical extremist.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 11:09 AM
  #55  
Green_98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: Starkville Mississippi
I dont know why my signature appeared...it hasnt been edited in over 5 years
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 01:52 PM
  #56  
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Green_98
KMac:

1. If Sarah Palin's 15 minutes of fame were over, why do so many Americans side with her?
2. If we moved the liberal agenda ahead, is it really moving forward? The liberals claim its moving forward, but conservatives are saying NO because in reality, we're backing right off a cliff. The conservative agenda is basically: quit spending so much money, quit allowing increased handouts, recognize that Islam is not accepted in America, don't allow amnesty for illegals on our tax dollars, and don't hinder our industries by passing the cap and tax law or limiting us based on global warming hype.

What's so radical/****/extremist about this? Sounds very down to earth to me.\

--Just my .02 from a right-wing, God fearing,religious, gun-toting, true American radical extremist.
Anyone can get behind a podium and speak to middle class America and speak of days past that seemed better, speak of family values and put blame on the Progressives for our problems today. She has an audience right now because she jumped on to the Tea Party bus but it will fade.

I have no problem in cutting back on the frivolous spending we have. That said, the conservatives have been just as bad with spending as the liberals. George W. Bush's eight years in office raised the national debt more than any other president before him. He more than doubled it! Neither party is very responsible with the nation's VISA card when they get their hands on it.

I do think that we need to make sure we take care of our people. Some social programs are needed to make people more productive. No I don't think that giving people welfare forever is the solution. A safety net is one thing and a crutch is another. Encouraging work and upward movement is the right thing but you can't expect someone to be able to do anything from rock bottom without help.

As far as allowing Islam in America...what happened to Freedom of Religion? Wasn't that the primary reason people came to America to begin with? No, I don't like hearing our own citizens saying "Death to America" and such...but it is their right. When they act upon it then there is a problem of course. Any religion that requires its members to kill those that are not like them is twisted but again they can have their feelings.

I have no problem with returning illegals home. They are criminals and shouldn't be here. They are a threat to our national security and economy.

As far as the environment, we do have to protect it. It has to be global legislation though. No we cannot be the only ones it is imposed upon as that puts us at a competitive disadvantage. That said, I don't want companies disposing of toxins in my drinking water. I don't want my air to be so polluted that I need to carry an oxygen tank to go somewhere.
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 02:02 PM
  #57  
Green_98's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,895
Likes: 0
From: Starkville Mississippi
KMac, Im with you on just about all you said.

- W Bush was not a conservative, he only claimed he was. He was a liberal spender; I dont claim him as a true conservative. But what we have in office right now makes W look like a far right-wing, penny pincher.

-Sarah Palin did align herself with the tea party and Im not sure that was a good move...but she does get an awful lot of support. She's the down-to-earth, real person that people look to as Hillary and Pelosi's equivilant. She beats them hands down in every way. Not saying she's a good Presidential candidate, but could she really do more harm than what's being done right now? Nope.

-The Islamic religion needs to be kicked out of our country, period. Muslims are different. Most muslims are very nice, very warm people, however their Islamic philosophy is brutal. It gets into every nook and cranny of life, government, religion, etc. I had this debate with a muslim man and his wife last week in Wal Mart and it was nasty. We were very polite to each other, but I stared him in the eye and said that his beliefs were not welcome here and that he needs to go home to Iran, where's from. I also told his wife that it's a shame that she is held back from living a free, open life of expression and success, like the white women around her. She didn't like that. I truely believe Islam is a false religion, it's extremely radical, there is nothing peaceful about it, and it needs to be kept overseas. As an American, I take Oliver North's stance and say "we don't do that here because we're Americans."
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 02:35 PM
  #58  
harleydude78's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
I love how the violence happening in AZ at the PRO-illegal immigration rallies is getting a pass from the MSM. Cops getting stuff thrown at them to be be chased out of areas and reporters getting beat up and smacked around. Good times!
 
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:03 PM
  #59  
K-Mac Attack's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
The only problem with the AZ law is going to be in the courts. It is going to get shot down. Immigration is a Federal power and the feds don't like interference. Kind of like California's Prop 187...it turned into a cluster ****.

You're going to have a tough time kicking out Islam. Many of our citizens are Islamic. You going to start concentration camps? Have them wear yellow stars?

Taking away freedoms isn't the solution if you want a free society. I know there is a balance between freedom and security but that isn't the way to go.

I know that President Obama has spent a lot of money to kick start the economy but something had to be done. Much of the bailout of Wall St was on Bush's watch and too many put that on Obama.

The thing with Palin is that I think most of it is a front. I could be wrong but I just don't buy it. I am not saying she is as fake as Pelosi or Hillary but still she isn't a commoner either. Although she did prove she is not the brightest bulb either...I guess it worked for W...why not her?
 

Last edited by K-Mac Attack; Apr 27, 2010 at 08:12 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:21 PM
  #60  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by K-Mac Attack
The only problem with the AZ law is going to be in the courts. It is going to get shot down. Immigration is a Federal power and the feds don't like interference. Kind of like California's Prop 187...it turned into a cluster ****.

You're going to have a tough time kicking out Islam. Many of our citizens are Islamic. You going to start concentration camps? Have them wear yellow stars?

Taking away freedoms isn't the solution if you want a free society. I know there is a balance between freedom and security but that isn't the way to go.

I know that President Obama has spent a lot of money to kick start the economy but something had to be done. Much of the bailout of Wall St was on Bush's watch and too many put that on Obama.

The thing with Palin is that I think most of it is a front. I could be wrong but I just don't buy it. I am not saying she is as fake as Pelosi or Hillary but still she isn't a commoner either. Although she did prove she is not the brightest bulb either...I guess it worked for W...why not her?
And that "something" should've been nothing. Let the banks fail, let the automakers fail. They will just be broken up and sold for pennies on the dollar to management that will manage them properly.

It's astounding that today people are brainwashed into thinking that "something has to be done." We (he) is/are spending money we do not have.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:50 AM.