Unalienable rights?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 06:12 PM
  #46  
donbeeler49's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Tucson AZ
Just gotta love the "liberal think"
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 06:14 PM
  #47  
wittom's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by RileyDog
Soviet Union wasnt a socialist state. It was, and basically still is, a dictatorship.
USSR=Union of Soviet Socialist Republics?
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 06:23 PM
  #48  
RileyDog's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Maybe the original intent was socialism, but it never happened. It was the govt taking advantage of the people, for its own benefit (well, the rulers of the govt). It was an authoritarian system of govt.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 06:23 PM
  #49  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by wittom
USSR=Union of Soviet Socialist Republics?
Beat me to it wit. If Soviet Russia wasn't socialist, every history teacher/professor I ever had and every history book I have ever read and owned was/is lying.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 06:27 PM
  #50  
4.6 Punisher's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 10
From: Douglasville GA
Well when every book you own is "How to scam the American people into buying gold when you're the paid spokesperson for a gold trading company", things might get construed.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 06:29 PM
  #51  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by 4.6 Punisher
Well when every book you own is "How to scam the American people into buying gold when you're the paid spokesperson for a gold trading company", things might get construed.
If this is a scam: http://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/au3650nyb.html

I'll take it punisher.

Where I place my money has nothing to do with what a TV/radio personality or politician says.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 06:43 PM
  #52  
referee54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Columbia Station, Ohio
Originally Posted by Frank S
Beat me to it wit. If Soviet Russia wasn't socialist, every history teacher/professor I ever had and every history book I have ever read and owned was/is lying.
IF you use that argument, then the German DEMOCRATIC Republic (formerly known as East Germany, was therefore democratic. What they say they were---"socialist" or "Democratic"---and what they were---communist--were two different ideas.

Besides, isn't North Korea the Democratic People's Repbulic of Korea? That makes them democratic, according to your argument, too, right? Two of them were, and the third is, a communist dictatorship.

Se, I guess your argument about "socialist" does not hold up real well. Frank/Tom---look up the difference between a socialist country and a communist country.

TSC
 

Last edited by referee54; Jan 14, 2010 at 06:47 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 07:01 PM
  #53  
Frank S's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 1998
Posts: 1,719
Likes: 1
From: Blue Ridge Mountains, GA
Originally Posted by referee54
IF you use that argument, then the German DEMOCRATIC Republic (formerly known as East Germany, was therefore democratic. What they say they were---"socialist" or "Democratic"---and what they were---communist--were two different ideas.

Besides, isn't North Korea the Democratic People's Repbulic of Korea? That makes them democratic, according to your argument, too, right? Two of them were, and the third is, a communist dictatorship.

Se, I guess your argument about "socialist" does not hold up real well. Frank/Tom---look up the difference between a socialist country and a communist country.

TSC
My post was mainly a response to RD's post. Russia was socialist/communist. (they actually had communes) No offense ref, but Russian history I have studied extensively.

Settle down, daddy's home.
 

Last edited by Frank S; Jan 14, 2010 at 07:05 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 07:44 PM
  #54  
referee54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Columbia Station, Ohio
Originally Posted by Frank S
My post was mainly a response to RD's post. Russia was socialist/communist. (they actually had communes) No offense ref, but Russian history I have studied extensively.

Settle down, daddy's home.
What are you going to do? Ground me? Then I get to spend more time with you guys...and now you are punishng yourselves!

TSC
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 08:15 PM
  #55  
4.6 Punisher's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 10
From: Douglasville GA
Originally Posted by Frank S
If this is a scam: http://www.kitco.com/charts/popup/au3650nyb.html

I'll take it punisher.

Where I place my money has nothing to do with what a TV/radio personality or politician says.
I wouldn't start putting money into gold now, maybe like 10 years ago. Now's the time to be mashing the sell button and retiring early.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 08:53 PM
  #56  
1depd's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 691
Likes: 1
From: Gulf Coast
Originally Posted by referee54
So were you one of the guys PO'd at the trucking company for the way the let the drivers go? According to you, it shouldn't matter. Sucks to be them, right? Leeches on society, right? Or were they hard-working folks that, for a fault that was not theirs, "fell through the cracks'?
Actually a few posts ago was the first I heard of it. Does it make me angry? Nope not a bit. It is called private industry. Layoffs are expected. Nobody owes anybody a job. Realizing this leads one to not live beyond their means and to constantly upgrade their skill set.

Originally Posted by referee54
I want to be there when you tell your loved one, "Sorry, Honey, suffering is life."
I don't have to tell any of my loved ones that. My whole family has been through extended periods of suffering. Suffering happens they realize it. There is no sense in pointing it out.

Originally Posted by referee54
Health care reform is due. The govt does not need to run it, but this idea that everybody that does not have health care are leeches and a burden to society---well, they are ll lazy and do not want to work!. Ask those like the truck drivers in the previous thread if they like your idea of "Suffering is life---get used to it." (That's what your actually saying, right?)

If we extend your attitude that "Suffering is life", does it matter how those truck drivers were notified about their loss of jobs? After All,"Suffering is life", is it not? Too bad that they, hard-working guys, cannot now have the health insurance for their families. Because they lost their jobs, they have become leeches.

If the truck drivers were living below their means then they would have money to pay for COBRA. They would also have savings to last while they are on unemployment to keep from going broke. Nobody is going to look out for you, so do it yourself.

Originally Posted by referee54
What do I say to the two boys the man left behind? "Hey guys, sorry about your dad, but suffering is life." He wanted to work, but after his place of employment shut down, he had trouble finding a job. He also became ill, and, because he no health insurance, he (I believe) died before his time. I am not saying that he would have survived his liver problems, but he may have lived longer...he could not fight the disease on his own. He took care of his family as well as himself, but the lack of a job combined with his illness did not allow him to procure the insurance---and the treatment---that he needed.

TSC
So apparently this man did not live below his means and did not have The money to pay for COBRA. So according to my world view he failed to take care of himself, so yes, it sucks to be him. It sucks even more for his children.

Yes I am this heartless in my own life. Call it an artifact of taking care of myself at a young age, compounded by military and LE training. It helps when I get into situations, both professionally and personally, that are very high in emotion.
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 09:18 PM
  #57  
referee54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Columbia Station, Ohio
Originally Posted by 1depd
Actually a few posts ago was the first I heard of it. Does it make me angry? Nope not a bit. It is called private industry. Layoffs are expected. Nobody owes anybody a job. Realizing this leads one to not live beyond their means and to constantly upgrade their skill set.



I don't have to tell any of my loved ones that. My whole family has been through extended periods of suffering. Suffering happens they realize it. There is no sense in pointing it out.




If the truck drivers were living below their means then they would have money to pay for COBRA. They would also have savings to last while they are on unemployment to keep from going broke. Nobody is going to look out for you, so do it yourself.



So apparently this man did not live below his means and did not have The money to pay for COBRA. So according to my world view he failed to take care of himself, so yes, it sucks to be him. It sucks even more for his children.

Yes I am this heartless in my own life. Call it an artifact of taking care of myself at a young age, compounded by military and LE training. It helps when I get into situations, both professionally and personally, that are very high in emotion.
My understanding is that the man barely made ends meet while he was employed. It is hard to "live below your means"---when you barely make enough to make the payments. Yes, I too took care of myself at a young age, and I basically worked my way through college and grad school; don't give me any of that stuff---I know the value of hard work for myself. You call it an artifact; I call it an excuse. Suffer on.

TSC
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 10:12 PM
  #58  
wittom's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by referee54
So, I guess your argument about "socialist" does not hold up real well. Frank/Tom---look up the difference between a socialist country and a communist country.
What argument? Someone said that the USSR wasn't a socialist state. Clearly it was. No argument.

Words have different definitions and meanings according to how they are applied. Or, at least I would assume.



Originally Posted by Merriam-Webster
Democracy-

1 a : government by the people; especially : rule of the majority b : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
2 : a political unit that has a democratic government
3 capitalized : the principles and policies of the Democratic party in the United States <from emancipation Republicanism to New Deal Democracy — C. M. Roberts>
4 : the common people especially when constituting the source of political authority
5 : the absence of hereditary or arbitrary class distinctions or privileges


Social democracy-

1 : a political movement advocating a gradual and peaceful transition from capitalism to socialism by democratic means
2 : a democratic welfare state that incorporates both capitalist and socialist practices

Pure democracy-

democracy in which the power is exercised directly by the people rather than through representatives

Democratic-

1 : of, relating to, or favoring democracy
2 often capitalized : of or relating to one of the two major political parties in the United States evolving in the early 19th century from the anti-federalists and the Democratic-Republican party and associated in modern times with policies of broad social reform and internationalism
3 : relating to, appealing to, or available to the broad masses of the people <democratic art>
4 : favoring social equality : not snobbish

Republic-

1 a (1) : a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president (2) : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government b (1) : a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law (2) : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government c : a usually specified republican government of a political unit <the French Fourth Republic>
2 : a body of persons freely engaged in a specified activity <the republic of letters>
3 : a constituent political and territorial unit of the former nations of Czechoslovakia, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or Yugoslavia


Originally Posted by Wikipedia
A Socialist country is a country where the government or the public as a whole has control over the economy. In a socialist country, the producing and dispersing of goods is owned by the government. Socialism is placed in between capitalism and communism.

Communism is a political way of thinking and idea of how society should work and be organized. Communism is a kind of socialism that says that there should not be social classes or states. Communism says that the people of any and every place in the world should all own the tools, factories, and farms that are used to produce goods and food. This social process is known as common ownership. In a communist society, there is no private property.
Originally Posted by WikiAnswers
Both socialism and communism are based on the principle that the goods and services produced in an economy should be owned publicly and controlled and planned by a centralized organization. However, socialism asserts that the distribution should take place according to the amount of individuals' production efforts, while communism asserts that that goods and services should be distributed among the populace according to individuals' needs.
WikiAnswers
 
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 10:22 PM
  #59  
referee54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Columbia Station, Ohio
Tom, the USSR was communist---other European countries are socialist; you supplied your own answer.

Communism is a political way of thinking and idea of how society should work and be organized. Communism is a kind of socialism that says that there should not be social classes or states. Communism says that the people of any and every place in the world should all own the tools, factories, and farms that are used to produce goods and food. This social process is known as common ownership. In a communist society, there is no private property.

The former Soviet Union was communist; there was no private property; everything was owned by the state. In a socialist country, there is indeed private enterprise and it is allowed. Heck, there was no "prostitution" in the USSR as that would force them to admit that the women of the night were employed not by the state, but by either themselves or their pimps.

A Socialist country is a country where the government or the public as a whole has control over the economy. In a socialist country, the producing and dispersing of goods is owned by the government. Socialism is placed in between capitalism and communism. By using your logic, Great Britain is communist, as is Finland, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, as there is no difference between a communist and a socialist state.

TSC
 

Last edited by referee54; Jan 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2010 | 11:19 PM
  #60  
wittom's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
From: Western Massachusetts
Originally Posted by referee54
Tom, the USSR was communist---other European countries are socialist; you supplied your own answer.

Communism is a kind of socialism....
Ok. Well, I guess I'll take your word for it?

Originally Posted by referee54
By using your logic
Well, it's not my logic, but I guess I'll take your word for it here too?
 

Last edited by wittom; Jan 14, 2010 at 11:24 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 PM.