Schumer Strikes Again
Schumer Strikes Again
I guess people aren't interested in Chuck U. Schumer.
This guy exemplifies the arrogance of the left. He is a jerk to the flight attendant and still his colleagues defend him. New Yorkers should be proud that he is their representative in the senate.
This guy exemplifies the arrogance of the left. He is a jerk to the flight attendant and still his colleagues defend him. New Yorkers should be proud that he is their representative in the senate.
Wow, that's even worse then those cons getting into illicit affairs, so much worse. Con-tradicting their own political beliefs it would seem.
Last edited by 4.6 Punisher; Dec 17, 2009 at 01:34 PM.
You would find it funny Raoul.
...And that Politico found it newsworthy.
...And that you can use the phone while the cabin door is open.
...And the whole airport Napolean complex mentality from the TSA gate guards all the way to the 'B____'.
...And that Schumer didn't have the stones to call her that it to her face.
...And what I find funny most of all is the constant parroting of these nonsensical events into your condensed twisted versions.
Last edited by Raoul; Dec 17, 2009 at 04:07 PM.
Trending Topics
What I find funny is the little rat republican aide who sat behind, running to Politico with the 'story'.
...And that Politico found it newsworthy.
...And that you can use the phone while the cabin door is open.
...And the whole airport Napolean complex mentality from the TSA gate guards all the way to the 'B____'.
...And that Schumer didn't have the stones to call her that it to her face.
...And what I find funny most of all is the constant parroting of these nonsensical events into your condensed twisted versions.
...And that Politico found it newsworthy.
...And that you can use the phone while the cabin door is open.
...And the whole airport Napolean complex mentality from the TSA gate guards all the way to the 'B____'.
...And that Schumer didn't have the stones to call her that it to her face.
...And what I find funny most of all is the constant parroting of these nonsensical events into your condensed twisted versions.

I "twisted" nothing. I guess quoting a story is fiction in your world Raoul.
I do not condone moral equivalency.
dems never have affairs? (well they do, we just don't here about it for weeks on end on the MSM like we do when a repub has one, example: Edwards) I am pretty sure dems don't belive in illicit affairs, contradicting their own political beliefs it would seem as well...
...and I also find your definition of 'quoting' funny.
A word here, a phrase there,...and make a sentence.
Of course the Dems have affairs. The top dem about 10 years ago had a nice entertaining one, but family values and borderline uncomfortable morals aren't their thing. Cons are always going on about family values. It just seems strange to me that members of the Grand Old Pity Party can't even follow by their own standards which they constantly criticize on the Dems. Your double standard.
Of course the Dems have affairs. The top dem about 10 years ago had a nice entertaining one, but family values and borderline uncomfortable morals aren't their thing. Cons are always going on about family values. It just seems strange to me that members of the Grand Old Pity Party can't even follow by their own standards which they constantly criticize on the Dems. Your double standard.
Not really a double standard, repubs have never claimed that the repub party is 100% mistake free 100% of the time. They, just like the dems, think they know whats the best direction for the country.
Schumer was an a-hole and he got called out for it, I fail to see the issue or how Schumer is a victim all the sudden. If a repub does the same thing tomorrow they should get called out too. And I'm sure they would and 100x harder.
If we were to do a head count, both parties have enough d-bags to fill a football stadium to capacity, maybe even enough to fill the huge one that Jerry Jones just built in Dallas.




