Why does the FBI need 20mm rifles?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 02:06 PM
  #16  
jmeyerholtz's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by NCSU_05_FX4
No kidding! That's a long way to compensate for gravity, wind, etc!

- NCSU
At that distance they even have to compensate for the curve of the earth.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 02:11 PM
  #17  
Klitch's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 5
From: Washington
They just need to make a big mess... I think some of us have seen the gib factor of the 50 cal... now just imagine how small of pieces they'll have to bring back for confirmation.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 03:20 PM
  #18  
Oxlander's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Marshall, Tx
Originally Posted by Labnerd
If somebody stole a tank in your town and went on a rampage, which do you think would be closer and get there quicker- the military or the FBI 20mm that maybe across the nation? Which entity would be more versed in handling a tank on the rampage- the military or the FBI? Did you know that the I in FBI means Investigation? So I ask again, why does the FBI NEED a weapon like this especially since the military is a phone call away?
Under federal law, the deployment of US military personnel (other than Coast Guard and National Guard) on American soil is prohibited. It is called The Posse Comitatus Act. It can be lifted under certain circumstances but only by direct authorization of the sitting U.S. President after gaining congressional approval.

Imagine how much damage that tank could be doing while Obama petitions the US congress to allow him to send in the Air Force.

The FBI by contrast operates 456 local offices each overseen by a Special Agent in Charge who is capable of making decisions autonomous of political figures like members of congress, President, or Governor.

Which would you rather have respond to a rapidly developing, ever changing, civilian endangering, situation? A highly trained, seasoned specialist or the President?

ox
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 03:48 PM
  #19  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by kingfish51
A 20mm is less than 1" in diameter. Now if you are talking 200mm, that is 8" in diameter and would definitely penetrate if an anti-tank round.

Armor on an M60 is over 4" (don't have the correct thickness right now, but certainly over 4") and when sloped, even thicker. Note that with sloped armor, the M1A2 is over 12" thick.
And what kind of fool shoots right at the armor on the tank?

Take out the treads, engine, weak armor parts, drivers compartment, ect. Even the .50BMG is used against tanks.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 03:55 PM
  #20  
USAFORD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Wookie
Nope, he just described the cannon that is mounted on the front of an A-10.
and if you have ever heard an A-10's cannon fire.. WOW.. thats all i can say..
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 04:28 PM
  #21  
Labnerd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,226
Likes: 42
From: So. Texas
Under federal law, the deployment of US military personnel (other than Coast Guard and National Guard) on American soil is prohibited. It is called The Posse Comitatus Act. It can be lifted under certain circumstances but only by direct authorization of the sitting U.S. President after gaining congressional approval.
Wrong! Bush repealed the Act before leaving office. The military is now free to act on you and I as the President dictates.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 04:41 PM
  #22  
shotgunz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 1
From: NC
Originally Posted by Labnerd
The FBI is buying 2- 20mm rifles.

I see no need for the FBI to ever have anything like this in their arsenal.
You're right. They should buy 50mm.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 04:42 PM
  #23  
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
Originally Posted by Super FX4
And what kind of fool shoots right at the armor on the tank?

Take out the treads, engine, weak armor parts, drivers compartment, ect. Even the .50BMG is used against tanks.
No the 50 (12.7mm) is used against APCs, which in many cases are aluminum armored. The best 50 cal round can penetrate 3/4" (about 17mm) of steel armor. The thinnest armor on the M60 is 55mm, or over 2" and that is at the rear. Then you have to get through things like the engine etc. The reason why something like the 30mm can destroy a tank is because it is using depleted uranium rounds from above where armor is thinner. A tank can not be thick armored all over, so it is thick where it needs to be. Front especially, sides not quite as thick. The front armor on the M60 is 7", meaning sloped it turns out to be 315mm thick. M1A2 and other modern tanks have different armor so thickness doesn't mean as much, although what it has means compared to other tanks it has much thicker armor equivalent.

Here is a link to a description of the best 50 cal AP round.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/slap.htm

A comparison between 50 cal, 20mm, and 30mm.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/slap.htm
 

Last edited by kingfish51; Dec 2, 2009 at 05:04 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 05:19 PM
  #24  
aPINCHbetter90's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Skaneateles, NY
Well I guess that I know next time on the news when they say a man was brought down by an FBI sniper but he could not be identified.. Ill know why.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 06:40 PM
  #25  
Super FX4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
From: Memphis
Originally Posted by kingfish51
No the 50 (12.7mm) is used against APCs, which in many cases are aluminum armored. The best 50 cal round can penetrate 3/4" (about 17mm) of steel armor. The thinnest armor on the M60 is 55mm, or over 2" and that is at the rear. Then you have to get through things like the engine etc. The reason why something like the 30mm can destroy a tank is because it is using depleted uranium rounds from above where armor is thinner. A tank can not be thick armored all over, so it is thick where it needs to be. Front especially, sides not quite as thick. The front armor on the M60 is 7", meaning sloped it turns out to be 315mm thick. M1A2 and other modern tanks have different armor so thickness doesn't mean as much, although what it has means compared to other tanks it has much thicker armor equivalent.

Here is a link to a description of the best 50 cal AP round.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/slap.htm

A comparison between 50 cal, 20mm, and 30mm.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/slap.htm
a .50bmg is still capable of stopping a tank with the right shooter and a 20mm is that much better

a tank is only as strong as the weakest part
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #26  
f150fella08's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,637
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburg, Texas
i wonder how many deer i could kill with one of those 20mm's......hmm..
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 07:24 PM
  #27  
BennyHanna's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Bismarck, ND
According to my publications the 20mm was developed by the soviets as a sniper rifle. It has been determined to be too big to be effective however and was eventually abandoned. Their main usage was in a permanent perch or guard tower in a heavily guarded installation. Basically it was a permanent or semi-permanent placement of the weapon. In addition it is far too large of a round to be consistently and repeatedly fired from the sholder. Even with the "suppressors" you mentioned it still is too much. It should also be noted those are not silencers, they are suppressors which will reduce the recoil and muzzle jump. Since a large portion of the noise generated from high power weapons comes from the sonic boom of breaking the speed of sound, it is impossible to silence them without loading down to a sub-sonic round. Further, by resorting to a sub-sonic round you lose not only speed and energy transfer to the target, you also experience a loss of accuracy which makes a sniper rifle pretty much pointless by then.

As a side note, I don't have the book here but one book talked extensively about sniper calibers said the longest confirmed kill was 1.54 miles with a 50 cal. The soviets claimed kills out over 2 miles with the 20mm but none were ever confirmed.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #28  
avfrog's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,172
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by 4.6 Punisher
X2

It could also be used to take out marine engines, like yachts or something.

It looks a lot like a beefier CheyTac Intervention.
x3
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 07:35 PM
  #29  
harleydude78's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: Crestview, FL
Originally Posted by Labnerd
Wrong! Bush repealed the Act before leaving office. The military is now free to act on you and I as the President dictates.
FYI (via wiki)

Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007" (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by President George W. Bush on October 17, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony. This act allows the President to declare a "public emergency," station troops anywhere in America, and take control of state-based National Guard units without consent of the governor or local authorities, to "suppress public disorder."


This was repealed in 2008 by HR 4986: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, reverting to the previous wording of the Insurrection Act.
 
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #30  
hwm3's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
From: Cary, NC
Originally Posted by 1st4x4
You're talking around $30k for two rifles. However, so you know, Winchester HV .22lr is 3600fps vs. this 20mm load at 3300. However, the range of the ammo is 3000 yards or nearly TWO miles. I wanna see the scope they mount on the ded gum thing
Where are you buying 3600fps .22lr rounds?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.