USC 13 Washington 16!!
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
well, if it were money that were at issue here, it would be that no one would want to watch two SEC teams, or any two teams from the same conference for that matter, play for the title. Don't have to worry about LSU being left out because they are going to lose at least one more game.
It happens every year, early losses are better than later losses, and this isn't just the case with USC, it happens across the board. so if you think this just happens to USC, open your eyes.
It happens every year, early losses are better than later losses, and this isn't just the case with USC, it happens across the board. so if you think this just happens to USC, open your eyes.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Oh, by the way, look at Viginia Tech. they are a 1 loss team ranked higher than USC, but they lost early in the season to a good team. they could walk backwards into the championship game if they don't have a lapse against Georgia Tech. Their only stumbling block might be strength of schedule
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
If it's about strenght of schedule then USC wouldn't be ranked. They lost to an unranked team. Washington has 2 wns this year... Ole Miss lost to South Carolina; another unranked team, and dropped to #20. Just an observation.
I still think USC will lose again and make it a moot point anyway. Time will tell.
I still think USC will lose again and make it a moot point anyway. Time will tell.
