searching?
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
Sometimes I'm amazed at how long it takes me to figure things out, must be my rapidly fading brain cells.
But, if you're still lost, all you have to do is SEARCH for "you"!
Except, of course you wouldn't actually type "you" you'd be looking for "me". And of course you know I'm not referring to ME, but to YOU (except that's not what you'd type)! Dang, it's getting more complicated than I thought, no wonder you're lost! 
I guess you shouldn't have gone "looking" in the first place.
Hope you show up somewhere soon!
- Jack
But, if you're still lost, all you have to do is SEARCH for "you"!
Except, of course you wouldn't actually type "you" you'd be looking for "me". And of course you know I'm not referring to ME, but to YOU (except that's not what you'd type)! Dang, it's getting more complicated than I thought, no wonder you're lost! I guess you shouldn't have gone "looking" in the first place.
Hope you show up somewhere soon!- Jack
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Now you're "dating" us both. I imagine there are many here that haven't a clue what you're talking about. It IS a bit like that, isn't it?
That has to have been one of the funniest comedy routines of all time.
- Jack
That has to have been one of the funniest comedy routines of all time.
- Jack
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 1
From: ohio
Sometimes I'm amazed at how long it takes me to figure things out, must be my rapidly fading brain cells.
But, if you're still lost, all you have to do is SEARCH for "you"! Except, of course you wouldn't actually type "you" you'd be looking for "me". And of course you know I'm not referring to ME, but to YOU (except that's not what you'd type)! Dang, it's getting more complicated than I thought, no wonder you're lost!
I guess you shouldn't have gone "looking" in the first place. Hope you show up somewhere soon!
- Jack
But, if you're still lost, all you have to do is SEARCH for "you"!
Except, of course you wouldn't actually type "you" you'd be looking for "me". And of course you know I'm not referring to ME, but to YOU (except that's not what you'd type)! Dang, it's getting more complicated than I thought, no wonder you're lost! I guess you shouldn't have gone "looking" in the first place.
Hope you show up somewhere soon!- Jack
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,887
Likes: 61
From: Among javelinas and scorpions in Zoniestan
Oh don't do that! Since I'm not lost, like you, you'll probably crash the entire web. I really think it would be better to just type "me", I mean "you", as in "me" from your point of view, not mine, since "me" for "me" is not "you".... 
- Jack
- Jack
Thread Starter
|
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 1
From: ohio
Technical Article Contributor
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 10,511
Likes: 10
From: Under the flightpath of old ORD 22R
I said nice gams the other day, and the person I said it to, had no clue what I was talking about.
Firefox has no clue how to spell that either, thought I meant hams.
Same as that conversation a few weeks back about thongs; as in the plastic sandals you wear on your feet. Ben Franklin stores had them for 0.89 a pair. I know, theya re not called that anymore, they are flip flops now ( too old for new names of the same old thing )
You are correct, that is one of the best routines of all time.
Last edited by SSCULLY; Sep 15, 2009 at 11:20 PM. Reason: spelling is not why I got the job.
