My Chicago Bears....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 03:33 PM
  #31  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
So now both the Broncos and the Bears will suck a little bit more.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 03:39 PM
  #32  
Jditta's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,814
Likes: 0
From: Northern Louisiana
Originally Posted by ddellwo
Don't worry -- the Bears will find a way to hose this up somehow......

Actually, in watching the Bears late last season, their defense just looked old and slow to me........

I was hoping my Vikings would have picked up Cutler -- he would have been a nice addition to the ol' Purple!
Some retard on a saints message board said he wished the saints would trade for cutler and b. marshall in exchange for drew brees, lance moore, AND a saints fourth round pick I never laughed so hard in my life.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 04:00 PM
  #33  
MDK's Avatar
MDK
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
[QUOTE=ddellwo;3667407]Actually, in watching the Bears late last season, their defense just looked old and slow to me........QUOTE]

That's because the Bears defense has been on the field 90% of the time for the past million seasons. it's called morale! If your offense doesn't score it doesn't make the defense any happier.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 06:45 PM
  #34  
sylentbutvylent's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Lockport, Illinois
Now, listen up Jerry Angelo:
You are 28 million under the cap with Cutler
The Arizona Cardinals have a **** secondary except Rodgers Cromartie

Send Nathan Vasher, 2009 2nd round pick, and 5th round pick
to get a target for Cutler to throw to in
ANQUAN BOLDIN
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 06:51 PM
  #35  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Boldin is a beast. He would make any team better.

The Cards have the best receiving corps in the NFL. I don't think they'll let him go cheap.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 09:23 PM
  #36  
Ftruck05's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Algonquin Il
I can't believe this. 3 pages of posts and no mention of the Bears signing Orlando Pace???? 3yrs 8mil. Don't even try an say he's overrated......Stealth, are you jealous cause the skins didn't score Cutler??? Chicago has got a couple good receivers. I see you also failed to mention our bad *** tightend Greg Olsen.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #37  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
The Skins have a good QB already.

I already mentioned Olson is the best receiver the bears have. You read back much?
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 10:24 PM
  #38  
sylentbutvylent's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Lockport, Illinois
Cambell's not as good as Orton though right Stealth?

Orton's at "Top tier QB".............lol
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 10:34 PM
  #39  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Campbell is better than Orton, but Orton is still top tier. IMO Campbell has more potential, given the number of offensive coordinators he's had in college and the NFL. He's persevered through that struggle where others would have been long gone.

If the Bears hadn't wasted their time on Rex Grossman the single handed Superbpwl loser Orton would have developed sooner, and he'd be even better than he is now, and the Bears wouldn't have had to waste their very important draft picks on Cutler.
 
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2009 | 11:02 PM
  #40  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Orton blows. He is just like JP Losman in both physical appearance and QB abilities.
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 08:31 AM
  #41  
MDK's Avatar
MDK
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
I've been reading a few articles about this trade. Rick Smith from the Chicago Tribune completely hates this kid it sounds like, calling him a baby and trying to compare his interception ratings. Then some guy from ESPN was just rambling about how we gave up to much and seemed to compare the Redskins QB with Cutler over and over. Saying he parties a lot. That guy from the Tribune said we need better receivers before a QB. I say guess what there a** clown, I don't care if you had a dozen Jerry Rice running the field, if you don't have a QB you don't have jack and Angelo feels that way too. About the interception issues, he thew over 600+ completions and had 18 interceptions, Orton threw 400+ and had 16...and guess who went to the Pro Bowl. Cutler sounds a little immature but Lovie Smith will keep him humble along with the other veterans. Either way he's better than Orton and better than Grossman whom by the way I can't seem to find listed on the Bears roster???
 
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2009 | 08:55 AM
  #42  
sylentbutvylent's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Lockport, Illinois
Thats because GROSSman is an unrestricted free agent....
 
Reply




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 AM.