In god we trust

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 05:36 AM
  #61  
momalle1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Shinesintx
I am an Idiot. An idiot for even speaking to a Liberal. Why? They have an agenda... You say concerning the Constitution:



The 2nd amendment CLEARLY states...
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

So what you are telling me is that the Founders intended for only the Military to have the right to bear arms? You actually think that they felt it necessary to make sure the Military did not lose that right?

Liberals want to interpret and change the intent of the Fathers. The "separation of church and state" was coined by the Libs. Under God is not condoning a any religion. Again, Liberal thought permeating and destroying this wonderful country.
Is everyone that disagrees with you a liberal? Honestly, is that the best you can do, name calling?

The intent of the clause is right there in black and white. Ignoring the facts doesn't change them.

Funny, you choose to ignore "A well regulated Militia" or that "the people" are referred to, not the individual. No, the intent was clearly that the military would not be the only ones to have arms, a direct reaction to the British marching to Concord to seize arms. It's apparent you are unfamiliar with the history of the time, or simply choose to ignore that which doesn't fit your agenda.

That said, it's a bit outdated as nothing you could own would match the military and there should be an amendment guaranteeing law abiding citizens can own guns.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 05:38 AM
  #62  
momalle1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by alomar
But it has been on our coins since the 1800's. Paper aint the only form of currency. Either way, the duration it has been on our currency is irrelevant.
Pretty sad we can have an official motto, but Congress refuses to vote on an official language.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 06:12 AM
  #63  
OgRedd's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 1
From: TN
Remove "In God We Trust'"? Why do we spend so much time on this type of crap? It worked for over 2000 years. Jeez, people. If you believe in God, paper money spends and if you don't, it still spends. (I believe, by the way.) Why don't we try to get rid of "until death do you part" in the marriage vows? Now that's a cause to rally behind. - Og
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 12:07 PM
  #64  
PKRWUD's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Ventura, California
Originally Posted by efuehrin
Democracy......Majority is supposed to rule!!!!!
Not in The United States of America.


Originally Posted by Zaairman
If you don't like it, get the hell out.
What part of the Bible taught you that Christian principle?

"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion..."
-From Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli 1797. Unanimously ratified by the U.S. Senate and signed by President John Adams.


Originally Posted by alomar
Voted no, if we keep changing everything America will not truely be America. Get rid of everything this country stands for and was found by and we will be....amerpakiraqafghanichinapanussia.
So you're saying that it was wrong to change things from they way they were originally by adding the words In God We Trust to our currency?


Originally Posted by F150DEER
this was not what was intended by our forefathers. if you recall your history lessons in medieval times and as late as our revolution the church was corrupt and controlled the government. that is what separation of church and state really means. that the church cannot run the government. It does not mean that- no saying prayer in school...
This is a common misconception. No where does it say that students can't say prayers in school. In fact, no where does it say that anyone can't pray on their own time.


Originally Posted by po1911
The fact remains that the founding fathers did give us the freedom of religion, not the freedom from religion.
The freedom of religion includes the freedom from religion, should one so desire.


Originally Posted by Shinesintx

Liberals want to interpret and change the intent of the Fathers. The "separation of church and state" was coined by the Libs. Under God is not condoning a any religion. Again, Liberal thought permeating and destroying this wonderful country.
Actually, Thomas Jefferson coined the term when he was trying to explain things to some Baptist leaders.


Originally Posted by momalle1
Pretty sad we can have an official motto, but Congress refuses to vote on an official language.
Actually, when this country was founded, our motto was "E Pluribus Unum." It was almost 100 years later before a minister convinced the Secretary of the Treasury to try and get 'In God We Trust' on our coins. It was never a part of our true heritage.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #65  
Shinesintx's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,234
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas Tx
Originally Posted by momalle1
Is everyone that disagrees with you a liberal? Honestly, is that the best you can do, name calling?

The intent of the clause is right there in black and white. Ignoring the facts doesn't change them.

Funny, you choose to ignore "A well regulated Militia" or that "the people" are referred to, not the individual. No, the intent was clearly that the military would not be the only ones to have arms, a direct reaction to the British marching to Concord to seize arms. It's apparent you are unfamiliar with the history of the time, or simply choose to ignore that which doesn't fit your agenda.

That said, it's a bit outdated as nothing you could own would match the military and there should be an amendment guaranteeing law abiding citizens can own guns.
WTF? The people are the individuals... And yes I called a spade a spade. The cat that I called a Liberal, is a Liberal. And NO ****, the intent was clear that individuals have a right to bear arms. Next time please read further, and not crawl up someone *** you really agree with, but fail to see the content.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #66  
PONY_DRIVER's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: VA
It is sad to see how many people fail to understand what was meant my "separation of Church and State".
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #67  
Norm's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
From: Seabrook,NH
Originally Posted by PONY_DRIVER
It is sad to see how many people fail to understand what was meant my "separation of Church and State".
True.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #68  
PONY_DRIVER's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by PKRWUD
?

"As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion..."
-From Article 11 of the Treaty of Tripoli 1797. Unanimously ratified by the U.S. Senate and signed by President John Adams.

The URLs are telling when that phrase is googled.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 01:08 PM
  #69  
momalle1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Shinesintx
WTF? The people are the individuals... And yes I called a spade a spade. The cat that I called a Liberal, is a Liberal. And NO ****, the intent was clear that individuals have a right to bear arms. Next time please read further, and not crawl up someone *** you really agree with, but fail to see the content.

"The people" is a collective.

The "cat" I was referring to was me as in your response. If you didn't intend to call me a liberal, I don't know why you brought it up in response to my comments.

I showed you the basis for the freedom of religion clause, and also showed you the background for the right to bear arms clause, show me something different to back up your claim. Again, I clearly stated I believe every law-abiding citizen should be allowed to own guns, I just don't think that's what the clause says.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #70  
momalle1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by PKRWUD
Actually, when this country was founded, our motto was "E Pluribus Unum." It was almost 100 years later before a minister convinced the Secretary of the Treasury to try and get 'In God We Trust' on our coins. It was never a part of our true heritage.
Yes, I'm aware of this. It's interesting that Congress is not allowed to make any law favoring one religion but it is they that make this decision. Is a decision about what get's written on money a law technically?
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 01:11 PM
  #71  
PONY_DRIVER's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: VA
Originally Posted by momalle1
Yes, I'm aware of this. It's interesting that Congress is not allowed to make any law favoring one religion but it is they that make this decision. Is a decision about what get's written on money a law technically?
No, it is not.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #72  
PONY_DRIVER's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: VA
BTW, here's a transcript of the letter Jefferson wrote to the Danbury Baptists.


To messers. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson, a committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.
Gentlemen

The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.

Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.

Th Jefferson
Jan. 1. 1802.



The 1st amendment prevented Congres from creating, or establishing an official Church, and prevented any Church from getting Congress to give or show them favor. That's it.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 01:46 PM
  #73  
Oxlander's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Marshall, Tx
Originally Posted by PONY_DRIVER
No, it is not.
Wrong.

In God We Trust
A law passed by the 84th Congress (P.L. 84-140) and approved by the President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 11, 1955. It said that the motto "In God We Trust" should appear on all United States paper currency and coins. This law provides that:

At such time as new dies for the printing of currency are adopted in connection with the current program of the Treasury Department to increase the capacity of presses utilized by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, the dies shall bear, at such place or places thereon as the Secretary of the Treasury may determine to be appropriate, the inscription IN GOD WE TRUST, and thereafter this inscription shall appear on all United States currency and coins.
On July 30, 1956, the President approved a Joint Resolution of the 84th Congress, declaring IN GOD WE TRUST the national motto of the United States. IN GOD WE TRUST was first used on paper money in 1957, when it appeared on the one-dollar silver certificate. The first paper currency bearing the motto entered circulation on October 1, 1957.
http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fac...-we-trust.html
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 01:50 PM
  #74  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by Oxlander
Wrong.

In God We Trust
A law passed by the 84th Congress (P.L. 84-140) and approved by the President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 11, 1955. It said that the motto "In God We Trust" should appear on all United States paper currency and coins. This law provides that:

Quote:
At such time as new dies for the printing of currency are adopted in connection with the current program of the Treasury Department to increase the capacity of presses utilized by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, the dies shall bear, at such place or places thereon as the Secretary of the Treasury may determine to be appropriate, the inscription IN GOD WE TRUST, and thereafter this inscription shall appear on all United States currency and coins.
On July 30, 1956, the President approved a Joint Resolution of the 84th Congress, declaring IN GOD WE TRUST the national motto of the United States. IN GOD WE TRUST was first used on paper money in 1957, when it appeared on the one-dollar silver certificate. The first paper currency bearing the motto entered circulation on October 1, 1957.
http://www.ustreas.gov/education/fac...-we-trust.html
Johnson was president from November 22, 1963 – January 20, 1969.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 02:06 PM
  #75  
Oxlander's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: Marshall, Tx
Originally Posted by Stealth
Johnson was president from November 22, 1963 – January 20, 1969.
Right you are. I meant to say that on July 11, 1955, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed Public Law 140 making it mandatory that all coinage and paper currency display the motto.

It was Lyndon Baines Johnson (D-TX) who introduced the bill as Calendar No. 642, H.R. 619
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 PM.