Need (2) 22" LCD *GAMING* Monitors...

Old May 15, 2008 | 12:25 AM
  #16  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
I agree. I'm upgrading everything else before I spend the money on the computer though.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 02:04 AM
  #17  
styxnpicks's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,700
Likes: 0
From: my apartment
Originally Posted by ThumperMX113
I agree. I'm upgrading everything else before I spend the money on the computer though.
your rig is only as good as its weakest link.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 02:21 AM
  #18  
Lumadar's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by styxnpicks
lumadar your computer is the weak point, not your vid card. yous should consider upgrading to a core2duo rig
I figured. I've squeezed a solid 3 years out of this puppy...not bad I guess.

I'm going to wait until I get the actual dual monitor setup and upgrade the rest of the rig then, for now it works.

As for everyone suggesting needing a better card for dual monitors and gaming, I actually only play the occasional WoW and other out-dated games like DoTa. I want the 2 monitors so I can run something low graphics intensive like a browser on the second monitor, and only game on one. I think my card should be able to handle that.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 06:33 AM
  #19  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
DELL and HP have the best LCD flat screen monitors out there. I would go with dell. HPs gloss screen monitors look fantastic but they have real thick frames and wouldnt work well with dual setup. Tiger direct had the 22" HP for $250 last week.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 08:39 AM
  #20  
Pheonixx's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo, NY
if you dont mind the price you can get an awesome monitor here

http://www.iz3d.com/
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 10:55 AM
  #21  
Lumadar's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by JBMX928
DELL and HP have the best LCD flat screen monitors out there. I would go with dell. HPs gloss screen monitors look fantastic but they have real thick frames and wouldnt work well with dual setup. Tiger direct had the 22" HP for $250 last week.
To be honest I haven't researched in a while, but last time I did I found the biggest issue with Dell is that they use a lottery system for their monitors. You truly never know what you're going to get, or not. It's too risky IMO. Other manufacturers are guilty as well, so I am going to do some solid research and make sure the model I get truly is what it is advertised as.

I'll look into the HP though...
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 11:01 AM
  #22  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
Even today's cheap LCD's are much better gamers than the top line ones not that long ago. You don't need an advertised 2ms.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #23  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
I've heard the Samsung along with the HPs are great screens. Dell I haven't heard so much, from the problems I've had with the computers at my office, I wouldn't buy another Dell product.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 03:01 PM
  #24  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Dell's ultrasharp LCDs cant be matched IMO. Their screens are perfect. Not too thick of a frame. Easy to navigate menus and buttons on the monitor. Sleek looking stand with multiple axis to move. The monitor will turn on its side so you can access all the different types of ports such as AV, USB, S-VIDEO, dvi, vga and others . The thing also elevates/de-elevates and rotates.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 03:05 PM
  #25  
Lumadar's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by JBMX928
Dell's ultrasharp LCDs cant be matched IMO. Their screens are perfect. Not too thick of a frame. Easy to navigate menus and buttons on the monitor. Sleek looking stand with multiple axis to move. The monitor will turn on its side so you can access all the different types of ports such as AV, USB, S-VIDEO, dvi, vga and others . The thing also elevates/de-elevates and rotates.
Although all that stuff is cool, none of it is on my top priority list. Don't get me wrong, I love a sleek and functional housing on a product as much as the next guy, but to me I am looking for the bells and whistles to be found in the color, brightness, contrast, refresh rates, resolutions, etc.

I want PERFORMANCE baby!
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #26  
glc's Avatar
glc
Senior Member
15 Year Member
Veteran: Navy
Veteran: Reserves
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43,542
Likes: 819
From: Joplin MO
I dunno how it is these days, but all Dell LCD's used to be made by Samsung.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 03:42 PM
  #27  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Originally Posted by Lumadar
Although all that stuff is cool, none of it is on my top priority list. Don't get me wrong, I love a sleek and functional housing on a product as much as the next guy, but to me I am looking for the bells and whistles to be found in the color, brightness, contrast, refresh rates, resolutions, etc.

I want PERFORMANCE baby!
Well yeah it has all that too. What i meant by "the screen is perfect" is that the image on this monitor is amazing. The "ultrasharp" models are the higher end dells with an even nicer picture than the regular ones.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #28  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by glc
I dunno how it is these days, but all Dell LCD's used to be made by Samsung.
That's funny.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #29  
Arca_ex's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
From: Gilbert, AZ
Originally Posted by ThumperMX113
Arca where is the cheapest place to buy those monitors from?
I got them from NewEgg awhile back for $340 each. They're probably a lot cheaper now.

Originally Posted by Lumadar
That's what I will do then. Although, I must say in WoW I do get noticable FPS droppage nearing major cities or large groups of players. Not horrible, but I notice it. Mind you, I don't even have everything maxxed out either.

Think my computer is the weak point? P4 3.4 HT and 2 gigs of 675 HZ RAM.
1. That's WoW. It's probably not your computer, it's their servers and the way their bloated software works. Don't even get me started on that game... Blizzard can suck a d***. WC3 is where I stopped.

2. Yes absolutely. That's a gigantic bottleneck, your CPU and RAM are limiting your GPU big time. BUT, if you're just running that game and nothing really more intense than you shouldn't need to upgrade. Some more RAM might help out with your lag issue if it's being overloaded.

Originally Posted by mSaLL150
Try running crysis in dx10 just on medium graphics with both 22" monitors...that gpu will **** itself. My 8800GTX struggles with just a single 20" monitor on very high graphics. (my comp puts up 13k+ on 3Dmark06)

In dx9 on other games you'd probably be okay though. Lumador if you are using windows XP you'll be fine with a single card. But if you do switch to Vista, you WILL want another card with 2 monitors.

PS i love NewEgg. always get my computer stuff from them.
Actually it would probably **** on you . 8800GTX's aren't even comparable to 8800GTS's that have the G92 architecture. Plus the overclocking on these things is insane. I run mine at 800MHz Core, 1800MHz Shader, and 2000MHz Memory as a daily overclock. With the fan cranked up a bit on the stock cooler this thing never sees over 65C even in the most intense games.

Oh, and I get around 17-18k in 3D06. Quad Core QX9650 Engineering Sample at 4.0GHz seems to help a bit...


Originally Posted by styxnpicks
lumadar your computer is the weak point, not your vid card. yous should consider upgrading to a core2duo rig
Agreed.

Originally Posted by styxnpicks
your rig is only as good as its weakest link.
Not completely agreed. Parts of a computer don't rely THAT heavily on each other. An example is if you have a really old and slow hard drive. That's not going to negatively affect the way that your graphics card puts video on the screen. Or if a computer has a really crappy sound card. That doesn't necessarily make that computer suck.

But yes, certain parts do sometimes rely heavily on other parts. Not all the time though.
 
Reply
Old May 15, 2008 | 11:42 PM
  #30  
styxnpicks's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,700
Likes: 0
From: my apartment
Originally Posted by Arca_ex
I got them from NewEgg awhile back for $340 each. They're probably a lot cheaper now.



1. That's WoW. It's probably not your computer, it's their servers and the way their bloated software works. Don't even get me started on that game... Blizzard can suck a d***. WC3 is where I stopped.

2. Yes absolutely. That's a gigantic bottleneck, your CPU and RAM are limiting your GPU big time. BUT, if you're just running that game and nothing really more intense than you shouldn't need to upgrade. Some more RAM might help out with your lag issue if it's being overloaded.



Actually it would probably **** on you . 8800GTX's aren't even comparable to 8800GTS's that have the G92 architecture. Plus the overclocking on these things is insane. I run mine at 800MHz Core, 1800MHz Shader, and 2000MHz Memory as a daily overclock. With the fan cranked up a bit on the stock cooler this thing never sees over 65C even in the most intense games.

Oh, and I get around 17-18k in 3D06. Quad Core QX9650 Engineering Sample at 4.0GHz seems to help a bit...




Agreed.



Not completely agreed. Parts of a computer don't rely THAT heavily on each other. An example is if you have a really old and slow hard drive. That's not going to negatively affect the way that your graphics card puts video on the screen. Or if a computer has a really crappy sound card. That doesn't necessarily make that computer suck.

But yes, certain parts do sometimes rely heavily on other parts. Not all the time though.


i dunno for gaming id take 2x250gb 7200rpm drives in raid0 over a single 20gb 5400rpm drive anyday
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.