Acceleration

Old Feb 6, 2008 | 08:46 AM
  #1  
mrpositraction's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Acceleration

I read this on another site and found it interesting.

* One Top Fuel dragster 500 cubic-inch Hemi engine makes more horsepower (8,000 HP) than the first 4 rows at the Daytona 500.

* Under full throttle, a dragster engine consumes 11.2 gallons of nitro methane per second; a fully loaded 747 consumes jet fuel at the same rate with 25% less energy being produced.

* A stock Dodge Hemi V8 engine cannot produce enough power to merely drive the dragster's supercharger.

* With 3,000 CFM of air being rammed in by the supercharger on overdrive, the fuel mixture is compressed into a near-solid form before ignition. Cylinders run on the verge of hydraulic lock at full throttle.

* At the stoichiometric 1.7:1 air/fuel mixture for nitro methane the flame front temperature measures 7,050 degrees F.

* Nitro methane burns yellow. The spectacular white flame seen above the stacks at night is raw burning hydrogen, dissociated from atmospheric water vapor by the searing exhaust gases

* Dual magnetos supply 44 amps to each spark plug. This is the output of an arc welder in each cylinder.

* Spark plug electrodes are totally consumed during a pass. After 1/2 way, the engine is dieseling from compression plus the glow of exhaust valves at 1400 degrees F. The engine can only be shut down by cutting the fuel flow.

* If spark momentarily fails early in the run, unburned nitro builds up in the affected cylinders and then explodes with sufficient force to blow cylinder heads off the block in pieces or split the block in half.

* Dragsters reach over 300 MPH before you have completed reading this sentence.

* In order to exceed 300 MPH in 4.5 seconds, dragsters must accelerate an average of over 4 G's. In order to reach 200 MPH well before half-track, the launch acceleration approaches 8 G's.

* Top Fuel engines turn approximately 540 revolutions from light to light!

* Including the burnout, the engine must only survive 900 revolutions under load.

* The redline is actually quite high at 9,500 RPM.

* THE BOTTOM LINE: Assuming all the equipment is paid off, the crew worked for free, and for once, NOTHING BLOWS UP, each run costs an estimated $1,000 per second.

0 to 100 MPH in .8 seconds (the first 60 feet of the run)

0 to 200 MPH in 2.2 seconds (the first 350 feet of the run)

6 g-forces at the starting line (nothing accelerates faster on land)

6 negative g-forces upon deployment of twin chutes at 300 MPH

An NHRA Top Fuel Dragster accelerates quicker than any other land vehicle on earth . . quicker than a jet fighter plane . . . quicker than the space shuttle. The current Top Fuel dragster elapsed time record is 4.420 seconds for the quarter-mile (2004, Doug Kalitta). The top speed record is 337.58 MPH as measured over the last 66' of the run (2005, Tony Schumacher).

Putting this all into perspective:

You are driving the average $140,000 Lingenfelter twin-turbo powered Corvette Z06. Over a mile up the road, a Top Fuel dragster is staged and ready to launch down a quarter-mile strip as you pass. You have the advantage of a flying start. You run the 'Vette hard up through the gears and blast across the starting line and pass the dragster at an honest 200 MPH. The 'tree' goes green for both of you at that moment. The dragster launches and starts after you. You keep your foot down hard, but you hear an incredibly brutal whine that sears your eardrums and within 3 seconds the dragster catches and passes you. He beats you to the finish line, a quarter-mile away from where you just passed him. Think about it - from a standing start, the dragster had spotted you 200 MPH and not only caught, but nearly blasted you off the road when he passed you within a mere 1,320 foot long race!

That's acceleration!
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 09:14 AM
  #2  
SAJEFFC's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio Tx
I saw that in a car magazine a while back also. Thats some pretty cool stuff!
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 09:19 AM
  #3  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by SAJEFFC
I saw that in a car magazine a while back also. Thats some pretty cool stuff!
You're trying to impress us, telling us you read magazines. We ain't buying it!
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 09:19 AM
  #4  
s2krn's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
I'd rather be in the vette when that turn pops up on the horizon!!!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 09:21 AM
  #5  
kingfish51's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,550
Likes: 2
From: Mount Airy,MD
I do not buy the one about the 747. At cruise, a 747 uses about 25% of it's thrust, or about 55,000lbs of thrust, which calculates out to 87,000hp.

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question...on/q0195.shtml
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 09:32 AM
  #6  
nvrenuff's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Airdrie, AB
just don't show that list to Al Gore
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 09:43 AM
  #7  
SAJEFFC's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio Tx
Originally Posted by bluejay432000
You're trying to impress us, telling us you read magazines. We ain't buying it!
Hey I read on the can all the time.
 
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 6, 2008 | 09:57 AM
  #8  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 82
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Originally Posted by SAJEFFC
Hey I read on the can all the time.
OOOOPS, my bad! I forgot about that!
 
__________________
Jim
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 10:50 AM
  #9  
nuclearthreat54's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: Broward County, FL
Thats cool!
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 03:21 PM
  #10  
jiggle's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
My Propulsion Systems instructor gave that to the class about a year ago. Very interesting.
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 04:46 PM
  #11  
chrism9232's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Kentucky
Originally Posted by mrpositraction
* Under full throttle, a dragster engine consumes 11.2 gallons of nitro methane per second; a fully loaded 747 consumes jet fuel at the same rate with 25% less energy being produced.
i thought my truck was hard on gas
 
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 06:22 PM
  #12  
ian51279's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 2
From: Decatur,AL
Drag racing is for people who can't drive.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 10:34 AM
  #13  
nvrenuff's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
From: Airdrie, AB
Originally Posted by ian51279
Drag racing is for people who can't drive.

so you suck at it is what your sayin
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #14  
mrpositraction's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MO
Originally Posted by nvrenuff
so you suck at it is what your sayin


That is what I read from it. I would like to see him drive that car down the track. Most likely blackout!
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #15  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Road racing and rally racing is much harder than driving a dragster. Sorry.

 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:04 AM.