what is all this 500 x 100 i see??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 12:50 PM
  #31  
kobiashi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 873
Likes: 1
From: Somewhere in the EU
Originally Posted by PSS-Mag
storage VS bandwidth and processors...
Lets do the math...

To handel[sic] storage
350 GB Hard Drive = $80-$100
That will take care of storage for atleast[sic] 6 months of[sic] not a year.
So about $100-$200 per year

to handel[sic] searches...
More bandwidth means adding an additional T line at $3K per month
and you will need faster processors every 6 months to keep up.
So new MB and Porcessors[sic] or all new servers every 6 months on top of adding T lines.
So about $36,000 per year for bandwidth and $500-$1000 per year for equipment.


I'm not a business genious[sic], but if it was my site, I'm pretty sure I'd much rather provide storage!
It seems to me that, assuming your argument is valid, that you neglect to apply the same bandwidth equation to the storage side of the equation . . .
For example, lets assume you keep adding storage - well, all that storage to handle all the repeat questions and answers . . . but the asking of all those questions over and over and the answers and insults thrown back, over and over, takes up an equal number of bandwidth if not more than would be required for the searches. Therefore, using your numbers, the only thing different is you added $500 - $1000 in storage. So Steve (oops, Internet Brands Worldwide Holdings LLC) would spend $500 - $1000 more your way.

Or not.

Let's just say it's a toss-up and continue insulting those who ask the same old question over and over.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 01:25 PM
  #32  
Speedy8's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
lol all this arguing over 50,000 pixels
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 01:32 PM
  #33  
PSS-Mag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 1
From: Lost some where in the middle of the Ozark Mountains!
Originally Posted by kobiashi
It seems to me that, assuming your argument is valid, that you neglect to apply the same bandwidth equation to the storage side of the equation . . .
For example, lets assume you keep adding storage - well, all that storage to handle all the repeat questions and answers . . . but the asking of all those questions over and over and the answers and insults thrown back, over and over, takes up an equal number of bandwidth if not more than would be required for the searches. Therefore, using your numbers, the only thing different is you added $500 - $1000 in storage. So Steve (oops, Internet Brands Worldwide Holdings LLC) would spend $500 - $1000 more your way.

Or not.

Let's just say it's a toss-up and continue insulting those who ask the same old question over and over.
The only time a thread uses bandwidth is when someone clicks on it to open it or post in it. The rest of the time it's just idel sitting on storage.
Looking at and posting put together is less than 1/8 of the resources used by a search.

Now the down side when you have multiple threads on the same subject, when you do a search it takes ALOT more bandwidth and system resources to perform the search and find all the threads with the key words. That jumbles up the searches.

I have a very slow internet connection, yet I could easily search attack any Vbulletin forum with a single computer and would be comparable to a well oganised and orchestrated multi user ping attack. You cant get enough people to open enough threads or post in threads fast enough to even casue a hicup.
 

Last edited by PSS-Mag; Aug 1, 2007 at 01:35 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #34  
vader716's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
From: Pikesville, MD
Originally Posted by CrAz3D
I thought it was 500x100?
Getting ready to make a smart comment and then I noticed the red....this is going to take some getting use to.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 01:40 PM
  #35  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by vader716
Getting ready to make a smart comment and then I noticed the red....this is going to take some getting use to.
Me too. .
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 01:42 PM
  #36  
PSS-Mag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 1
From: Lost some where in the middle of the Ozark Mountains!
Originally Posted by CrAz3D
I thought it was 500x100?

500 x 100 = 50,000

That is the square area of a 500x100 image.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 01:43 PM
  #37  
PSS-Mag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 1
From: Lost some where in the middle of the Ozark Mountains!
Originally Posted by vader716
Getting ready to make a smart comment and then I noticed the red....this is going to take some getting use to.


I dont get it, whats going to take some getting use to?
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 01:43 PM
  #38  
ThumperMX113's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,079
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by PSS-Mag
500 x 100 = 50,000

That is the square area of a 500x100 image.
Did you miss the memo?
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 01:44 PM
  #39  
PSS-Mag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 1
From: Lost some where in the middle of the Ozark Mountains!
Originally Posted by ThumperMX113
Did you miss the memo?
apparently I did.
Whats up?




The following errors occurred when this message was submitted:
This forum requires that you wait 60 seconds between posts. Please try again in 4 seconds.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #40  
PSS-Mag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 1
From: Lost some where in the middle of the Ozark Mountains!

Yea I missed that one.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 02:01 PM
  #41  
jamzwayne's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 1
From: Your moms house

dude......


Raoul knows JuJitsu
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 06:34 PM
  #42  
RED WING NUT's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
From: Detroit Rock City
Originally Posted by dzervit
...However, it started with a bunch of us old timers getting tired of people using 800x600 pictures with a 39 line parts list of mods for signatures...
^What he said.
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #43  
Bartak1's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,760
Likes: 4
From: Nebraska
Lol Red Wing
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 06:56 PM
  #44  
PSS-Mag's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 891
Likes: 1
From: Lost some where in the middle of the Ozark Mountains!
Originally Posted by PSS-Mag
You cant get enough people to open enough threads or post in threads fast enough to even cause a hicup.

I need to retract this statemnt, I don't know if it is still possiable, but a few years ago, there use to be a forum on the net that everyone was scared of. If they got mad at another online forum they would attack and overload the server with post until it crashed.

D you've got a good memory, who was that?
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 07:16 PM
  #45  
JBMX928's Avatar
Graphics Contributor
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,367
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo NY
Originally Posted by PSS-Mag
I need to retract this statemnt, I don't know if it is still possiable, but a few years ago, there use to be a forum on the net that everyone was scared of. If they got mad at another online forum they would attack and overload the server with post until it crashed.

D you've got a good memory, who was that?

Hah, a forum i used to go to that was on a bad forum engine had a weird quote system, and i remember quoting about 500 times and just copy and pasting a bunch of html i nthis forum.
and i made it so messed up that when youd go to the part of the message board that the post was in, all youd get was a white blank page
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:30 PM.