Can you tell me sir, what is was I said that caused you to come to this conclusion? Was it an inferance?

You know that Al-Qaeda wasn't in Iraq before we were? How do you know this?

 

Although I was born in Canada and serve in the Canadian military, I have ties in the US as my Grandfather was born there and I have a sister who lives there now.

The war on terrorism isn't all about the US as terrorists have hit many other countries in the world. The US took the initiative to quell the terrorist threat to the rest of the world and it's a good thing they did or there would have been many more strikes of a larger magnitude.

To pull out of either Iraq or Afghanistan right now would prove to the terrorist cells that the western nation is admitting defeat. Many of the terrorist cells are comprised of persons other than Iraqis and Afghans, there are many different nationalities making up their ranks and the local people don't want them there any more than the soldiers do...

Be proud of whatever nation you serve and hold your head up.

 

Uh, 9/11 Report maybe??

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Jun16.html

There is "no credible evidence" that Saddam Hussein's government in Iraq collaborated with the al Qaeda terrorist network on any attacks on the United States, according to a new staff report released this morning by the commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Although Osama bin Laden briefly explored the idea of forging ties with Iraq in the mid-1990s, the terrorist leader was hostile to Hussein's secular government, and Iraq never responded to requests for help in providing training camps or weapons, the panel found in the first of two reports issued today.

I guess Fox News never reported this?

 

You actually believe a government report?

 

I typically believe the ones that say things the Government DOESN'T really want to say....

 

Who's to say the 9/11 commision didn't have bad intelligence in their report as well?

 

Good point. People want to point out details like this report, and in the next breath demand that we impeach Bush for lieing about Iraq. So the information is correct when it supports a claim, yet is wrong if it's been used by Bush? That make sense.


You sir, should perhaps pay more attention to the details as well. Though I did leave a type-o, you didn't answer the question I was asking:

I've fixed the type-o, now can you answer my question?

There was another question in that post. Care to answer that one also?

 

I'm sorry, do you guys have a Better Report that Supports the claim Al Quada Was in Iraq before 9/11?? A Bi-Partisan Commisioned report would be best...

As always, Any Hard data that doesn't support your conspiracy theories "has" to be wrong...

So it sounds like you Agree that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.... I wish Bush would stop trying to tie them together.

his speech at the Naval War College on June 28, he has been telling an outright lie in Cleveland: "The same people that attacked us on September the 11th is the crowd that is now bombing people, killing innocent men, women and children, many of whom are Muslims, trying to stop the advance of a system based upon liberty."

The group doing the most spectacular bombings in Iraq was named al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia by its founder, Abu Mousab al-Zarqawi, now deceased, in an attempt to aggrandize his reputation in jihadi-world. It is a sliver group, representing no more than 5% of the Sunni insurgency. It shares a philosophy, but not much else, with the real al-Qaeda, which operates out of Pakistan. In fact, al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia has been criticized in the past by the operational director of the real al-Qaeda, Ayman al-Zawahiri, for its wanton carnage directed at Muslims. Bush's lie, which assumes a lack of knowledge on the part of the American people

 

You are the one that thinks people believe that Iraq had something to do with 9/11/01. I don't recall anyone ever saying that Iraq did. You have chosen to fill in blanks that don't necessarily exist. There were comments about Iraq and the attacks on 9/11/01, but not that Iraq was a part of the attacks.

You hear what you want to hear. That's all going to help out when the pacifists in this country surrender to terrorists and we are terrorized here at home, similarly to how it went on 9/11/01.

The pacifists are so intent on bringing down a sitting president during war time that our safety is an after thought. I think it's a bit short sighted, but like I said earlier, if I'm right, I probably wont have the oppotunity to say I told you so. I don't understand why people can't focus on surpressing terrorists, all over the world which includes Iraq, and go on your which hunt fishing expedition on your own time. Don't risk my life so you can make your stories come true.

If you're going to paste what someone else said, it would be helpful if you could post a link to where you found your information. Just because someone said something, it doesn't make it relevent.