I hope Ford is taking Toyota and the '07 Tundra seriously.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-09-2007, 10:56 PM
Tbird69's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope Ford is taking Toyota and the '07 Tundra seriously.

Ford better have some big plans to keep F-series on top. Toyota is ramping up their truck line for '07 with plans to introduce a heavy duty line in the near future. Check this gallery for the '07 Tundra crew cab.
I believe the 5.4 is now the smallest optional engine choice in the full size truck market.

http://www.netcarshow.com/toyota/2007-tundra_crewmax/
 
  #2  
Old 01-09-2007, 11:02 PM
lrhogfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is a pretty good looking truck.
 
  #3  
Old 01-09-2007, 11:26 PM
Quintin's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Georgia on my mind...
Posts: 6,509
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
It'll all even out whenever the 6.2 and the diesel comes online.

Competition improves the breed.
 
  #4  
Old 01-10-2007, 12:02 AM
Tbird69's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Quintin
It'll all even out whenever the 6.2 and the diesel comes online.

Competition improves the breed.
Agreed, but Ford should have this stuff available already, or at least be advertising it's future availability. Toyota's 5.7 puts the Dodge Hemi to shame with 381 HP and 401 lb ft of torque plus a 6 speed auto.
 
  #5  
Old 01-10-2007, 03:56 AM
Josiah's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 6,494
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tbird69
Agreed, but Ford should have this stuff available already, or at least be advertising it's future availability. Toyota's 5.7 puts the Dodge Hemi to shame with 381 HP and 401 lb ft of torque plus a 6 speed auto.
I love test driving. I hate salesmen. I'll def put up with those naggers to drive that ;D Looks like poo but probably pulls like a rock.
 
  #6  
Old 01-10-2007, 05:17 AM
Lumadar's Avatar
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Anyone notice how high the RPMs are for those power ratings? Like a damn Honda Civic. DEFINITELY NOT a truck friendly rating... low RPM numbers would be interesting to see.
 
  #7  
Old 01-10-2007, 07:51 AM
Marc Carpenter's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Posts: 2,803
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The 5.7 is a 10.2:1 compression rated engine and making good power on 87 octane fuel. With that in mind, consider the untapped power that is still available in this engine if tuned to run on 93 octane.!!!!!!! And yes there is a Company working on a tuner for this vehicle...
 
  #8  
Old 01-10-2007, 09:46 AM
Thad's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you go to Toyota .com and check out this trucks features they will be hard to beat. If you are a contractor it is made for you. I would bet it will be 10 grand more than a Ford though.
 
  #9  
Old 01-10-2007, 09:49 AM
Bighersh's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lumadar
Anyone notice how high the RPMs are for those power ratings? Like a damn Honda Civic. DEFINITELY NOT a truck friendly rating... low RPM numbers would be interesting to see.
600 RPM for 81 more HP... Doesn't sound like much of a sacrifice.. And, at 150 less revolutions, the 'Yota is making 36 more lb.ft. of torque... That's what really makes a difference where trucks are concerned. We'll have to wait and see how soon in the RPM band the majority of the torque is available. I think Ford has 90% of peak torque (328.5 lb/ft.) available at 1,800 RPM.

If that's the industry benchmark, I'm sure Toyota will get close to that, or may even exceed it, seeing that their maximum tow rating (when properly equipped) is nearly 800 lbs more.

Change is a good thing, we must learn to embrace it!


Note: Ford will never match that HP rating... Not until 2011 at the earliest
But, what Ford will do is match or exceed the torque rating, and state that is the true measure of a truck... They're only 36 lb/ft from that now- with no changes.

I wouldn't hold my breath for a diesel to match wits in HP or Torque with the big gassers for the following reasons.

1- Although typically more fuel efficient, diesel is (right now) more expensive than gas.

2- Slapping a diesel into a light-duty truck might be a first, but it may cannibalize Super Duty sales.

3- The PSD 6.0L is an industry benchmark on HP and Torque. To diffrentiate them, one should expect a smaller displacement in the LD, and no more then 80 - 90% of those peak numbers to keep the SD a viable alternative. (Or, the PSD would have to move up significantly to distance itself from a diesel in the LD line), I'd uesstimate a 5.0L PSD, with 260 - 290 HP, and 455 - 510 lb/ft.

Just guesses; but that's what I'd bet on... From a marketing standpoint, to keep from cutting into SD sales, they'd have to do this... Or, just say "eff it", and offer the 6.0L PSD as is across the entire F-series line, and let whatever happens, happen.
__________________________________________
5.7-liter DOHC EFI V8, 32-valve aluminum block with aluminum alloy head with Dual VVT-i
381 hp @ 5600 rpm
401 lb.-ft. @ 3600 rpm
Bore and stroke: 3.70 x 4.02
Compression ratio: 10.2:1
Displacement: 5663 cc
Ignition system: DIS (Direct)
Emissions: ULEV II
Recommended fuel: 87 octane or higher

Optional Engine
5.4L V8
Horsepower @ RPM
300@5000Torque @ RPM
365@3750 (foot/lbs)
 

Last edited by Bighersh; 01-10-2007 at 10:08 AM.
  #10  
Old 01-10-2007, 10:06 AM
vader716's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pikesville, MD
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford is taking is serious. They have been out in front with the 04 rebuild I'm sure they are ready for the Toyota. I think the truck looks decent but from what I see of the tail lights...yuck...

It will be well built I'm sure.
 
  #11  
Old 01-10-2007, 10:15 AM
SAJEFFC's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Antonio Tx
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I must say the stats on the Toyo are impressive. My hope is that Ford hurries the "alleged" Hurricane motor to production. It supposedly matches those hp and torque numbers. Ford also has a 10.5 inch ring gear axle in the heavy duty payload pkg F150, they need to put that in with the bigger motor also. I believe Ford has the hardware in the works to compete head to head with Toyota, its just a matter of getting it online!
 
  #12  
Old 01-10-2007, 11:58 AM
rsximus's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lumadar
Anyone notice how high the RPMs are for those power ratings? Like a damn Honda Civic. DEFINITELY NOT a truck friendly rating... low RPM numbers would be interesting to see.
umm.. I think not.
Looks like its making well over 300ft lbs @ 1200 rpms(thats almost right off idle), and 380ft lbs @ 2800, then peaking at 401 @ 3600...then never drops below 380ft lbs until 5300. Thats a VERY good torque curve, but the real kicker here is that it comes with a 6spd not a 4, so they can gear it to be much more powerful with an aggressive 1-4th, and a more relaxed 5th and 6th to still get 20mpg.

 

Last edited by rsximus; 01-10-2007 at 12:08 PM.
  #13  
Old 01-10-2007, 01:05 PM
Bighersh's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rsximus
umm.. I think not.
Looks like its making well over 300ft lbs @ 1200 rpms(thats almost right off idle), and 380ft lbs @ 2800, then peaking at 401 @ 3600...then never drops below 380ft lbs until 5300. Thats a VERY good torque curve, but the real kicker here is that it comes with a 6spd not a 4, so they can gear it to be much more powerful with an aggressive 1-4th, and a more relaxed 5th and 6th to still get 20mpg.

Impressive...

If Ford's numbers for the 5.4L are as I seem to remember (90% of avail torque at 1,800 RPM) That's 328.5 lb/ft @ 1,800 RPM's. I haven't been able to confirm that... But, looking at the chart provided, the Tundra looks like it's at 340 @ 1,600- Not quite 90%, but still more torque than everyone else.
 
  #14  
Old 01-10-2007, 04:32 PM
Dutch_Holland's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by Lumadar
Anyone notice how high the RPMs are for those power ratings? Like a damn Honda Civic. DEFINITELY NOT a truck friendly rating... low RPM numbers would be interesting to see.

401 lb.-ft of peak torque at 3,600 rpm. (2007 Tundra)

365 lb.-ft of peak torque at 3,750 rpm (2007 F150)
 
  #15  
Old 01-10-2007, 06:51 PM
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member


Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Burleson, Texas
Posts: 17,117
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I'll still take a ford truck over a toyota.
 


Quick Reply: I hope Ford is taking Toyota and the '07 Tundra seriously.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 AM.