I hope Ford is taking Toyota and the '07 Tundra seriously.
#1
I hope Ford is taking Toyota and the '07 Tundra seriously.
Ford better have some big plans to keep F-series on top. Toyota is ramping up their truck line for '07 with plans to introduce a heavy duty line in the near future. Check this gallery for the '07 Tundra crew cab.
I believe the 5.4 is now the smallest optional engine choice in the full size truck market.
http://www.netcarshow.com/toyota/2007-tundra_crewmax/
I believe the 5.4 is now the smallest optional engine choice in the full size truck market.
http://www.netcarshow.com/toyota/2007-tundra_crewmax/
#4
Originally Posted by Quintin
It'll all even out whenever the 6.2 and the diesel comes online.
Competition improves the breed.
Competition improves the breed.
#5
Originally Posted by Tbird69
Agreed, but Ford should have this stuff available already, or at least be advertising it's future availability. Toyota's 5.7 puts the Dodge Hemi to shame with 381 HP and 401 lb ft of torque plus a 6 speed auto.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Originally Posted by Lumadar
Anyone notice how high the RPMs are for those power ratings? Like a damn Honda Civic. DEFINITELY NOT a truck friendly rating... low RPM numbers would be interesting to see.
If that's the industry benchmark, I'm sure Toyota will get close to that, or may even exceed it, seeing that their maximum tow rating (when properly equipped) is nearly 800 lbs more.
Change is a good thing, we must learn to embrace it!
Note: Ford will never match that HP rating... Not until 2011 at the earliest
But, what Ford will do is match or exceed the torque rating, and state that is the true measure of a truck... They're only 36 lb/ft from that now- with no changes.
I wouldn't hold my breath for a diesel to match wits in HP or Torque with the big gassers for the following reasons.
1- Although typically more fuel efficient, diesel is (right now) more expensive than gas.
2- Slapping a diesel into a light-duty truck might be a first, but it may cannibalize Super Duty sales.
3- The PSD 6.0L is an industry benchmark on HP and Torque. To diffrentiate them, one should expect a smaller displacement in the LD, and no more then 80 - 90% of those peak numbers to keep the SD a viable alternative. (Or, the PSD would have to move up significantly to distance itself from a diesel in the LD line), I'd uesstimate a 5.0L PSD, with 260 - 290 HP, and 455 - 510 lb/ft.
Just guesses; but that's what I'd bet on... From a marketing standpoint, to keep from cutting into SD sales, they'd have to do this... Or, just say "eff it", and offer the 6.0L PSD as is across the entire F-series line, and let whatever happens, happen.
__________________________________________
5.7-liter DOHC EFI V8, 32-valve aluminum block with aluminum alloy head with Dual VVT-i
381 hp @ 5600 rpm
401 lb.-ft. @ 3600 rpm
Bore and stroke: 3.70 x 4.02
Compression ratio: 10.2:1
Displacement: 5663 cc
Ignition system: DIS (Direct)
Emissions: ULEV II
Recommended fuel: 87 octane or higher
Optional Engine
5.4L V8
Horsepower @ RPM
300@5000Torque @ RPM
365@3750 (foot/lbs)
Last edited by Bighersh; 01-10-2007 at 10:08 AM.
#10
#11
I must say the stats on the Toyo are impressive. My hope is that Ford hurries the "alleged" Hurricane motor to production. It supposedly matches those hp and torque numbers. Ford also has a 10.5 inch ring gear axle in the heavy duty payload pkg F150, they need to put that in with the bigger motor also. I believe Ford has the hardware in the works to compete head to head with Toyota, its just a matter of getting it online!
#12
Originally Posted by Lumadar
Anyone notice how high the RPMs are for those power ratings? Like a damn Honda Civic. DEFINITELY NOT a truck friendly rating... low RPM numbers would be interesting to see.
Looks like its making well over 300ft lbs @ 1200 rpms(thats almost right off idle), and 380ft lbs @ 2800, then peaking at 401 @ 3600...then never drops below 380ft lbs until 5300. Thats a VERY good torque curve, but the real kicker here is that it comes with a 6spd not a 4, so they can gear it to be much more powerful with an aggressive 1-4th, and a more relaxed 5th and 6th to still get 20mpg.
Last edited by rsximus; 01-10-2007 at 12:08 PM.
#13
Originally Posted by rsximus
umm.. I think not.
Looks like its making well over 300ft lbs @ 1200 rpms(thats almost right off idle), and 380ft lbs @ 2800, then peaking at 401 @ 3600...then never drops below 380ft lbs until 5300. Thats a VERY good torque curve, but the real kicker here is that it comes with a 6spd not a 4, so they can gear it to be much more powerful with an aggressive 1-4th, and a more relaxed 5th and 6th to still get 20mpg.
Looks like its making well over 300ft lbs @ 1200 rpms(thats almost right off idle), and 380ft lbs @ 2800, then peaking at 401 @ 3600...then never drops below 380ft lbs until 5300. Thats a VERY good torque curve, but the real kicker here is that it comes with a 6spd not a 4, so they can gear it to be much more powerful with an aggressive 1-4th, and a more relaxed 5th and 6th to still get 20mpg.
If Ford's numbers for the 5.4L are as I seem to remember (90% of avail torque at 1,800 RPM) That's 328.5 lb/ft @ 1,800 RPM's. I haven't been able to confirm that... But, looking at the chart provided, the Tundra looks like it's at 340 @ 1,600- Not quite 90%, but still more torque than everyone else.
#14
Originally Posted by Lumadar
Anyone notice how high the RPMs are for those power ratings? Like a damn Honda Civic. DEFINITELY NOT a truck friendly rating... low RPM numbers would be interesting to see.
401 lb.-ft of peak torque at 3,600 rpm. (2007 Tundra)
365 lb.-ft of peak torque at 3,750 rpm (2007 F150)