These F150's do not depreciate very well

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:28 AM
  #31  
buckdropper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: south western NYS Latitude: 42.34 N, Longitude: 78.46 W
Originally Posted by Lumadar
Back to the topic...

I find it hilarious that people are bitching about the low re-sale of the truck they stole from the dealer at THOUSANDS under invoice. What the hell did you think would happen?

I got my truck $9,000 UNDER sticker before tax and license. Did I expect to be able to go and sell it for just a few thousand under sticker within a year of buying it?

no, because I am not retarded. If I wanted to buy the truck for the ability to re-sell it in the short term and get nearly what I paid I would have purchased a Toyota AT STICKER and paid WAY WAY more than I did for my truck in the first place. And even then, you will still lose a few grand.

A truck/car is NOT a financial investment, (Don't tell me about gpas 65 stang, or other raritys, you know what I mean) it is a depreciating item (often a luxury item) and it is to be expected it will lose value as it wears out.

You people bitch about everything Ford does. Would you have been happy if Ford had made you buy the truck at sticker? Then you would have paid thousands of dollars more for the truck...cool! you can't have both high resale and fantastic discounts on brand new vehicles. Yet the same people bitching about low re-sale were not complaining when they got their truck thousands below invoice.

And if you actually paid sticker, hah, learn how to buy a car...
You are a worthless ****** idiot.........
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:44 AM
  #32  
ddellwo's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,823
Likes: 15
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by RED WING NUT
I pulled out my 3 1/2 year old paperwork to my daughters Focus. It was bought on the A-plan. The ONLY numbers on my purchase contract are :
A-plan selling price $16,099.56 (right off of invoice)
tax $965.97 (16,099.56 x .06)
Title & registration fee $12.00
license transfer fee $8.00

total of these four items= $17085.53

0% for 48 months

17085.53/48=355.94

My monthly payment to Ford Motor Credit is 355.94

So PLEASE tell me where this extra money I'm supposedly paying is hidden.

The Reality is I am paying ABSOLUTELY nothing to use Ford Credit's money for 4 years.
Not sure what "A Plan" pricing is, but for the VAST majority of people who purchase a vehicle with 0% financing, they had to give up X-thousands of dollars in rebates to get the sweet financing deal. Additionally, most dealers will give you a better "net price" on the vehicle if pass on the sweetheart financing deals from the manufacturer. Simply more room to play with if they're not having to offer "free money" with the deal.

Are there a few rare exceptions where 0% financing could work out as a good deal? Sure. But for the VAST majority of folks who use it, they unwittingly gave up thousands of dollars on the price side of the car to get the low percentage rate financing.

 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:46 AM
  #33  
Lumadar's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by buckdropper
You are a worthless ****** idiot.........
haha, way to make such a strong point and back it up with even stronger points. I would expect nothing less from you


As for "The Doctor"...

First off, like you said nothing I said was more than "abrasive" and yet you come out swinging. Calm down, no need to get your heart going because you realize how big of a mistake you made.

Now back to what you've said,
"MSRP on my truck was 41,300K. I bought it a year ago during the major sale, employee pricing. Got it for $33K. It has 17250 miles on it and is clean. Excellent condition. 2 tone paint, 4x4 S.crew. Spray in liner, Truxedo soft cover. Nada.com prices the retail value at 34,800 and trade in at $29.9K"

Ok, so let's get this straight. You got a truck for TEN THOUSAND dollars BELOW MSRP, drive it for a year and put above average mileage on it, and then when you find out NADA says it retails for within a few grand of what you paid you get angry?

For starters, if you are so brilliant at "buying cars" like you claim then you would know the only time worth trading a car/truck in to a dealer is when the thing is a lemon/POS and you know nobody in their right mind will buy it private party. If your truck is as nice as you claim it is, sell it private party and you won't have such a big problem on your hands.

"I didn't EXPECT to sell my truck a year later. When I bought it, gas was $2.25/gallon roughly. Now it is a minimum of $2.95 here and creeps to over $3.15 every week. That changes things for me."

Ok, so you didn't "expect" to have to sell it, yet you purchased a vehicle on a budget that was so tight that 25-30% increase in oil prices forces you to sell it? Especially since when prices were at $2.25 I KNOW it was very clear in the news that things were uncertain and prices could continue to rise. In fact, just about EVERYONE predicted prices to continue to rise and never return to sub $2 again. So basically your problem is that you purcahsed something BEYOND your means, and because of your poor financial planning you are upset at Ford?

You buy ANY vehicle and you will lose money when you drive it off a lot. It is no secret that Ford and chevy are the brands that take the biggest hit in that department because of deep discouning on year-end clearance, so you should have known from PAST years that resale would take a hit.

I didn't have to see into the future to know that buying my F150 would be a bad call *if* gas prices went up 20-50% and that selling it would be difficult. I just looked at past years and the current events. No magic ball needed...just common sense.

I hate to say it, but seriously, all I was pointing out was the fact that it was within your power as a normal human being without psychic abilities to plan ahead for potential problems such as an oil crisis. If you failed to take all possiblities into account, then that falls on your shoulders, NOT Ford's.

Or wait, maybe we should all call Ford and tell them not to let dealers back down more than 5% off of MSRP, and remove all incentives, and keep finance rates at 2.9% or higher. Then we can all be happy
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:01 AM
  #34  
Fx4man2004's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Texas
only cars that are investments are ultra high end exotics way ultra lol.

My father uses his A-plan price on any ford vehicle he buys and depending on the truck he can get 4 to 6 months out of it before it is around breaking even then he ditches it and gets a new one thereby miniminzing his loss and getting a new truck every time you turn around. Thats the only way i know of where you dont have to eat the depreciation.

Or you could lease it

fact is if you outright buy a car its gonna depreciate so dont worry about it. Drive it till the wheels fall off and it wont matter or lease it.

Youd be ultra pissed if you bought a jag thow they depreciate so damn fast or at least they use to.
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:46 AM
  #35  
buckdropper's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 918
Likes: 0
From: south western NYS Latitude: 42.34 N, Longitude: 78.46 W
Originally Posted by CrAz3D
...even if thats true, he's right about this.

Cars are not investments, they are just money pits...you're never going to come out on top when dealing with cars unless you're the dealership or look at the vehicle from another perspective.

I understand his point i would never buy a car/truck as an investment but the fact remains he a ****** idiot....
 

Last edited by buckdropper; Aug 1, 2006 at 05:18 AM.
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 03:19 AM
  #36  
Kool Aid's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN.
Originally Posted by doctorD
Absolutely love my Lariat but with gas prices and all the travel I do, I've been looking for either an additional car that gets better mpg, or selling the truck. But, that seems dismal.

MSRP on my truck was 41,300K. I bought it a year ago during the major sale, employee pricing. Got it for $33K. It has 17250 miles on it and is clean. Excellent condition. 2 tone paint, 4x4 S.crew. Spray in liner, Truxedo soft cover. Nada.com prices the retail value at 34,800 and trade in at $29.9K

I spoke with 4 Ford dealers today to ask how much they'd pay me for it. Auctions are heavy with trucks these days. My truck is worth $20-$22.5K to the dealer. That is a remarkable depreciation with supply=demand.

OK.....by these numbers you will lose around 13k if you trade it in.

What about the 13k loss?

Are you just going to write that off?

If you are willing to lose 13k, how can you complain about the price of gas?

How much gas can you buy with that 13k, over what it will cost to fuel another vehicle?

Taking a 13k loss to save a few mpg's is just plain foolish. I can't understand this type of thinking.

 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 04:28 AM
  #37  
Lumadar's Avatar
Suspended
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,622
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by buckdropper
I undersatnd his point i would never buy a car/truck as an investment but the fact remains he a ****** idiot....
Hey, we all at least we agree about something haha
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:07 PM
  #38  
Bighersh's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Damn-skippy I'm mad about the gas prices! Not mad at Ford, made at Wall Street, and Big Oil. But, I gas these three bastards up every week.

$71.00/week on the F-150
$60.00/ two weeks on the MDX
$40.00/ week on the Fusion.

Two or three years ago, those prices would've been:

$35.00/week
$30.00/bi-weekly
$20.00/week

What other widely purchased product increased in cost by 100+% over the last 2-3 years, and approaching 300% over the last 7 years? Energy... Something we've all grown accustomed to, and woudl find especially difficult to live without.
________
To have my fuel cost go from $420.00/month up to $564.00/month because of "worries" on Wall Street, is something I have been forced live with, (OR walk everywhere I go) but will never be happy about.
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:21 PM
  #39  
doctorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Lumadar
haha, way to make such a strong point and back it up with even stronger points. I would expect nothing less from you


As for "The Doctor"...

First off, like you said nothing I said was more than "abrasive" and yet you come out swinging. Calm down, no need to get your heart going because you realize how big of a mistake you made.
I'm not going to get into a pissing match with you. I didn't come out "swinging" you did by referring to ME and the rest as 'retarded.' I don't get into petty namecalling. I didn't make a "mistake." Please show me where I said I was 'angry' anywhere. I specifically used the term 'shocked.' I absolutely do not recall ever claiming to be "brilliant." I clearly stated that I was willing to walk away from a deal, leaving me in control. Paying above invoice on a car/truck with a markup such as that on a Ford truck Lariat is, IMO, a poor decision. You're worse than an angry woman, you seem to be good at spinning verbage. I have a few patients that work here locally at Ford. They have a SUBSTANTIAL markup on their higher dollar trucks. You keep referring to MSRP. That is a joke. Maybe you should do your homework. I never look at msrp and work down on a deal. I go from wholesale and work up. I guess this shows just how 'brilliant' you think you are.

The price of fuel alone is not the only source of my POSSIBLE sale of this truck. I comment on trade value, auction value, and private party through NADA simply because that is what MOST BANKS here use, NOT kbb. KBB is what several dealers use. I'm well aware of this. My situation stems from FAMILY needing my assistance. Which one year ago was not the case. It was UNFORSEEN. That is all I'll say about that as it is not your business. I cannot live my life constantly wondering about a dismal future and not purchase something based on that like you imply.

I find it very bold of you to deliver such a message that I live beyond my means and get upset at Ford. I'd like a quote where I mentioned being Upset at Ford. As for living beyond my means....I'm speechless. You have real *****.

Originally Posted by Lumadar
I hate to say it, but seriously, all I was pointing out was the fact that it was within your power as a normal human being without psychic abilities to plan ahead for potential problems such as an oil crisis. If you failed to take all possiblities into account, then that falls on your shoulders, NOT Ford's.
...all you were pointing out was calling me retarded, not living within my means, (a personal attack, with which you have no idea), repeatedly telling me I'm blaming Ford somehow and that I'm angry. I wasn't angry until you started chiming in with your attitude. There are other personal matters that have come about where I've been asked for financial assistance, and could not say no. For your sake, if you ever really need a "doctor" I hope they don't know what a hard heart you have.
 

Last edited by doctorD; Aug 1, 2006 at 12:28 PM.
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:23 PM
  #40  
Stealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Truck of the Month
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 17,118
Likes: 7
From: Burleson, Texas
Originally Posted by Bighersh
________
To have my fuel cost go from $420.00/month up to $564.00/month because of "worries" on Wall Street, is something I have been forced live with, (OR walk everywhere I go) but will never be happy about.
I think the rising cost of energy is creating a very wide gap between the haves and the have nots. Pretty ridiculous for the best country in the world. Pretty soon you're going to see people living on the open range like back in the 1800's because they can't afford anything. Call that economic progress?
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:35 PM
  #41  
doctorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Kool Aid
OK.....by these numbers you will lose around 13k if you trade it in.

What about the 13k loss?

Are you just going to write that off?

If you are willing to lose 13k, how can you complain about the price of gas?

How much gas can you buy with that 13k, over what it will cost to fuel another vehicle?

Taking a 13k loss to save a few mpg's is just plain foolish. I can't understand this type of thinking.

Never said I would trade it. Only commented on trade value to relay info. Is this common on these forums??? Everyone keeps thinking I'm going to trade this truck because I mentioned trade value. I clearly mentioned auction value and person to person value too. Yet no one has mentioned the latter. I think some of you assume to much. I will be more specific in the future.
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #42  
vader716's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,079
Likes: 0
From: Pikesville, MD
Doc let it go....that's Lumadar's MO. Don't get too worked up over it.

I happen to agree with his general premise (the depreciation isn't something to be surprised over) but not his method of communication.

He is young and brash. (Which by the way is no excuse)

Have one on me
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #43  
Bluejay's Avatar
Global Moderator &
Senior Member
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 26,080
Likes: 85
From: Burleson/Athens/Brownsboro, TX
Never ceases to amaze me how someone can post something of interest to them and it is like you stepped in someone else's stuff. Just no need for that kind of thing. You can disagree in a mannerly method and your point is the focus that a reader sees, instead of the crap you are throwing at someone.
 
__________________
Jim
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:50 PM
  #44  
doctorD's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by vader716
Doc let it go....that's Lumadar's MO. Don't get too worked up over it.

I happen to agree with his general premise (the depreciation isn't something to be surprised over) but not his method of communication.

He is young and brash. (Which by the way is no excuse)

Have one on me
I actually do not DISagree with Lumadars points. I just disagree strongly with his approach, and willingness to assume too much. What I don't care for is how I post an issue, concern, or whatever, and someone bastardizes the words used, convolutes, or distorts the message, and takes them out of context. As far as the loss of value, I guess it was surprising to me because a month ago, auctions here locally were at KBB or higher, and 30 days later the values have decreased substantially. Plus, I've not owned a Ford truck in years. My most recent truck was a Tundra and it held it's value very well.

Sometimes these forums are excellent, and for the most part informative in every fashion, however, now and then, they can turn sour. That was not the intent of my thread, just being informative regarding some personal accounts.

And FWIW, anyone thinking that doctors are rich, think again...student loans exceeding the 6 figure mark more than twice over, office staff, expenses, and on and on, add up. It's not the Mercedes 80s anymore with managed care. I wasn't around then. Doctor reimbursement has gone down every year for the past 7 years thanks to Medicare and all private party insurance following suit. YOUR copays, deductibles, and coinsurance have most certainly gone up annually. If not, I'm shocked again. If you want to talk to someone rich, call the head of Blue Cross/Blue Shield, he "earned" a 42 MILLION dollar BONUS in 2003.

In one sense, the medical profession did it to themselves by over-ordering unnecessary diagnostics, over prescribing, etc. But the way managed care has taken over, it is just the opposite extreme. Over 1800 physicians have filed suit against 4 major insurance companies locally. We've had hundreds of doctors leave the area because they think the grass is greener somewhere else. It won't go on forever on its current course. You cannot continue to give staff raises, pay rent, expenses and such when you are expected to spend 15-25 minutes with each patient and get $30. Any of you in business should know that.

by the way, what is "MO?"
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:50 PM
  #45  
APT's Avatar
APT
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,358
Likes: 1
From: Commerce Twp, MI
NADA is not a good place to look. Edmunds and KBB are more accurate for their Dealer trade and private party values. Edmunds comes up with a similar $22500 number depending on exact options. You have to consider that regardless of what you paid, someone got $12500 off MSRP a few months later for your exact truck. Then, real use decretiation and the continued discounts availible to all for new makes 1yr old vehicles less desireable.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 AM.