JSF renamed "Lightning II"
Originally Posted by F150Europe
Just read that the Joint Strike Fighters new name is Lightning II.
Officially renamed today in Texas.
Officially renamed today in Texas.
This was announced yesterday, as Lockheed announced the layoff of 130 workers at the Fort Worth plant, due to reduced orders of the F-16.
Now that the F-35 is out (If we're dumb enough to sell it), they can expect F-16 orders to dwindle significantly.
Here's the video:
http://www.nbc5i.com/news/9482037/de...s=dfw&psp=news
Personally: I think the Navy is being FORCED to take the F-35. Either that or the new twin seat Super-Hornet is going to take on the role of Air-Superiority and the F-35 pick up the current F-18's role as Fighter/Attack, of F/A-35.

The reason the navy took the "looser" of the F-16 vs F-17 (which became the F-18), is because the Navy didn't want a single-engined aircraft; no matter how good the F-16 is...
I'm surprised they haven't asked for/made plans to purchase (at least publicly) the F-22 Raptor or the F-23 (that lost to the F-22, barely), as a Tomcat replacement (again, unless the new 2-seat F-18's are going to) which is an already built, with little or no R&D dollars needed, design that's ready to go.

Oh well, the JSF looks like it will be a bad boy. While I think the F-22 beat the F-23 because it looked similiar to the F-15 (prettier); I'm glad pretty won agains the Boeing contender for the JSF... Sheesh! I wouldn't want our pilots flying anything that, well, ugly...
http://www.nbc5i.com/news/9482037/de...s=dfw&psp=news
Personally: I think the Navy is being FORCED to take the F-35. Either that or the new twin seat Super-Hornet is going to take on the role of Air-Superiority and the F-35 pick up the current F-18's role as Fighter/Attack, of F/A-35.

The reason the navy took the "looser" of the F-16 vs F-17 (which became the F-18), is because the Navy didn't want a single-engined aircraft; no matter how good the F-16 is...
I'm surprised they haven't asked for/made plans to purchase (at least publicly) the F-22 Raptor or the F-23 (that lost to the F-22, barely), as a Tomcat replacement (again, unless the new 2-seat F-18's are going to) which is an already built, with little or no R&D dollars needed, design that's ready to go.

Oh well, the JSF looks like it will be a bad boy. While I think the F-22 beat the F-23 because it looked similiar to the F-15 (prettier); I'm glad pretty won agains the Boeing contender for the JSF... Sheesh! I wouldn't want our pilots flying anything that, well, ugly...
Originally Posted by Bighersh
Damn, that's right- it was supposed to be revealed today.
This was announced yesterday, as Lockheed announced the layoff of 130 workers at the Fort Worth plant, due to reduced orders of the F-16.
Now that the F-35 is out (If we're dumb enough to sell it), they can expect F-16 orders to dwindle significantly.
This was announced yesterday, as Lockheed announced the layoff of 130 workers at the Fort Worth plant, due to reduced orders of the F-16.
Now that the F-35 is out (If we're dumb enough to sell it), they can expect F-16 orders to dwindle significantly.



