Iran has enriched uranium: Doesn't give a damn about UN Resoultions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #1  
Bighersh's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Iran has enriched uranium: Doesn't give a damn about UN Resoultions

AP:
By GEORGE JAHN, Associated Press Writer



Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gestures to the crowd during a public gathering in the city of Khorramdareh, about 120 miles (200 kilometers) west of the capital Tehran, Iran, Friday, April 28, 2006. Ahmadinejad vowed Thursday that no one could make Tehran give up its nuclear technology, and he warned that the United States and its European allies will regret their decision if they 'violate the rights of the Iranian nation.' (AP Photo/IRNA)

VIENNA, Austria - The International Atomic Energy Agency said Friday that Iran had enriched uranium and was in defiance of the U.N. Security Council. The finding that Iran was not in compliance, which was expected, was contained in a report drawn up by IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei.

It also reflected a standoff between Iran and agency inspectors pursuing questions about possible attempts by Tehran to make nuclear arms.

Britain followed with an announcement saying it will ask the Security Council to "increase the pressure on Iran."

"The Iranian nation won't give a damn about such useless resolutions," Ahmadinejad told thousands of people Friday in Khorramdareh in northwestern Iran.

"Today, they want to force us to give up our way through threats and sanctions but those who resort to language of coercion should know that nuclear energy is a national demand and by the grace of God, today Iran is a nuclear country," state-run television quoted him as saying.

In one of the few new developments in the IAEA's more than three-year investigation, the report concluded that Iran used undeclared plutonium in conducting small-scale separation experiments.

"The agency cannot exclude the possibility ... that the plutonium analyzed by the agency was derived from source(s) other than declared by Iran," the report said. Plutonium separation is one of the suspect "dual use" activities that could be used for a weapons program.
 

Last edited by Bighersh; Apr 28, 2006 at 11:31 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #2  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
I'm all for them having it, in fact I would like the U.S. to give it to them. Now, just where should we park our ICBM delivery truck??

Joe
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 03:01 PM
  #3  
Bighersh's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Originally Posted by Wookie
I'm all for them having it, in fact I would like the U.S. to give it to them. Now, just where should we park our ICBM delivery truck??

Joe
I think they wanted a 15 megaton "gadget" for them to examine.
Put a rip cord on the box, and when it's opened, there'd be a bright flash...

Man, I saw a special on the military channel about the world's nuclear powers. They showed film footage from a Russian Tu-95 of them exploding a 50 Megaton bomb over the northpole. I know that pissed Santa off. Chine blew up a big one, and as part of the training, their infantry ran (INTO) the area where the explosion had taken place, as part of their attack training. (WTF) With no protective suits or anything...

I'm sure all those guys are dead now, if they lasted a week after that exposure.

They showed extensive footage of our tests in the bikini islands and Johnston atol, not to mention New Mexico and gulp, southern Mississippi (who knew?). Man, some of the stuff we blew up was so big, it couldn't be dropped from a plane or carried on a missle (in the 1950's & 60's technology)...

Those were really scary times for anyone us to have nukes... If you see the movie 13 days, based on actual events, you'll see how periously close we all came to not being here...
 

Last edited by Bighersh; Apr 28, 2006 at 03:07 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #4  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
Iraq also violated UN resolutions...


and the US continues to squabble about pulling out.


Think Iran will be any different?



There are also basic rules of engagement. You can't just drop nukes onsomeone because theyare doing something you dont like. We condemned al Queda for doing exactly that.



So whats next? China bombs us because they think we should be buying more Chery cars?
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 11:17 AM
  #5  
98Lariet4x4's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by Bighersh
southern Mississippi (who knew?). Man, some of the stuff we blew up was so big, it couldn't be dropped from a plane or carried on a missle (in the 1950's & 60's technology)...

The southern Miss detonations were done in the salt cavarns, which scientists theorized (and were correct about, thank God) the salt would block the radiation. No radiation escaped. Those were actually the cleanest tests in our history.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 05:45 PM
  #6  
98Navi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
We have a multitude of excess tactical nuclear weapons layin around. Most people don't understand that tactical nukes are not the nuclear winter type weapons you see on tv. Tactical nukes are precise, and have little fallout. Sure, the area hit is F'd for quite some time, but its a way to nuke, win, and leave while solving the problem
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 06:33 PM
  #7  
J-150's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,316
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 98Navi
We have a multitude of excess tactical nuclear weapons layin around. Most people don't understand that tactical nukes are not the nuclear winter type weapons you see on tv. Tactical nukes are precise, and have little fallout. Sure, the area hit is F'd for quite some time, but its a way to nuke, win, and leave while solving the problem


which still takes us back to bombing a country that we are not at war with.


They are in violation of UN resolutions. It has nothing to do with the US directly.


If this is about terrorist harboring nations, then we should be prepared to attack ALL of them.


I'll tell you one thing, a war with Iran will drive oil to at least $100/barrel and gas to $5/gallon, minimum.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #8  
ViperGrendal's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: FL
Originally Posted by Bighersh
I think they wanted a 15 megaton "gadget" for them to examine.
Put a rip cord on the box, and when it's opened, there'd be a bright flash...

Man, I saw a special on the military channel about the world's nuclear powers. They showed film footage from a Russian Tu-95 of them exploding a 50 Megaton bomb over the northpole. I know that pissed Santa off. Chine blew up a big one, and as part of the training, their infantry ran (INTO) the area where the explosion had taken place, as part of their attack training. (WTF) With no protective suits or anything...

I'm sure all those guys are dead now, if they lasted a week after that exposure.

They showed extensive footage of our tests in the bikini islands and Johnston atol, not to mention New Mexico and gulp, southern Mississippi (who knew?). Man, some of the stuff we blew up was so big, it couldn't be dropped from a plane or carried on a missle (in the 1950's & 60's technology)...

Those were really scary times for anyone us to have nukes... If you see the movie 13 days, based on actual events, you'll see how periously close we all came to not being here...

Three movies, you can get from Netflix:
Trinity and Beyond
Rainbow bombs
Atomic Journeys: Welcome to Ground Zero
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 07:15 PM
  #9  
98Navi's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,618
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by J-150
which still takes us back to bombing a country that we are not at war with.


They are in violation of UN resolutions. It has nothing to do with the US directly.


If this is about terrorist harboring nations, then we should be prepared to attack ALL of them.


I'll tell you one thing, a war with Iran will drive oil to at least $100/barrel and gas to $5/gallon, minimum.
You must forget we foot like 40% of the UN's budget. Why the hell should we use our troops under their command when we're gonna end up footing the bill anyway? They are violating UN resolutions that we helped to create. They have had their fair share of warnings, and now they need some motivation to cease and desist or they just may cease to exist.
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #10  
01 XLT Sport's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,867
Likes: 0
From: NH
The good thing to note here is the fact that if we completely wiped out all the Middle East it would be no lose to the world economy. Well, unless sand sculptures are big money making products…


What has the Middle East ever produced beneficial to the world economy? Oil, but so what, they don’t produce it, they didn’t invent it, they didn’t create it, they simple drill some holes and pump it out.

Since oil resides deep underground nukes wouldn’t affect it. The oil wouldn’t be radioactive so if the whole place was leveled we could still drill for it. We could split up the Middle East three ways. One third for America, one third for Russia, and one third for Europe…

It’s a win-win-win situation…
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 12:41 AM
  #11  
topgun3208's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: maryland
sounds to me like bigsomething is running scared, what are u going to do bout it? nuffin!
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2006 | 09:43 PM
  #12  
Bighersh's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Originally Posted by ViperGrendal
Three movies, you can get from Netflix:
Trinity and Beyond
Rainbow bombs
Atomic Journeys: Welcome to Ground Zero
I've seen a lot of doumentaries on this subject; I've actually been to the Trinity test site; not by choice, but I've been.

I was there for three weeks in 1996; inhaling the still (lightly) radioactive dust...

I'm expecting my 3rd ******** to descend any day now...
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 12:05 AM
  #13  
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 3
From: Cabot, AR
Originally Posted by Bighersh
I'm expecting my 3rd ******** to descend any day now...
Most guys that I know would brag about that.

Joe
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 11:06 AM
  #14  
Bighersh's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
From: North of Dallas, South of Frisco
Originally Posted by Wookie
Most guys that I know would brag about that.

Joe

I'll be like Dr. Evil then... (Austin Powers: 1, 2 and 3)
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #15  
MnFatz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
And thanks to one, if not The most incompetent whitehouse in American history, we're making it easy for them.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/MS...uted_0501.html

Fire up the impeachment hearing rules. I'm not saying dubbya is guilty, I'm saying it's time to find out exactly how much damage he's actually done.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 AM.