Dearborn Truck Plant Parking
I WORK FOR FORD, I BUY A FORD.
That's a good Motto to live by and it makes sense (to you) and me, IF I worked for Ford. You probably didn't need an incentive to figure that out. Funny how the union jumped on the bandwagon with this parking issue, it clearly violates the rights of the worker, yet the Union supports it!
That's a good Motto to live by and it makes sense (to you) and me, IF I worked for Ford. You probably didn't need an incentive to figure that out. Funny how the union jumped on the bandwagon with this parking issue, it clearly violates the rights of the worker, yet the Union supports it!
My dad worked for Ford for 34 years and now on going on my 6th year. My dad never forced me to buy Ford but did explain never bite the hand that feeds you. you dont understand how sickening it is to see the people you work next to buying brand-x cars and the same people dont understand why Ford is laying off and closing plants.
just goes to show you how loyal people are nowadays.
just goes to show you how loyal people are nowadays.
Originally Posted by rmills
I WORK FOR FORD, I BUY A FORD.
That's a good Motto to live by and it makes sense (to you) and me, IF I worked for Ford. You probably didn't need an incentive to figure that out. Funny how the union jumped on the bandwagon with this parking issue, it clearly violates the rights of the worker, yet the Union supports it!
That's a good Motto to live by and it makes sense (to you) and me, IF I worked for Ford. You probably didn't need an incentive to figure that out. Funny how the union jumped on the bandwagon with this parking issue, it clearly violates the rights of the worker, yet the Union supports it!
This ought to be good..........
Why be loyal to an employer? They aren't loyal to the employee...
Most publicly owned, fortune 500 companies are loyal only to the bottom line, and the share-solders...
Soon, that statement will have 20 - 30,000 witnesses of how loyal their company was to them.
Most publicly owned, fortune 500 companies are loyal only to the bottom line, and the share-solders...
Soon, that statement will have 20 - 30,000 witnesses of how loyal their company was to them.
Originally Posted by Bighersh
Why be loyal to an employer? They aren't loyal to the employee...
Most publicly owned, fortune 500 companies are loyal only to the bottom line, and the share-solders...
Soon, that statement will have 20 - 30,000 witnesses of how loyal their company was to them.
Most publicly owned, fortune 500 companies are loyal only to the bottom line, and the share-solders...
Soon, that statement will have 20 - 30,000 witnesses of how loyal their company was to them.
who says employees are loyal to Ford? Their loyality is themsleves first, the Union second and lastly Ford.
As Ford being loyal to shareholders first... they are required to by law. It is their legal obligation to return to shareholders first.
Originally Posted by Fordomatic
Makes perfect sense to me, The UAW makes sure that Ford must pay the employee, the least Ford can do is let them know that buying other companies products doesn't sit well with them. It's seems kind of one way the Ford must keep the employee and the employee is free not to keep the company product. I know it's the employees free choice,however the company is also free to set policy! IMHO it's about time!
it's a free country. The Employees are free to seek employment elsewhere if they don't like it.
I have no problems with Ford doing this. They've done it before and removed that policy of separate parking in the last 10 years or less at many of their buildings.
However, Ford (and any other company) needs to understand why their employees are buying competitive brands. Why should people spend their hard earned money on something they feel is inferior? If a person is willing to forgo employee discounts and pay $xxxx more for a competitor, Ford needs to take note and develop something that person wants. I'm not saying all Ford (or anyone else's) products are junk, but few are truely competitive.
However, Ford (and any other company) needs to understand why their employees are buying competitive brands. Why should people spend their hard earned money on something they feel is inferior? If a person is willing to forgo employee discounts and pay $xxxx more for a competitor, Ford needs to take note and develop something that person wants. I'm not saying all Ford (or anyone else's) products are junk, but few are truely competitive.
Originally Posted by rmills
I miss-spoke.
What I meant was that it is ridiculous that ford needs to provide an incentive for something the worker should already want to do, buy what he has produced. If they need an incentive to desire their own workmanship, it must not live up to their own desires. To me this is pathetic, Ford is acknowledging it's own demise.
What I meant was that it is ridiculous that ford needs to provide an incentive for something the worker should already want to do, buy what he has produced. If they need an incentive to desire their own workmanship, it must not live up to their own desires. To me this is pathetic, Ford is acknowledging it's own demise.
I say Kudos.
Rob, I believe this happened at the Dearborn Truck Plant in the Rouge Complex, not Michigan Truck in Wayne....
Regardless, I say, it's about time!! Other Ford facilities, as wella s GM and Honda plants have been doing this for years. It's nothing new. I suspect (and this is all my opinion) that part of the motivation for that is image of the company. The DTP is the ONLY Ford plant that gives public tours, having re-introduced them in '04 for the first time in 20-some years. What kind of image does it present when the tour busses pull up in front of one of the world's most cutting edge assembly plants and the visiting public sees a parking lot littered with Hondas, Nissans, and Toyotas? What kind of image does that present to the public? As a business-owner, or manager, doesn't it just make sense that you'd want to project an image of brand-loyalty among your employees? I mean, honestly, if a Kerby salesman comes to your door and tells you that HE uses a Hoover, are you going to buy a Kerby vacuum?
For the record, nobody's employment at Ford is based on what BRAND of vehicle they drive. The plant is able to determine which vehicles are allowed to park close to the building in the assigned spaces and areas. The "off-site" parking across the street isn't that much farther from the plant. I parked in that lot myself as an apprentice for over a year and walked in for months at a time (because the shuttle busses weren't on the same schedule as me). It's not the end of the world....
-Joe
edit: I also forgot to mention: It's also about the old phrase, "You don't bite the hand that feeds you." When Ford puts the clothes on your back, food on your table, the table under your roof, and the roof over your head, the VERY least you can do is own ONE of their vehicles. That's not too much to ask. I own two myself, and will have a third after I get married. (My soon-to-be fiancee drives a Honda.... not going to happen after we get married, superior quality, fit, and finish or not!!)
Rob, I believe this happened at the Dearborn Truck Plant in the Rouge Complex, not Michigan Truck in Wayne....
Regardless, I say, it's about time!! Other Ford facilities, as wella s GM and Honda plants have been doing this for years. It's nothing new. I suspect (and this is all my opinion) that part of the motivation for that is image of the company. The DTP is the ONLY Ford plant that gives public tours, having re-introduced them in '04 for the first time in 20-some years. What kind of image does it present when the tour busses pull up in front of one of the world's most cutting edge assembly plants and the visiting public sees a parking lot littered with Hondas, Nissans, and Toyotas? What kind of image does that present to the public? As a business-owner, or manager, doesn't it just make sense that you'd want to project an image of brand-loyalty among your employees? I mean, honestly, if a Kerby salesman comes to your door and tells you that HE uses a Hoover, are you going to buy a Kerby vacuum?
For the record, nobody's employment at Ford is based on what BRAND of vehicle they drive. The plant is able to determine which vehicles are allowed to park close to the building in the assigned spaces and areas. The "off-site" parking across the street isn't that much farther from the plant. I parked in that lot myself as an apprentice for over a year and walked in for months at a time (because the shuttle busses weren't on the same schedule as me). It's not the end of the world....
-Joe
edit: I also forgot to mention: It's also about the old phrase, "You don't bite the hand that feeds you." When Ford puts the clothes on your back, food on your table, the table under your roof, and the roof over your head, the VERY least you can do is own ONE of their vehicles. That's not too much to ask. I own two myself, and will have a third after I get married. (My soon-to-be fiancee drives a Honda.... not going to happen after we get married, superior quality, fit, and finish or not!!)
Last edited by GIJoeCam; Jan 30, 2006 at 10:07 AM.
Originally Posted by Fordophile
This is an interesting story in light of Ford's recent announced plant closings and the resulting layoffs. Apparently, if you work there, they expect you to drive one of their products. You can still drive something else, just not park it in their lot. Wonder if it will do anything to help their bottom line.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/27/news...glot/index.htm
Fordophile
http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/27/news...glot/index.htm
Fordophile


